Cargando…

Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the cortical-level sensory differences between natural teeth with a periodontal membrane and dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure brain activity in the cerebral cortex of 12 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekido, Daiki, Otsuka, Takero, Shimazaki, Tateshi, Ohno, Akinori, Fuchigami, Kei, Nagata, Koudai, Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro, Kimoto, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262866
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57463
_version_ 1783612459983044608
author Sekido, Daiki
Otsuka, Takero
Shimazaki, Tateshi
Ohno, Akinori
Fuchigami, Kei
Nagata, Koudai
Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro
Kimoto, Katsuhiko
author_facet Sekido, Daiki
Otsuka, Takero
Shimazaki, Tateshi
Ohno, Akinori
Fuchigami, Kei
Nagata, Koudai
Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro
Kimoto, Katsuhiko
author_sort Sekido, Daiki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the cortical-level sensory differences between natural teeth with a periodontal membrane and dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure brain activity in the cerebral cortex of 12 patients who had both natural teeth and dental implants in the lower molar region. Painless vibratory tactile stimulation was performed on both the natural teeth and the dental implants. RESULTS: Activation was seen in the somatosensory cortex during stimulation of both natural teeth and dental implants. A comparison of cortical activation showed no significant differences between natural teeth and dental implants. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the possible existence of sensory input to the cerebral cortex via dental implants as well as natural teeth, and thus suggest that may not only the periodontal membrane be involved in the signaling pathway. The data from this experiment may help us for understanding the neural mechanisms underlying natural teeth and dental implants. Key words:fNIRS, natural teeth, implants, brain activity, somatosensory cortex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76805662020-11-30 Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants Sekido, Daiki Otsuka, Takero Shimazaki, Tateshi Ohno, Akinori Fuchigami, Kei Nagata, Koudai Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro Kimoto, Katsuhiko J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the cortical-level sensory differences between natural teeth with a periodontal membrane and dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure brain activity in the cerebral cortex of 12 patients who had both natural teeth and dental implants in the lower molar region. Painless vibratory tactile stimulation was performed on both the natural teeth and the dental implants. RESULTS: Activation was seen in the somatosensory cortex during stimulation of both natural teeth and dental implants. A comparison of cortical activation showed no significant differences between natural teeth and dental implants. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the possible existence of sensory input to the cerebral cortex via dental implants as well as natural teeth, and thus suggest that may not only the periodontal membrane be involved in the signaling pathway. The data from this experiment may help us for understanding the neural mechanisms underlying natural teeth and dental implants. Key words:fNIRS, natural teeth, implants, brain activity, somatosensory cortex. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7680566/ /pubmed/33262866 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57463 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sekido, Daiki
Otsuka, Takero
Shimazaki, Tateshi
Ohno, Akinori
Fuchigami, Kei
Nagata, Koudai
Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro
Kimoto, Katsuhiko
Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title_full Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title_fullStr Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title_short Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
title_sort comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262866
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57463
work_keys_str_mv AT sekidodaiki comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT otsukatakero comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT shimazakitateshi comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT ohnoakinori comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT fuchigamikei comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT nagatakoudai comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT yamaguchitetsutaro comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants
AT kimotokatsuhiko comparisonofcerebralcortexactivationinducedbytactilestimulationbetweennaturalteethandimplants