Cargando…

Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics

Analysis of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples is an emerging field, which is performed with various methods and instruments based either on spectroscopy or thermoanalytical methods. In general, both approaches result in two different types of data sets that are either mass or particle numb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Primpke, Sebastian, Fischer, Marten, Lorenz, Claudia, Gerdts, Gunnar, Scholz-Böttcher, Barbara M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w
_version_ 1783612494611218432
author Primpke, Sebastian
Fischer, Marten
Lorenz, Claudia
Gerdts, Gunnar
Scholz-Böttcher, Barbara M.
author_facet Primpke, Sebastian
Fischer, Marten
Lorenz, Claudia
Gerdts, Gunnar
Scholz-Böttcher, Barbara M.
author_sort Primpke, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Analysis of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples is an emerging field, which is performed with various methods and instruments based either on spectroscopy or thermoanalytical methods. In general, both approaches result in two different types of data sets that are either mass or particle number related. Depending on detection limits of the respective method and instrumentation the derived polymer composition trends may vary. In this study, we compare the results of hyperspectral Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) imaging analysis and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) analysis performed on a set of environmental samples that differ in complexity and degree of microplastic contamination. The measurements were conducted consecutively, and on exactly the same sample. First, the samples were investigated with FTIR using aluminum oxide filters; subsequently, these were crushed, transferred to glass fiber filters, in pyrolysis cups, and measured via Py-GC/MS. After a general data harmonization step, the trends in MP contamination were thoroughly investigated with regard to the respective sample set and the derived polymer compositions. While the overall trends in MP contamination were very similar, differences were observed in the polymer compositions. Furthermore, polymer masses were empirically calculated from FTIR data and compared with the Py-GC/MS results. Here, a most plausible shape-related overestimation of the calculated polymer masses was observed in samples with larger particles and increased particle numbers. Taking into account the different measurement principles of both methods, all results were examined and discussed, and future needs for harmonization of intermethodological results were identified and highlighted. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76807482020-11-24 Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics Primpke, Sebastian Fischer, Marten Lorenz, Claudia Gerdts, Gunnar Scholz-Böttcher, Barbara M. Anal Bioanal Chem Paper in Forefront Analysis of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples is an emerging field, which is performed with various methods and instruments based either on spectroscopy or thermoanalytical methods. In general, both approaches result in two different types of data sets that are either mass or particle number related. Depending on detection limits of the respective method and instrumentation the derived polymer composition trends may vary. In this study, we compare the results of hyperspectral Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) imaging analysis and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) analysis performed on a set of environmental samples that differ in complexity and degree of microplastic contamination. The measurements were conducted consecutively, and on exactly the same sample. First, the samples were investigated with FTIR using aluminum oxide filters; subsequently, these were crushed, transferred to glass fiber filters, in pyrolysis cups, and measured via Py-GC/MS. After a general data harmonization step, the trends in MP contamination were thoroughly investigated with regard to the respective sample set and the derived polymer compositions. While the overall trends in MP contamination were very similar, differences were observed in the polymer compositions. Furthermore, polymer masses were empirically calculated from FTIR data and compared with the Py-GC/MS results. Here, a most plausible shape-related overestimation of the calculated polymer masses was observed in samples with larger particles and increased particle numbers. Taking into account the different measurement principles of both methods, all results were examined and discussed, and future needs for harmonization of intermethodological results were identified and highlighted. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7680748/ /pubmed/33104827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paper in Forefront
Primpke, Sebastian
Fischer, Marten
Lorenz, Claudia
Gerdts, Gunnar
Scholz-Böttcher, Barbara M.
Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title_full Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title_fullStr Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title_short Comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral FTIR imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
title_sort comparison of pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and hyperspectral ftir imaging spectroscopy for the analysis of microplastics
topic Paper in Forefront
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33104827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w
work_keys_str_mv AT primpkesebastian comparisonofpyrolysisgaschromatographymassspectrometryandhyperspectralftirimagingspectroscopyfortheanalysisofmicroplastics
AT fischermarten comparisonofpyrolysisgaschromatographymassspectrometryandhyperspectralftirimagingspectroscopyfortheanalysisofmicroplastics
AT lorenzclaudia comparisonofpyrolysisgaschromatographymassspectrometryandhyperspectralftirimagingspectroscopyfortheanalysisofmicroplastics
AT gerdtsgunnar comparisonofpyrolysisgaschromatographymassspectrometryandhyperspectralftirimagingspectroscopyfortheanalysisofmicroplastics
AT scholzbottcherbarbaram comparisonofpyrolysisgaschromatographymassspectrometryandhyperspectralftirimagingspectroscopyfortheanalysisofmicroplastics