Cargando…

Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry

This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that migh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jinhee, Mori, Yosai, Nejima, Ryohei, Minami, Keiichiro, Miyata, Kazunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33214642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77214-8
_version_ 1783612239037595648
author Lee, Jinhee
Mori, Yosai
Nejima, Ryohei
Minami, Keiichiro
Miyata, Kazunori
author_facet Lee, Jinhee
Mori, Yosai
Nejima, Ryohei
Minami, Keiichiro
Miyata, Kazunori
author_sort Lee, Jinhee
collection PubMed
description This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that might affect the visual field. ZMB00 (+ 4.00 D add), ZXR00V (+ 1.75 D add), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) were used as multifocal, EDOF, and monofocal IOLs, respectively. Humphrey Visual Field 10–2 testing was performed 2–3 months after cataract surgery, acceptable reliability indices were measured, and mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), foveal sensitivity and mean sensitivity (MS) were compared. Seventy-one eyes (ZXR00V: 24 eyes, ZMB00: 25 eyes, ZCB00V: 22 eyes) were used for the analyses. The MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were significantly higher than those of the multifocal group (P < 0.0051). However, the MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were not different (P > 0.23). The PSD and foveal sensitivity were not different among the groups. In non-glaucomatous patients, the MD and MS of the EDOF IOL were comparable to those of the monofocal IOL and better than those of the multifocal IOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76788572020-11-23 Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry Lee, Jinhee Mori, Yosai Nejima, Ryohei Minami, Keiichiro Miyata, Kazunori Sci Rep Article This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that might affect the visual field. ZMB00 (+ 4.00 D add), ZXR00V (+ 1.75 D add), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) were used as multifocal, EDOF, and monofocal IOLs, respectively. Humphrey Visual Field 10–2 testing was performed 2–3 months after cataract surgery, acceptable reliability indices were measured, and mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), foveal sensitivity and mean sensitivity (MS) were compared. Seventy-one eyes (ZXR00V: 24 eyes, ZMB00: 25 eyes, ZCB00V: 22 eyes) were used for the analyses. The MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were significantly higher than those of the multifocal group (P < 0.0051). However, the MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were not different (P > 0.23). The PSD and foveal sensitivity were not different among the groups. In non-glaucomatous patients, the MD and MS of the EDOF IOL were comparable to those of the monofocal IOL and better than those of the multifocal IOL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678857/ /pubmed/33214642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77214-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jinhee
Mori, Yosai
Nejima, Ryohei
Minami, Keiichiro
Miyata, Kazunori
Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title_full Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title_fullStr Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title_short Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
title_sort influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33214642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77214-8
work_keys_str_mv AT leejinhee influenceofimplantationsofextendeddepthoffocusonstandardautomatedperimetry
AT moriyosai influenceofimplantationsofextendeddepthoffocusonstandardautomatedperimetry
AT nejimaryohei influenceofimplantationsofextendeddepthoffocusonstandardautomatedperimetry
AT minamikeiichiro influenceofimplantationsofextendeddepthoffocusonstandardautomatedperimetry
AT miyatakazunori influenceofimplantationsofextendeddepthoffocusonstandardautomatedperimetry