Cargando…
Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey
BACKGROUND: As the global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, it is important to understand how frontline clinicians manage ventilatory support and the various limiting factors. METHODS: An online survey composed of 32 questions was developed and validated by an international expert...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S279031 |
_version_ | 1783612483138748416 |
---|---|
author | Alqahtani, Jaber S Mendes, Renata G Aldhahir, Abdulelah Rowley, Daniel AlAhmari, Mohammed D Ntoumenopoulos, George Alghamdi, Saeed M Sreedharan, Jithin K Aldabayan, Yousef S Oyelade, Tope Alrajeh, Ahmed Olivieri, Carlo AlQuaimi, Maher Sullivan, Jerome Almeshari, Mohammed A Esquinas, Antonio |
author_facet | Alqahtani, Jaber S Mendes, Renata G Aldhahir, Abdulelah Rowley, Daniel AlAhmari, Mohammed D Ntoumenopoulos, George Alghamdi, Saeed M Sreedharan, Jithin K Aldabayan, Yousef S Oyelade, Tope Alrajeh, Ahmed Olivieri, Carlo AlQuaimi, Maher Sullivan, Jerome Almeshari, Mohammed A Esquinas, Antonio |
author_sort | Alqahtani, Jaber S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, it is important to understand how frontline clinicians manage ventilatory support and the various limiting factors. METHODS: An online survey composed of 32 questions was developed and validated by an international expert panel. RESULTS: Overall, 502 respondents from 40 countries across six continents completed the survey. The mean number (±SD) of ICU beds was 64 ± 84. The most popular initial diagnostic tools used for treatment initiation were arterial blood gas (48%) and clinical presentation (37.5%), while the national COVID-19 guidelines were the most used (61.2%). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (53.8%), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (47%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (92%) were mostly used for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively. However, only 38.8%, 56.6% and 82.9% of the respondents had standard protocols for HFNC, NIV, and IMV, respectively. The most frequently used modes of IMV and NIV were volume control (VC) (36.1%) and continuous positive airway pressure/pressure support (CPAP/PS) (40.6%). About 54% of the respondents did not adhere to the recommended, regular ventilator check interval. The majority of the respondents (85.7%) used proning with IMV, with 48.4% using it for 12–16 hours, and 46.2% had tried awake proning in combination with HFNC or NIV. Increased staff workload (45.02%), lack of trained staff (44.22%) and shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) (42.63%) were the main barriers to COVID-19 management. CONCLUSION: Our results show that general clinical practices involving ventilatory support were highly heterogeneous, with limited use of standard protocols and most frontline clinicians depending on isolated and varied management guidelines. We found increased staff workload, lack of trained staff and shortage of PPE to be the main limiting factors affecting global COVID-19 ventilatory support management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7680685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76806852020-11-24 Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey Alqahtani, Jaber S Mendes, Renata G Aldhahir, Abdulelah Rowley, Daniel AlAhmari, Mohammed D Ntoumenopoulos, George Alghamdi, Saeed M Sreedharan, Jithin K Aldabayan, Yousef S Oyelade, Tope Alrajeh, Ahmed Olivieri, Carlo AlQuaimi, Maher Sullivan, Jerome Almeshari, Mohammed A Esquinas, Antonio J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research BACKGROUND: As the global outbreak of COVID-19 continues to ravage the world, it is important to understand how frontline clinicians manage ventilatory support and the various limiting factors. METHODS: An online survey composed of 32 questions was developed and validated by an international expert panel. RESULTS: Overall, 502 respondents from 40 countries across six continents completed the survey. The mean number (±SD) of ICU beds was 64 ± 84. The most popular initial diagnostic tools used for treatment initiation were arterial blood gas (48%) and clinical presentation (37.5%), while the national COVID-19 guidelines were the most used (61.2%). High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (53.8%), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (47%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (92%) were mostly used for mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 cases, respectively. However, only 38.8%, 56.6% and 82.9% of the respondents had standard protocols for HFNC, NIV, and IMV, respectively. The most frequently used modes of IMV and NIV were volume control (VC) (36.1%) and continuous positive airway pressure/pressure support (CPAP/PS) (40.6%). About 54% of the respondents did not adhere to the recommended, regular ventilator check interval. The majority of the respondents (85.7%) used proning with IMV, with 48.4% using it for 12–16 hours, and 46.2% had tried awake proning in combination with HFNC or NIV. Increased staff workload (45.02%), lack of trained staff (44.22%) and shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) (42.63%) were the main barriers to COVID-19 management. CONCLUSION: Our results show that general clinical practices involving ventilatory support were highly heterogeneous, with limited use of standard protocols and most frontline clinicians depending on isolated and varied management guidelines. We found increased staff workload, lack of trained staff and shortage of PPE to be the main limiting factors affecting global COVID-19 ventilatory support management. Dove 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7680685/ /pubmed/33239884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S279031 Text en © 2020 Alqahtani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alqahtani, Jaber S Mendes, Renata G Aldhahir, Abdulelah Rowley, Daniel AlAhmari, Mohammed D Ntoumenopoulos, George Alghamdi, Saeed M Sreedharan, Jithin K Aldabayan, Yousef S Oyelade, Tope Alrajeh, Ahmed Olivieri, Carlo AlQuaimi, Maher Sullivan, Jerome Almeshari, Mohammed A Esquinas, Antonio Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title | Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title_full | Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title_fullStr | Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title_short | Global Current Practices of Ventilatory Support Management in COVID-19 Patients: An International Survey |
title_sort | global current practices of ventilatory support management in covid-19 patients: an international survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S279031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alqahtanijabers globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT mendesrenatag globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT aldhahirabdulelah globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT rowleydaniel globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT alahmarimohammedd globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT ntoumenopoulosgeorge globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT alghamdisaeedm globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT sreedharanjithink globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT aldabayanyousefs globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT oyeladetope globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT alrajehahmed globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT oliviericarlo globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT alquaimimaher globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT sullivanjerome globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT almesharimohammeda globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey AT esquinasantonio globalcurrentpracticesofventilatorysupportmanagementincovid19patientsaninternationalsurvey |