Cargando…

Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography

This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murayama, Mitsuyoshi, Nosaka, Kazunori, Inami, Takayuki, Shima, Norihiro, Yoneda, Tsugutake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5
_version_ 1783612395435851776
author Murayama, Mitsuyoshi
Nosaka, Kazunori
Inami, Takayuki
Shima, Norihiro
Yoneda, Tsugutake
author_facet Murayama, Mitsuyoshi
Nosaka, Kazunori
Inami, Takayuki
Shima, Norihiro
Yoneda, Tsugutake
author_sort Murayama, Mitsuyoshi
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC) at 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. Muscle hardness (E) was calculated from the force–displacement relationship in PM, and strain ratio (SR) between an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus: 22.6 kPa) and different regions of interest (ROIs) in BB was calculated and converted to Young’s modulus (YM) in USE. In resting muscle, E was 26.1 ± 6.4 kPa, and SR and YM for the whole BB was 0.88 ± 0.4 and 30.8 ± 12.8 kPa, respectively. A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was evident between E and logarithmical transformed SR (LTSR) for the ROI of whole BB (r = − 0.626), and E and converted YM (r = 0.615). E increased approximately ninefold from resting to 90% MVC, and E and LTSR (r = − 0.732 to − 0.880), and E and converted YM for the SR above 0.1 were correlated (r = 0.599–0.768, p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle hardness values obtained by PM and USE are comparable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76800962020-11-24 Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography Murayama, Mitsuyoshi Nosaka, Kazunori Inami, Takayuki Shima, Norihiro Yoneda, Tsugutake Sci Rep Article This study investigated the relationship between push-in meter (PM) and ultrasound strain elastography (USE) for biceps brachii (BB) muscle hardness. BB hardness of 21 young men was assessed by PM and USE during rest and isometric contractions of six different intensities (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC) at 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. Muscle hardness (E) was calculated from the force–displacement relationship in PM, and strain ratio (SR) between an acoustic coupler (elastic modulus: 22.6 kPa) and different regions of interest (ROIs) in BB was calculated and converted to Young’s modulus (YM) in USE. In resting muscle, E was 26.1 ± 6.4 kPa, and SR and YM for the whole BB was 0.88 ± 0.4 and 30.8 ± 12.8 kPa, respectively. A significant (p < 0.01) correlation was evident between E and logarithmical transformed SR (LTSR) for the ROI of whole BB (r = − 0.626), and E and converted YM (r = 0.615). E increased approximately ninefold from resting to 90% MVC, and E and LTSR (r = − 0.732 to − 0.880), and E and converted YM for the SR above 0.1 were correlated (r = 0.599–0.768, p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle hardness values obtained by PM and USE are comparable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7680096/ /pubmed/33219272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Murayama, Mitsuyoshi
Nosaka, Kazunori
Inami, Takayuki
Shima, Norihiro
Yoneda, Tsugutake
Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title_full Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title_fullStr Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title_full_unstemmed Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title_short Biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
title_sort biceps brachii muscle hardness assessed by a push-in meter in comparison to ultrasound strain elastography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77330-5
work_keys_str_mv AT murayamamitsuyoshi bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography
AT nosakakazunori bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography
AT inamitakayuki bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography
AT shimanorihiro bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography
AT yonedatsugutake bicepsbrachiimusclehardnessassessedbyapushinmeterincomparisontoultrasoundstrainelastography