Cargando…

Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador

BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fors, Martha, González, Paloma, Viada, Carmen, Falcon, Kirsten, Palacios, Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3
_version_ 1783612202804051968
author Fors, Martha
González, Paloma
Viada, Carmen
Falcon, Kirsten
Palacios, Santiago
author_facet Fors, Martha
González, Paloma
Viada, Carmen
Falcon, Kirsten
Palacios, Santiago
author_sort Fors, Martha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSPC for Ecuadorians. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study recruited participants of both sexes between 40 and 90 years of age living in a rural area of Quito, Ecuador. Cronbach α values were used to assess the internal consistency of the scale. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients indicated that the reliability of the responses to the scale was fair. Total α value was .515, whereas the α values of the two factors were .42 and .67. Most item-to-factor correlations had a low to moderate magnitude, ranging from r = 0.30 to 0.37. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution and achieved good overall fit as indicated by root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and nonnormed fit index = 0.88 was mediocre. Goodness-of-fit χ(2) = 177.10, P < .001. The factor loads were greater than 0.30, ranging from 0.30 to 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The FSPC showed an acceptable construct validity and a fair internal consistency. The five-item scale could potentially be used as an effective instrument for assessing skin phototype in non-White people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76786572020-11-23 Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador Fors, Martha González, Paloma Viada, Carmen Falcon, Kirsten Palacios, Santiago Adv Skin Wound Care Online Exclusives BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSPC for Ecuadorians. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study recruited participants of both sexes between 40 and 90 years of age living in a rural area of Quito, Ecuador. Cronbach α values were used to assess the internal consistency of the scale. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients indicated that the reliability of the responses to the scale was fair. Total α value was .515, whereas the α values of the two factors were .42 and .67. Most item-to-factor correlations had a low to moderate magnitude, ranging from r = 0.30 to 0.37. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution and achieved good overall fit as indicated by root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and nonnormed fit index = 0.88 was mediocre. Goodness-of-fit χ(2) = 177.10, P < .001. The factor loads were greater than 0.30, ranging from 0.30 to 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The FSPC showed an acceptable construct validity and a fair internal consistency. The five-item scale could potentially be used as an effective instrument for assessing skin phototype in non-White people. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7678657/ /pubmed/33208633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Online Exclusives
Fors, Martha
González, Paloma
Viada, Carmen
Falcon, Kirsten
Palacios, Santiago
Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title_full Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title_fullStr Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title_short Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
title_sort validity of the fitzpatrick skin phototype classification in ecuador
topic Online Exclusives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3
work_keys_str_mv AT forsmartha validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador
AT gonzalezpaloma validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador
AT viadacarmen validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador
AT falconkirsten validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador
AT palaciossantiago validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador