Cargando…

The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types

High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evdokimova, Elizaveta V., Gladkov, Grigory V., Kuzina, Natalya I., Ivanova, Ekaterina A., Kimeklis, Anastasiia K., Zverev, Aleksei O., Kichko, Arina A., Aksenova, Tatyana S., Pinaev, Alexander G., Andronov, Evgeny E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060
_version_ 1783612260728438784
author Evdokimova, Elizaveta V.
Gladkov, Grigory V.
Kuzina, Natalya I.
Ivanova, Ekaterina A.
Kimeklis, Anastasiia K.
Zverev, Aleksei O.
Kichko, Arina A.
Aksenova, Tatyana S.
Pinaev, Alexander G.
Andronov, Evgeny E.
author_facet Evdokimova, Elizaveta V.
Gladkov, Grigory V.
Kuzina, Natalya I.
Ivanova, Ekaterina A.
Kimeklis, Anastasiia K.
Zverev, Aleksei O.
Kichko, Arina A.
Aksenova, Tatyana S.
Pinaev, Alexander G.
Andronov, Evgeny E.
author_sort Evdokimova, Elizaveta V.
collection PubMed
description High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific microorganisms have been identified: for sod-podzolic soil—Acidothermus, Devosia, Phenylobacterium and Tumebacillus, and for chernozem soil—Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Blastococcus. The dynamics of differences between soil types for bulk soil samples and culturomes varied depending on the taxonomic level of the corresponding phylotypes. At high taxonomic levels, the number of common taxa between soil types increased more slowly for bulk soil than for culturome. Differences between soil-specific phylotypes were detected in bulk soil at a low taxonomic level (genus, species). A total of 13 phylotypes were represented both in soil and in culturome. No relationship was shown between the abundance of these phylotypes in soil and culturome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76789882020-12-02 The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. Gladkov, Grigory V. Kuzina, Natalya I. Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. Zverev, Aleksei O. Kichko, Arina A. Aksenova, Tatyana S. Pinaev, Alexander G. Andronov, Evgeny E. PLoS One Research Article High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific microorganisms have been identified: for sod-podzolic soil—Acidothermus, Devosia, Phenylobacterium and Tumebacillus, and for chernozem soil—Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Blastococcus. The dynamics of differences between soil types for bulk soil samples and culturomes varied depending on the taxonomic level of the corresponding phylotypes. At high taxonomic levels, the number of common taxa between soil types increased more slowly for bulk soil than for culturome. Differences between soil-specific phylotypes were detected in bulk soil at a low taxonomic level (genus, species). A total of 13 phylotypes were represented both in soil and in culturome. No relationship was shown between the abundance of these phylotypes in soil and culturome. Public Library of Science 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7678988/ /pubmed/33216789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060 Text en © 2020 Evdokimova et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Evdokimova, Elizaveta V.
Gladkov, Grigory V.
Kuzina, Natalya I.
Ivanova, Ekaterina A.
Kimeklis, Anastasiia K.
Zverev, Aleksei O.
Kichko, Arina A.
Aksenova, Tatyana S.
Pinaev, Alexander G.
Andronov, Evgeny E.
The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title_full The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title_fullStr The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title_full_unstemmed The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title_short The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
title_sort difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060
work_keys_str_mv AT evdokimovaelizavetav thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT gladkovgrigoryv thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kuzinanatalyai thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT ivanovaekaterinaa thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kimeklisanastasiiak thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT zverevalekseio thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kichkoarinaa thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT aksenovatatyanas thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT pinaevalexanderg thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT andronovevgenye thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT evdokimovaelizavetav differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT gladkovgrigoryv differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kuzinanatalyai differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT ivanovaekaterinaa differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kimeklisanastasiiak differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT zverevalekseio differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT kichkoarinaa differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT aksenovatatyanas differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT pinaevalexanderg differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes
AT andronovevgenye differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes