Cargando…
Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea
PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5 |
_version_ | 1783612316598665216 |
---|---|
author | Nishio, Yoshitomo Hoshino, Tetsuro Murotani, Kenta Furuhashi, Akifumi Baku, Masayo Sasanabe, Ryujiro Kazaoka, Yoshiaki Shiomi, Toshiaki |
author_facet | Nishio, Yoshitomo Hoshino, Tetsuro Murotani, Kenta Furuhashi, Akifumi Baku, Masayo Sasanabe, Ryujiro Kazaoka, Yoshiaki Shiomi, Toshiaki |
author_sort | Nishio, Yoshitomo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific OSA were prescribed OA treatment after diagnosis by polysomnography (PSG) and a follow-up sleep test by PSG was conducted. Efficacy and treatment outcome predictors were evaluated according to the following criteria for treatment success: #1, reduction of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to less than 5 and > 50% compared with baseline; #2, AHI reduction to less than 10 and > 50% compared with baseline; and #3, > 50% AHI reduction compared with baseline. RESULTS: Success rates according to criteria #1, #2, and #3 were 45.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0% in REM-related OSA and 36.4%, 52.3%, and 63.6% in non-stage-specific OSA, respectively. No significant differences in success rate were found between the two groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with each criterion as the response variable, only BMI was extracted as a significant predictor. The BMI cutoff values defined based on the maximum Youden index according to the three criteria were 26.2 kg/m(2), 25.6 kg/m(2), and 26.2 kg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in success rate of OA treatment were found between REM-related OSA and non-stage-specific OSA. BMI has greater impact on treatment outcome of OA in patients with REM-related OSA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7679325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76793252020-11-23 Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea Nishio, Yoshitomo Hoshino, Tetsuro Murotani, Kenta Furuhashi, Akifumi Baku, Masayo Sasanabe, Ryujiro Kazaoka, Yoshiaki Shiomi, Toshiaki Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: Oral appliances (OA) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of OA treatment in patients with rapid eye movement (REM)–related OSA. METHODS: Forty-six patients with REM-related OSA and 107 with non-stage-specific OSA were prescribed OA treatment after diagnosis by polysomnography (PSG) and a follow-up sleep test by PSG was conducted. Efficacy and treatment outcome predictors were evaluated according to the following criteria for treatment success: #1, reduction of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to less than 5 and > 50% compared with baseline; #2, AHI reduction to less than 10 and > 50% compared with baseline; and #3, > 50% AHI reduction compared with baseline. RESULTS: Success rates according to criteria #1, #2, and #3 were 45.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0% in REM-related OSA and 36.4%, 52.3%, and 63.6% in non-stage-specific OSA, respectively. No significant differences in success rate were found between the two groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with each criterion as the response variable, only BMI was extracted as a significant predictor. The BMI cutoff values defined based on the maximum Youden index according to the three criteria were 26.2 kg/m(2), 25.6 kg/m(2), and 26.2 kg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in success rate of OA treatment were found between REM-related OSA and non-stage-specific OSA. BMI has greater impact on treatment outcome of OA in patients with REM-related OSA. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7679325/ /pubmed/31768931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article Nishio, Yoshitomo Hoshino, Tetsuro Murotani, Kenta Furuhashi, Akifumi Baku, Masayo Sasanabe, Ryujiro Kazaoka, Yoshiaki Shiomi, Toshiaki Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title | Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title_full | Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title_fullStr | Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title_short | Treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with REM-related obstructive sleep apnea |
title_sort | treatment outcome of oral appliance in patients with rem-related obstructive sleep apnea |
topic | Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31768931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01966-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishioyoshitomo treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT hoshinotetsuro treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT murotanikenta treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT furuhashiakifumi treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT bakumasayo treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT sasanaberyujiro treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT kazaokayoshiaki treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea AT shiomitoshiaki treatmentoutcomeoforalapplianceinpatientswithremrelatedobstructivesleepapnea |