Cargando…

Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishio, Yoshitomo, Hoshino, Tetsuro, Murotani, Kenta, Furuhashi, Akifumi, Baku, Masayo, Sasanabe, Ryujiro, Kazaoka, Yoshiaki, Shiomi, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5
_version_ 1783612316598665216
author Nishio, Yoshitomo
Hoshino, Tetsuro
Murotani, Kenta
Furuhashi, Akifumi
Baku, Masayo
Sasanabe, Ryujiro
Kazaoka, Yoshiaki
Shiomi, Toshiaki
author_facet Nishio, Yoshitomo
Hoshino, Tetsuro
Murotani, Kenta
Furuhashi, Akifumi
Baku, Masayo
Sasanabe, Ryujiro
Kazaoka, Yoshiaki
Shiomi, Toshiaki
author_sort Nishio, Yoshitomo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific OSA were prescribed OA treatment after diagnosis by polysomnography (PSG) and a follow-up sleep test by PSG was conducted. Efficacy and treatment outcome predictors were evaluated according to the following criteria for treatment success: #1, reduction of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to less than 5 and > 50% compared with baseline; #2, AHI reduction to less than 10 and > 50% compared with baseline; and #3, > 50% AHI reduction compared with baseline. RESULTS: Success rates according to criteria #1, #2, and #3 were 45.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0% in REM-related OSA and 36.4%, 52.3%, and 63.6% in non-stage-specific OSA, respectively. No significant differences in success rate were found between the two groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with each criterion as the response variable, only BMI was extracted as a significant predictor. The BMI cutoff values defined based on the maximum Youden index according to the three criteria were 26.2 kg/m(2), 25.6 kg/m(2), and 26.2 kg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in success rate of OA treatment were found between REM-related OSA and non-stage-specific OSA. BMI has greater impact on treatment outcome of OA in patients with REM-related OSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7679325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76793252020-11-23 Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea Nishio, Yoshitomo Hoshino, Tetsuro Murotani, Kenta Furuhashi, Akifumi Baku, Masayo Sasanabe, Ryujiro Kazaoka, Yoshiaki Shiomi, Toshiaki Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific OSA were prescribed OA treatment after diagnosis by polysomnography (PSG) and a follow-up sleep test by PSG was conducted. Efficacy and treatment outcome predictors were evaluated according to the following criteria for treatment success: #1, reduction of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to less than 5 and > 50% compared with baseline; #2, AHI reduction to less than 10 and > 50% compared with baseline; and #3, > 50% AHI reduction compared with baseline. RESULTS: Success rates according to criteria #1, #2, and #3 were 45.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0% in REM-related OSA and 36.4%, 52.3%, and 63.6% in non-stage-specific OSA, respectively. No significant differences in success rate were found between the two groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with each criterion as the response variable, only BMI was extracted as a significant predictor. The BMI cutoff values defined based on the maximum Youden index according to the three criteria were 26.2 kg/m(2), 25.6 kg/m(2), and 26.2 kg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in success rate of OA treatment were found between REM-related OSA and non-stage-specific OSA. BMI has greater impact on treatment outcome of OA in patients with REM-related OSA. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7679325/ /pubmed/31768931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
Nishio, Yoshitomo
Hoshino, Tetsuro
Murotani, Kenta
Furuhashi, Akifumi
Baku, Masayo
Sasanabe, Ryujiro
Kazaoka, Yoshiaki
Shiomi, Toshiaki
Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title_full Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title_fullStr Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title_full_unstemmed Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title_short Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
title_sort treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with rem-related obstructive sleep apnea
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nishioyoshitomo treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT hoshinotetsuro treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT murotanikenta treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT furuhashiakifumi treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT bakumasayo treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT sasanaberyujiro treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT kazaokayoshiaki treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea
AT shiomitoshiaki treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea