Cargando…
Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5 |
_version_ | 1783612395435851776 |
---|---|
author | Murayama, Mitsuyoshi Nosaka, Kazunori Inami, Takayuki Shima, Norihiro Yoneda, Tsugutake |
author_facet | Murayama, Mitsuyoshi Nosaka, Kazunori Inami, Takayuki Shima, Norihiro Yoneda, Tsugutake |
author_sort | Murayama, Mitsuyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC) at 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. Muscle hardness (E) was calculated from the force–displacement relationship in PM, and strain ratio (SR) between an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus: 22.6 kPa) and different regions of interest (ROIs) in BB was calculated and converted to Young’s modulus (YM) in USE. In resting muscle, E was 26.1 ± 6.4 kPa, and SR and YM for the whole BB was 0.88 ± 0.4 and 30.8 ± 12.8 kPa, respectively. A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was evident between E and logarithmical transformed SR (LTSR) for the ROI of whole BB (r = − 0.626), and E and converted YM (r = 0.615). E increased approximately ninefold from resting to 90% MVC, and E and LTSR (r = − 0.732 to − 0.880), and E and converted YM for the SR above 0.1 were correlated (r = 0.599–0.768, p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle hardness values obtained by PM and USE are comparable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7680096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76800962020-11-24 Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography Murayama, Mitsuyoshi Nosaka, Kazunori Inami, Takayuki Shima, Norihiro Yoneda, Tsugutake Sci Rep Article This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC) at 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. Muscle hardness (E) was calculated from the force–displacement relationship in PM, and strain ratio (SR) between an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus: 22.6 kPa) and different regions of interest (ROIs) in BB was calculated and converted to Young’s modulus (YM) in USE. In resting muscle, E was 26.1 ± 6.4 kPa, and SR and YM for the whole BB was 0.88 ± 0.4 and 30.8 ± 12.8 kPa, respectively. A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was evident between E and logarithmical transformed SR (LTSR) for the ROI of whole BB (r = − 0.626), and E and converted YM (r = 0.615). E increased approximately ninefold from resting to 90% MVC, and E and LTSR (r = − 0.732 to − 0.880), and E and converted YM for the SR above 0.1 were correlated (r = 0.599–0.768, p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle hardness values obtained by PM and USE are comparable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7680096/ /pubmed/33219272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Murayama, Mitsuyoshi Nosaka, Kazunori Inami, Takayuki Shima, Norihiro Yoneda, Tsugutake Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title | Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title_full | Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title_fullStr | Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title_full_unstemmed | Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title_short | Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
title_sort | biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murayamamitsuyoshi bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography AT nosakakazunori bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography AT inamitakayuki bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography AT shimanorihiro bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography AT yonedatsugutake bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography |