Cargando…

Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the anatomy of the region during preoperative planning is very important in order to minimize the risks of undesired movements in the supporting teeth or even damage to important structures such as the maxillary sinus. To the best of our knowledge, no study evaluated the rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavares, Alana, Crusoé-Rebello, Iêda-Margarida, Neves, Frederico-Sampaio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57267
_version_ 1783612462101168128
author Tavares, Alana
Crusoé-Rebello, Iêda-Margarida
Neves, Frederico-Sampaio
author_facet Tavares, Alana
Crusoé-Rebello, Iêda-Margarida
Neves, Frederico-Sampaio
author_sort Tavares, Alana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Analysis of the anatomy of the region during preoperative planning is very important in order to minimize the risks of undesired movements in the supporting teeth or even damage to important structures such as the maxillary sinus. To the best of our knowledge, no study evaluated the relationship of these skeletal patterns with the anatomy of the infrazygomatic crest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tomographic measurements of the infrazygomatic crest for placement of temporary anchorage devices in individuals with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The measurements were analyzed in three regions in the crest of 67 patients above the maxillary first molar: A slice in the long axis of the mesiobuccal root, a slice passing through the center of the furcation area of the tooth, and another slice in the long axis of the distobuccal root. In each of these slices five measurements of the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest were performed, with a difference of 1 mm between them. The sagittal skeletal pattern was determined by the ANB angle and the vertical skeletal pattern by the SN.GoGn angle. RESULTS: The bone thickness of the crest tended to decrease gradually in the apical direction. There was no difference between different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The individual parameters did not have significant influence in the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest. Key words:Tomography, X-Ray Computed, orthodontics, mini-implant, infrazygomatic crest, maxilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76805752020-11-30 Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns Tavares, Alana Crusoé-Rebello, Iêda-Margarida Neves, Frederico-Sampaio J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Analysis of the anatomy of the region during preoperative planning is very important in order to minimize the risks of undesired movements in the supporting teeth or even damage to important structures such as the maxillary sinus. To the best of our knowledge, no study evaluated the relationship of these skeletal patterns with the anatomy of the infrazygomatic crest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tomographic measurements of the infrazygomatic crest for placement of temporary anchorage devices in individuals with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The measurements were analyzed in three regions in the crest of 67 patients above the maxillary first molar: A slice in the long axis of the mesiobuccal root, a slice passing through the center of the furcation area of the tooth, and another slice in the long axis of the distobuccal root. In each of these slices five measurements of the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest were performed, with a difference of 1 mm between them. The sagittal skeletal pattern was determined by the ANB angle and the vertical skeletal pattern by the SN.GoGn angle. RESULTS: The bone thickness of the crest tended to decrease gradually in the apical direction. There was no difference between different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The individual parameters did not have significant influence in the thickness of the infrazygomatic crest. Key words:Tomography, X-Ray Computed, orthodontics, mini-implant, infrazygomatic crest, maxilla. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7680575/ /pubmed/33262865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57267 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tavares, Alana
Crusoé-Rebello, Iêda-Margarida
Neves, Frederico-Sampaio
Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title_full Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title_fullStr Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title_full_unstemmed Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title_short Tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
title_sort tomographic evaluation of infrazygomatic crest for orthodontic anchorage in different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.57267
work_keys_str_mv AT tavaresalana tomographicevaluationofinfrazygomaticcrestfororthodonticanchorageindifferentverticalandsagittalskeletalpatterns
AT crusoerebelloiedamargarida tomographicevaluationofinfrazygomaticcrestfororthodonticanchorageindifferentverticalandsagittalskeletalpatterns
AT nevesfredericosampaio tomographicevaluationofinfrazygomaticcrestfororthodonticanchorageindifferentverticalandsagittalskeletalpatterns