Cargando…
The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types
High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060 |
_version_ | 1783612260728438784 |
---|---|
author | Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. Gladkov, Grigory V. Kuzina, Natalya I. Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. Zverev, Aleksei O. Kichko, Arina A. Aksenova, Tatyana S. Pinaev, Alexander G. Andronov, Evgeny E. |
author_facet | Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. Gladkov, Grigory V. Kuzina, Natalya I. Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. Zverev, Aleksei O. Kichko, Arina A. Aksenova, Tatyana S. Pinaev, Alexander G. Andronov, Evgeny E. |
author_sort | Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific microorganisms have been identified: for sod-podzolic soil—Acidothermus, Devosia, Phenylobacterium and Tumebacillus, and for chernozem soil—Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Blastococcus. The dynamics of differences between soil types for bulk soil samples and culturomes varied depending on the taxonomic level of the corresponding phylotypes. At high taxonomic levels, the number of common taxa between soil types increased more slowly for bulk soil than for culturome. Differences between soil-specific phylotypes were detected in bulk soil at a low taxonomic level (genus, species). A total of 13 phylotypes were represented both in soil and in culturome. No relationship was shown between the abundance of these phylotypes in soil and culturome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7678988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76789882020-12-02 The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. Gladkov, Grigory V. Kuzina, Natalya I. Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. Zverev, Aleksei O. Kichko, Arina A. Aksenova, Tatyana S. Pinaev, Alexander G. Andronov, Evgeny E. PLoS One Research Article High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to compare the microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types—sod-podzolic soil and chernozem—and the corresponding culturome communities of potentially cellulolytic bacteria cultured on standard Hutchinson media. For each soil type, soil-specific microorganisms have been identified: for sod-podzolic soil—Acidothermus, Devosia, Phenylobacterium and Tumebacillus, and for chernozem soil—Sphingomonas, Bacillus and Blastococcus. The dynamics of differences between soil types for bulk soil samples and culturomes varied depending on the taxonomic level of the corresponding phylotypes. At high taxonomic levels, the number of common taxa between soil types increased more slowly for bulk soil than for culturome. Differences between soil-specific phylotypes were detected in bulk soil at a low taxonomic level (genus, species). A total of 13 phylotypes were represented both in soil and in culturome. No relationship was shown between the abundance of these phylotypes in soil and culturome. Public Library of Science 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7678988/ /pubmed/33216789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060 Text en © 2020 Evdokimova et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Evdokimova, Elizaveta V. Gladkov, Grigory V. Kuzina, Natalya I. Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. Zverev, Aleksei O. Kichko, Arina A. Aksenova, Tatyana S. Pinaev, Alexander G. Andronov, Evgeny E. The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title | The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title_full | The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title_fullStr | The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title_full_unstemmed | The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title_short | The difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
title_sort | difference between cellulolytic ‘culturomes’ and microbiomes inhabiting two contrasting soil types |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33216789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evdokimovaelizavetav thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT gladkovgrigoryv thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kuzinanatalyai thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT ivanovaekaterinaa thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kimeklisanastasiiak thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT zverevalekseio thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kichkoarinaa thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT aksenovatatyanas thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT pinaevalexanderg thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT andronovevgenye thedifferencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT evdokimovaelizavetav differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT gladkovgrigoryv differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kuzinanatalyai differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT ivanovaekaterinaa differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kimeklisanastasiiak differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT zverevalekseio differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT kichkoarinaa differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT aksenovatatyanas differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT pinaevalexanderg differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes AT andronovevgenye differencebetweencellulolyticculturomesandmicrobiomesinhabitingtwocontrastingsoiltypes |