Cargando…

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis

INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis is a significant cause of nosocomial infections and is difficult to treat because of intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In addition, the emergence of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis (LZR-Efa) is reducing the choices available for anti-infective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Wei, Zhang, Jiajie, Tong, Jiepeng, Zhang, Li, Zhan, Yaqiong, Huang, Yicheng, Qiu, Yunqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32964392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00342-1
_version_ 1783612441895108608
author Yu, Wei
Zhang, Jiajie
Tong, Jiepeng
Zhang, Li
Zhan, Yaqiong
Huang, Yicheng
Qiu, Yunqing
author_facet Yu, Wei
Zhang, Jiajie
Tong, Jiepeng
Zhang, Li
Zhan, Yaqiong
Huang, Yicheng
Qiu, Yunqing
author_sort Yu, Wei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis is a significant cause of nosocomial infections and is difficult to treat because of intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In addition, the emergence of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis (LZR-Efa) is reducing the choices available for anti-infective therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the in vitro antibacterial effects of fosfomycin (FM), vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP), alone and in combination, against LZR-Efa. METHODS: Five LZR-Efa strains and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 were studied. The antibacterial effects of FM, and of FM, VAN and DAP, were assessed using the time–kill assay. Biofilm formation and elimination were evaluated by crystal violet staining. RESULTS: When used at concentrations greater than 0.5 × MIC, FM did not produce dose-dependent effects against LZR-Efa isolates. The use of DAP (47.1 mg/L) alone, and FM (83 mg/L) combined with DAP (20.6 mg/L), produced a persistent inhibitory effect against both planktonic LZR-Efa isolates and those forming biofilms. In addition, FM and VAN combined with glucose-6-phosphate produced visible eradication effects against biofilms grown for 24 h, while DAP alone or combined with FM resulted in the best eradication activity against biofilms grown for 72 h prior to exposure. CONCLUSION: The use of FM combined with DAP provided the best potential therapeutic option for treating LZR-Efa infections out of those tested. In addition, the optimum treatment for biofilm elimination depended on the stage of biofilm formation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00342-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76804682020-11-23 In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Yu, Wei Zhang, Jiajie Tong, Jiepeng Zhang, Li Zhan, Yaqiong Huang, Yicheng Qiu, Yunqing Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis is a significant cause of nosocomial infections and is difficult to treat because of intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In addition, the emergence of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis (LZR-Efa) is reducing the choices available for anti-infective therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the in vitro antibacterial effects of fosfomycin (FM), vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP), alone and in combination, against LZR-Efa. METHODS: Five LZR-Efa strains and E. faecalis ATCC 29212 were studied. The antibacterial effects of FM, and of FM, VAN and DAP, were assessed using the time–kill assay. Biofilm formation and elimination were evaluated by crystal violet staining. RESULTS: When used at concentrations greater than 0.5 × MIC, FM did not produce dose-dependent effects against LZR-Efa isolates. The use of DAP (47.1 mg/L) alone, and FM (83 mg/L) combined with DAP (20.6 mg/L), produced a persistent inhibitory effect against both planktonic LZR-Efa isolates and those forming biofilms. In addition, FM and VAN combined with glucose-6-phosphate produced visible eradication effects against biofilms grown for 24 h, while DAP alone or combined with FM resulted in the best eradication activity against biofilms grown for 72 h prior to exposure. CONCLUSION: The use of FM combined with DAP provided the best potential therapeutic option for treating LZR-Efa infections out of those tested. In addition, the optimum treatment for biofilm elimination depended on the stage of biofilm formation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00342-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-09-22 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7680468/ /pubmed/32964392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00342-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yu, Wei
Zhang, Jiajie
Tong, Jiepeng
Zhang, Li
Zhan, Yaqiong
Huang, Yicheng
Qiu, Yunqing
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title_full In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title_short In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Fosfomycin, Vancomycin and Daptomycin Alone, and in Combination, Against Linezolid-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort in vitro antimicrobial activity of fosfomycin, vancomycin and daptomycin alone, and in combination, against linezolid-resistant enterococcus faecalis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32964392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00342-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yuwei invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT zhangjiajie invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT tongjiepeng invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT zhangli invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT zhanyaqiong invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT huangyicheng invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis
AT qiuyunqing invitroantimicrobialactivityoffosfomycinvancomycinanddaptomycinaloneandincombinationagainstlinezolidresistantenterococcusfaecalis