Cargando…
Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data to support laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy is noteworthy given concerns about the use of polypropylene mesh in pelvic floor surgery. This study is aimed at determining the incidence of mesh-associated complications and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32620978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0 |
_version_ | 1783612325184405504 |
---|---|
author | Izett-Kay, Matthew L. Aldabeeb, Dana Kupelian, Anthony S. Cartwright, Rufus Cutner, Alfred S. Jackson, Simon Price, Natalia Vashisht, Arvind |
author_facet | Izett-Kay, Matthew L. Aldabeeb, Dana Kupelian, Anthony S. Cartwright, Rufus Cutner, Alfred S. Jackson, Simon Price, Natalia Vashisht, Arvind |
author_sort | Izett-Kay, Matthew L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data to support laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy is noteworthy given concerns about the use of polypropylene mesh in pelvic floor surgery. This study is aimed at determining the incidence of mesh-associated complications and reoperation following this procedure. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study of women who underwent laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy between 2010 and 2018. Potential participants were identified from surgical databases of five surgeons at two tertiary urogynaecology centres in the UK. The primary outcome was patient-reported mesh complication requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh. Secondary outcomes included other mesh-associated complications, reoperation rates and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) in prolapse symptoms. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used. RESULTS: Of 1,766 eligible participants, 1,121 women responded (response proportion 63.5%), at a median follow-up of 46 months. The incidence of mesh complications requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh was 0.4% (4 out of 1,121). The rate of chronic pain service use was 1.8%, and newly diagnosed systemic autoimmune disorders was 5.8%. The rate of reoperation for apical prolapse was 3.7%, and for any form of pelvic organ prolapse it was 13.6%. For PGI-I, 81.4% of patients were “much better” or “very much better”. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy has a low incidence of reoperation for mesh complications and apical prolapse, and a high rate of patient-reported improvement in prolapse symptoms. With appropriate clinical governance measures, the procedure offers an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension. However, long-term comparative studies are still required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7679361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76793612020-11-23 Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study Izett-Kay, Matthew L. Aldabeeb, Dana Kupelian, Anthony S. Cartwright, Rufus Cutner, Alfred S. Jackson, Simon Price, Natalia Vashisht, Arvind Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data to support laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy is noteworthy given concerns about the use of polypropylene mesh in pelvic floor surgery. This study is aimed at determining the incidence of mesh-associated complications and reoperation following this procedure. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study of women who underwent laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy between 2010 and 2018. Potential participants were identified from surgical databases of five surgeons at two tertiary urogynaecology centres in the UK. The primary outcome was patient-reported mesh complication requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh. Secondary outcomes included other mesh-associated complications, reoperation rates and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) in prolapse symptoms. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used. RESULTS: Of 1,766 eligible participants, 1,121 women responded (response proportion 63.5%), at a median follow-up of 46 months. The incidence of mesh complications requiring removal of hysteropexy mesh was 0.4% (4 out of 1,121). The rate of chronic pain service use was 1.8%, and newly diagnosed systemic autoimmune disorders was 5.8%. The rate of reoperation for apical prolapse was 3.7%, and for any form of pelvic organ prolapse it was 13.6%. For PGI-I, 81.4% of patients were “much better” or “very much better”. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy has a low incidence of reoperation for mesh complications and apical prolapse, and a high rate of patient-reported improvement in prolapse symptoms. With appropriate clinical governance measures, the procedure offers an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension. However, long-term comparative studies are still required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users Springer International Publishing 2020-07-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7679361/ /pubmed/32620978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Izett-Kay, Matthew L. Aldabeeb, Dana Kupelian, Anthony S. Cartwright, Rufus Cutner, Alfred S. Jackson, Simon Price, Natalia Vashisht, Arvind Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title | Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | long-term mesh complications and reoperation after laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32620978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04396-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT izettkaymatthewl longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT aldabeebdana longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT kupeliananthonys longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT cartwrightrufus longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT cutneralfreds longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT jacksonsimon longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT pricenatalia longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy AT vashishtarvind longtermmeshcomplicationsandreoperationafterlaparoscopicmeshsacrohysteropexyacrosssectionalstudy |