Cargando…

Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations

Background: The ability to resist adverse outcomes, or demonstrate resilience after exposure to trauma is a thriving field of study. Yet ongoing debate persists regarding definitions of resilience, generalizability of the extant literature, neurobiological correlates, and a consensus research agenda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denckla, Christy A., Cicchetti, Dante, Kubzansky, Laura D., Seedat, Soraya, Teicher, Martin H., Williams, David R., Koenen, Karestan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064
_version_ 1783612206495039488
author Denckla, Christy A.
Cicchetti, Dante
Kubzansky, Laura D.
Seedat, Soraya
Teicher, Martin H.
Williams, David R.
Koenen, Karestan C.
author_facet Denckla, Christy A.
Cicchetti, Dante
Kubzansky, Laura D.
Seedat, Soraya
Teicher, Martin H.
Williams, David R.
Koenen, Karestan C.
author_sort Denckla, Christy A.
collection PubMed
description Background: The ability to resist adverse outcomes, or demonstrate resilience after exposure to trauma is a thriving field of study. Yet ongoing debate persists regarding definitions of resilience, generalizability of the extant literature, neurobiological correlates, and a consensus research agenda. Objectives: To address these pressing questions, Drs. Christy Denckla and Karestan Koenen (co-chairs) convened a multidisciplinary panel including Drs. Dante Cicchetti, Laura Kubzansky, Soraya Seedat, Martin Teicher, and David Williams at the 2019 annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). Questions included (1) how have definitions of resilience evolved, (2) what are the best approaches to capture the complexity of resilience processes, and (3) what are the most important areas for future research? Methods: The proceedings of this panel are summarized in this report, and prominent themes are synthesized and integrated. Results: While different definitions emerged, all shared a focus on conceptualizing resilience at multiple levels, from the biological to the social structural level, a focus on the dynamic nature of resilience, and a move away from conceptualizing resilience as only an individual trait. Critical areas for future research included 1) focused efforts to improve assessment that has international and cross-cultural validity, 2) developing within-study designs that employ more intensive phenotyping strategies, 3) examining outcomes across multiple levels and domains, and 4) integrating conceptualizations of resilience from the individual-level to the larger social context at the population health level. Conclusion: Increasingly sophisticated and nuanced conceptual frameworks, coupled with research leveraging advances in genetics, molecular biology, increased computational capacity, and larger, more diverse datasets suggest that the next decade of research could bring significant breakthroughs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76786762020-11-25 Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations Denckla, Christy A. Cicchetti, Dante Kubzansky, Laura D. Seedat, Soraya Teicher, Martin H. Williams, David R. Koenen, Karestan C. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article Background: The ability to resist adverse outcomes, or demonstrate resilience after exposure to trauma is a thriving field of study. Yet ongoing debate persists regarding definitions of resilience, generalizability of the extant literature, neurobiological correlates, and a consensus research agenda. Objectives: To address these pressing questions, Drs. Christy Denckla and Karestan Koenen (co-chairs) convened a multidisciplinary panel including Drs. Dante Cicchetti, Laura Kubzansky, Soraya Seedat, Martin Teicher, and David Williams at the 2019 annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). Questions included (1) how have definitions of resilience evolved, (2) what are the best approaches to capture the complexity of resilience processes, and (3) what are the most important areas for future research? Methods: The proceedings of this panel are summarized in this report, and prominent themes are synthesized and integrated. Results: While different definitions emerged, all shared a focus on conceptualizing resilience at multiple levels, from the biological to the social structural level, a focus on the dynamic nature of resilience, and a move away from conceptualizing resilience as only an individual trait. Critical areas for future research included 1) focused efforts to improve assessment that has international and cross-cultural validity, 2) developing within-study designs that employ more intensive phenotyping strategies, 3) examining outcomes across multiple levels and domains, and 4) integrating conceptualizations of resilience from the individual-level to the larger social context at the population health level. Conclusion: Increasingly sophisticated and nuanced conceptual frameworks, coupled with research leveraging advances in genetics, molecular biology, increased computational capacity, and larger, more diverse datasets suggest that the next decade of research could bring significant breakthroughs. Taylor & Francis 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7678676/ /pubmed/33244362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research Article
Denckla, Christy A.
Cicchetti, Dante
Kubzansky, Laura D.
Seedat, Soraya
Teicher, Martin H.
Williams, David R.
Koenen, Karestan C.
Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title_full Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title_fullStr Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title_short Psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
title_sort psychological resilience: an update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations
topic Basic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064
work_keys_str_mv AT dencklachristya psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT cicchettidante psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT kubzanskylaurad psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT seedatsoraya psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT teichermartinh psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT williamsdavidr psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations
AT koenenkarestanc psychologicalresilienceanupdateondefinitionsacriticalappraisalandresearchrecommendations