Cargando…
Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity
BACKGROUND: One of the main functions of diet is to nurture the gut microbiota and this relationship affects the health of the host. However, different analysis strategies can generate different views on the relative abundance of each microbial taxon, which can affect our conclusions about the signi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240672 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10372 |
_version_ | 1783612167867596800 |
---|---|
author | Garcia-Mazcorro, Jose F. Kawas, Jorge R. Licona Cassani, Cuauhtemoc Mertens-Talcott, Susanne Noratto, Giuliana |
author_facet | Garcia-Mazcorro, Jose F. Kawas, Jorge R. Licona Cassani, Cuauhtemoc Mertens-Talcott, Susanne Noratto, Giuliana |
author_sort | Garcia-Mazcorro, Jose F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the main functions of diet is to nurture the gut microbiota and this relationship affects the health of the host. However, different analysis strategies can generate different views on the relative abundance of each microbial taxon, which can affect our conclusions about the significance of diet to gut health in lean and obese subjects. Here we explored the impact of using different analysis strategies to study the gut microbiota in a context of diet, health and obesity. METHODS: Over 15 million 16S rRNA gene sequences from published studies involving dietary interventions in obese laboratory rodents were analyzed. Three strategies were used to assign the 16S sequences to Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) based on the GreenGenes reference OTU sequence files clustered at 97% and 99% similarity. RESULTS: Different strategies to select OTUs influenced the relative abundance of all bacterial taxa, but the magnitude of this phenomenon showed a strong study effect. Different taxa showed up to 20% difference in relative abundance within the same study, depending on the analysis strategy. Very few OTUs were shared among the samples. ANOSIM test on unweighted UniFrac distances showed that study, sequencing technique, animal model, and dietary treatment (in that order) were the most important factors explaining the differences in bacterial communities. Except for obesity status, the contribution of diet and other factors to explain the variability in bacterial communities was lower when using weighted UniFrac distances. Predicted functional profile and high-level phenotypes of the microbiota showed that each study was associated with unique features and patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm previous findings showing a strong study effect on gut microbial composition and raise concerns about the impact of analysis strategies on the membership and composition of the gut microbiota. This study may be helpful to guide future research aiming to investigate the relationship between diet, health, and the gut microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7678494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76784942020-11-24 Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity Garcia-Mazcorro, Jose F. Kawas, Jorge R. Licona Cassani, Cuauhtemoc Mertens-Talcott, Susanne Noratto, Giuliana PeerJ Bioinformatics BACKGROUND: One of the main functions of diet is to nurture the gut microbiota and this relationship affects the health of the host. However, different analysis strategies can generate different views on the relative abundance of each microbial taxon, which can affect our conclusions about the significance of diet to gut health in lean and obese subjects. Here we explored the impact of using different analysis strategies to study the gut microbiota in a context of diet, health and obesity. METHODS: Over 15 million 16S rRNA gene sequences from published studies involving dietary interventions in obese laboratory rodents were analyzed. Three strategies were used to assign the 16S sequences to Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) based on the GreenGenes reference OTU sequence files clustered at 97% and 99% similarity. RESULTS: Different strategies to select OTUs influenced the relative abundance of all bacterial taxa, but the magnitude of this phenomenon showed a strong study effect. Different taxa showed up to 20% difference in relative abundance within the same study, depending on the analysis strategy. Very few OTUs were shared among the samples. ANOSIM test on unweighted UniFrac distances showed that study, sequencing technique, animal model, and dietary treatment (in that order) were the most important factors explaining the differences in bacterial communities. Except for obesity status, the contribution of diet and other factors to explain the variability in bacterial communities was lower when using weighted UniFrac distances. Predicted functional profile and high-level phenotypes of the microbiota showed that each study was associated with unique features and patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm previous findings showing a strong study effect on gut microbial composition and raise concerns about the impact of analysis strategies on the membership and composition of the gut microbiota. This study may be helpful to guide future research aiming to investigate the relationship between diet, health, and the gut microbiota. PeerJ Inc. 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7678494/ /pubmed/33240672 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10372 Text en ©2020 Garcia-Mazcorro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Bioinformatics Garcia-Mazcorro, Jose F. Kawas, Jorge R. Licona Cassani, Cuauhtemoc Mertens-Talcott, Susanne Noratto, Giuliana Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title | Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title_full | Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title_fullStr | Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title_short | Different analysis strategies of 16S rRNA gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
title_sort | different analysis strategies of 16s rrna gene data from rodent studies generate contrasting views of gut bacterial communities associated with diet, health and obesity |
topic | Bioinformatics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240672 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciamazcorrojosef differentanalysisstrategiesof16srrnagenedatafromrodentstudiesgeneratecontrastingviewsofgutbacterialcommunitiesassociatedwithdiethealthandobesity AT kawasjorger differentanalysisstrategiesof16srrnagenedatafromrodentstudiesgeneratecontrastingviewsofgutbacterialcommunitiesassociatedwithdiethealthandobesity AT liconacassanicuauhtemoc differentanalysisstrategiesof16srrnagenedatafromrodentstudiesgeneratecontrastingviewsofgutbacterialcommunitiesassociatedwithdiethealthandobesity AT mertenstalcottsusanne differentanalysisstrategiesof16srrnagenedatafromrodentstudiesgeneratecontrastingviewsofgutbacterialcommunitiesassociatedwithdiethealthandobesity AT norattogiuliana differentanalysisstrategiesof16srrnagenedatafromrodentstudiesgeneratecontrastingviewsofgutbacterialcommunitiesassociatedwithdiethealthandobesity |