Cargando…
Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador
BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3 |
_version_ | 1783612202804051968 |
---|---|
author | Fors, Martha González, Paloma Viada, Carmen Falcon, Kirsten Palacios, Santiago |
author_facet | Fors, Martha González, Paloma Viada, Carmen Falcon, Kirsten Palacios, Santiago |
author_sort | Fors, Martha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSPC for Ecuadorians. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study recruited participants of both sexes between 40 and 90 years of age living in a rural area of Quito, Ecuador. Cronbach α values were used to assess the internal consistency of the scale. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients indicated that the reliability of the responses to the scale was fair. Total α value was .515, whereas the α values of the two factors were .42 and .67. Most item-to-factor correlations had a low to moderate magnitude, ranging from r = 0.30 to 0.37. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution and achieved good overall fit as indicated by root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and nonnormed fit index = 0.88 was mediocre. Goodness-of-fit χ(2) = 177.10, P < .001. The factor loads were greater than 0.30, ranging from 0.30 to 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The FSPC showed an acceptable construct validity and a fair internal consistency. The five-item scale could potentially be used as an effective instrument for assessing skin phototype in non-White people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7678657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76786572020-11-23 Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador Fors, Martha González, Paloma Viada, Carmen Falcon, Kirsten Palacios, Santiago Adv Skin Wound Care Online Exclusives BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most common tool used to assess skin phototype in White populations according to the amount of pigment the skin has and its reaction to sun exposure. Scientific evidence about the use of this scale for persons with darker skin is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the FSPC for Ecuadorians. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study recruited participants of both sexes between 40 and 90 years of age living in a rural area of Quito, Ecuador. Cronbach α values were used to assess the internal consistency of the scale. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency coefficients indicated that the reliability of the responses to the scale was fair. Total α value was .515, whereas the α values of the two factors were .42 and .67. Most item-to-factor correlations had a low to moderate magnitude, ranging from r = 0.30 to 0.37. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor solution and achieved good overall fit as indicated by root mean square error of approximation = 0.08, and nonnormed fit index = 0.88 was mediocre. Goodness-of-fit χ(2) = 177.10, P < .001. The factor loads were greater than 0.30, ranging from 0.30 to 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The FSPC showed an acceptable construct validity and a fair internal consistency. The five-item scale could potentially be used as an effective instrument for assessing skin phototype in non-White people. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7678657/ /pubmed/33208633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Online Exclusives Fors, Martha González, Paloma Viada, Carmen Falcon, Kirsten Palacios, Santiago Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title | Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title_full | Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title_fullStr | Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title_short | Validity of the Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification in Ecuador |
title_sort | validity of the fitzpatrick skin phototype classification in ecuador |
topic | Online Exclusives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000721168.40561.a3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forsmartha validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador AT gonzalezpaloma validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador AT viadacarmen validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador AT falconkirsten validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador AT palaciossantiago validityofthefitzpatrickskinphototypeclassificationinecuador |