Cargando…
“Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0 |
_version_ | 1783612509704421376 |
---|---|
author | Fujita, Masami Matsuoka, Sadatoshi Kiyohara, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Yousuke Takeda, Yuko Goishi, Norimichi Tarui, Masayoshi Inaba, Masaki Nagai, Mari Hachiya, Masahiko Fujita, Noriko |
author_facet | Fujita, Masami Matsuoka, Sadatoshi Kiyohara, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Yousuke Takeda, Yuko Goishi, Norimichi Tarui, Masayoshi Inaba, Masaki Nagai, Mari Hachiya, Masahiko Fujita, Noriko |
author_sort | Fujita, Masami |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of COVID-19 infection and progression, existing/urgent measures, and remaining challenges. Within the framework, nine groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan were classified into (i) “people without accommodation,” (ii) “people living in temporary or crisis accommodation,” and (iii) populations that include “people living in severely inadequate and insecure accommodation.” The assessment revealed that “staying at home” was physically and practically unattainable across groups. The study identified specific institutional, social, and cultural challenges apart from the common economic crisis, whereas the utilization of social welfare was low. Findings suggest that the rapid increase of groups classified as “(i)” and “(ii)” should be addressed by engaging stakeholders to enhance the availability and accessibility of social welfare and rescue measures, and to ensure safe and private accommodations for all groups. It is critical to enhance multi-sectoral collaboration in responding to the common and specific vulnerabilities of these population groups from health, socio-economic, and humanitarian perspectives. Under the pandemic, homelessness should be regarded less as a peculiar problem for specific populations but an extension of daily life. The framework can be a reference when planning the comprehensive yet concise assessment of populations with unstable housing in other countries to inform responses to the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7680823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76808232020-11-23 “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan Fujita, Masami Matsuoka, Sadatoshi Kiyohara, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Yousuke Takeda, Yuko Goishi, Norimichi Tarui, Masayoshi Inaba, Masaki Nagai, Mari Hachiya, Masahiko Fujita, Noriko Trop Med Health Review Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of COVID-19 infection and progression, existing/urgent measures, and remaining challenges. Within the framework, nine groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan were classified into (i) “people without accommodation,” (ii) “people living in temporary or crisis accommodation,” and (iii) populations that include “people living in severely inadequate and insecure accommodation.” The assessment revealed that “staying at home” was physically and practically unattainable across groups. The study identified specific institutional, social, and cultural challenges apart from the common economic crisis, whereas the utilization of social welfare was low. Findings suggest that the rapid increase of groups classified as “(i)” and “(ii)” should be addressed by engaging stakeholders to enhance the availability and accessibility of social welfare and rescue measures, and to ensure safe and private accommodations for all groups. It is critical to enhance multi-sectoral collaboration in responding to the common and specific vulnerabilities of these population groups from health, socio-economic, and humanitarian perspectives. Under the pandemic, homelessness should be regarded less as a peculiar problem for specific populations but an extension of daily life. The framework can be a reference when planning the comprehensive yet concise assessment of populations with unstable housing in other countries to inform responses to the pandemic. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7680823/ /pubmed/33292830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Fujita, Masami Matsuoka, Sadatoshi Kiyohara, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Yousuke Takeda, Yuko Goishi, Norimichi Tarui, Masayoshi Inaba, Masaki Nagai, Mari Hachiya, Masahiko Fujita, Noriko “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title | “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title_full | “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title_fullStr | “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title_short | “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan |
title_sort | “staying at home” to tackle covid-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in japan |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujitamasami stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT matsuokasadatoshi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT kiyoharahiroyuki stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT kumakurayousuke stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT takedayuko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT goishinorimichi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT taruimasayoshi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT inabamasaki stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT nagaimari stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT hachiyamasahiko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan AT fujitanoriko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan |