Cargando…

Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort

INTRODUCTION: Despite careful patient selection for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS), some Parkinson’s disease patients show limited improvement of motor disability. Innovative predictive analysing methods hold potential to develop a tool for clinicians that reliably predicts ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habets, Jeroen G.V., Janssen, Marcus L.F., Duits, Annelien A., Sijben, Laura C.J., Mulders, Anne E.P., De Greef, Bianca, Temel, Yasin, Kuijf, Mark L., Kubben, Pieter L., Herff, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240642
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10317
_version_ 1783612385165049856
author Habets, Jeroen G.V.
Janssen, Marcus L.F.
Duits, Annelien A.
Sijben, Laura C.J.
Mulders, Anne E.P.
De Greef, Bianca
Temel, Yasin
Kuijf, Mark L.
Kubben, Pieter L.
Herff, Christian
author_facet Habets, Jeroen G.V.
Janssen, Marcus L.F.
Duits, Annelien A.
Sijben, Laura C.J.
Mulders, Anne E.P.
De Greef, Bianca
Temel, Yasin
Kuijf, Mark L.
Kubben, Pieter L.
Herff, Christian
author_sort Habets, Jeroen G.V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite careful patient selection for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS), some Parkinson’s disease patients show limited improvement of motor disability. Innovative predictive analysing methods hold potential to develop a tool for clinicians that reliably predicts individual postoperative motor response, by only regarding clinical preoperative variables. The main aim of preoperative prediction would be to improve preoperative patient counselling, expectation management, and postoperative patient satisfaction. METHODS: We developed a machine learning logistic regression prediction model which generates probabilities for experiencing weak motor response one year after surgery. The model analyses preoperative variables and is trained on 89 patients using a five-fold cross-validation. Imaging and neurophysiology data are left out intentionally to ensure usability in the preoperative clinical practice. Weak responders (n = 30) were defined as patients who fail to show clinically relevant improvement on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale II, III or IV. RESULTS: The model predicts weak responders with an average area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.79 (standard deviation: 0.08), a true positive rate of 0.80 and a false positive rate of 0.24, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78%. The reported influences of individual preoperative variables are useful for clinical interpretation of the model, but cannot been interpreted separately regardless of the other variables in the model. CONCLUSION: The model’s diagnostic accuracy confirms the utility of machine learning based motor response prediction based on clinical preoperative variables. After reproduction and validation in a larger and prospective cohort, this prediction model holds potential to support clinicians during preoperative patient counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76800512020-11-24 Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort Habets, Jeroen G.V. Janssen, Marcus L.F. Duits, Annelien A. Sijben, Laura C.J. Mulders, Anne E.P. De Greef, Bianca Temel, Yasin Kuijf, Mark L. Kubben, Pieter L. Herff, Christian PeerJ Neurology INTRODUCTION: Despite careful patient selection for subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS), some Parkinson’s disease patients show limited improvement of motor disability. Innovative predictive analysing methods hold potential to develop a tool for clinicians that reliably predicts individual postoperative motor response, by only regarding clinical preoperative variables. The main aim of preoperative prediction would be to improve preoperative patient counselling, expectation management, and postoperative patient satisfaction. METHODS: We developed a machine learning logistic regression prediction model which generates probabilities for experiencing weak motor response one year after surgery. The model analyses preoperative variables and is trained on 89 patients using a five-fold cross-validation. Imaging and neurophysiology data are left out intentionally to ensure usability in the preoperative clinical practice. Weak responders (n = 30) were defined as patients who fail to show clinically relevant improvement on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale II, III or IV. RESULTS: The model predicts weak responders with an average area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.79 (standard deviation: 0.08), a true positive rate of 0.80 and a false positive rate of 0.24, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78%. The reported influences of individual preoperative variables are useful for clinical interpretation of the model, but cannot been interpreted separately regardless of the other variables in the model. CONCLUSION: The model’s diagnostic accuracy confirms the utility of machine learning based motor response prediction based on clinical preoperative variables. After reproduction and validation in a larger and prospective cohort, this prediction model holds potential to support clinicians during preoperative patient counseling. PeerJ Inc. 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7680051/ /pubmed/33240642 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10317 Text en ©2020 Habets et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Habets, Jeroen G.V.
Janssen, Marcus L.F.
Duits, Annelien A.
Sijben, Laura C.J.
Mulders, Anne E.P.
De Greef, Bianca
Temel, Yasin
Kuijf, Mark L.
Kubben, Pieter L.
Herff, Christian
Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title_full Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title_fullStr Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title_short Machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
title_sort machine learning prediction of motor response after deep brain stimulation in parkinson’s disease—proof of principle in a retrospective cohort
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240642
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10317
work_keys_str_mv AT habetsjeroengv machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT janssenmarcuslf machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT duitsanneliena machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT sijbenlauracj machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT muldersanneep machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT degreefbianca machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT temelyasin machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT kuijfmarkl machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT kubbenpieterl machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort
AT herffchristian machinelearningpredictionofmotorresponseafterdeepbrainstimulationinparkinsonsdiseaseproofofprincipleinaretrospectivecohort