Cargando…

“Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan

Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Masami, Matsuoka, Sadatoshi, Kiyohara, Hiroyuki, Kumakura, Yousuke, Takeda, Yuko, Goishi, Norimichi, Tarui, Masayoshi, Inaba, Masaki, Nagai, Mari, Hachiya, Masahiko, Fujita, Noriko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0
_version_ 1783612509704421376
author Fujita, Masami
Matsuoka, Sadatoshi
Kiyohara, Hiroyuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Takeda, Yuko
Goishi, Norimichi
Tarui, Masayoshi
Inaba, Masaki
Nagai, Mari
Hachiya, Masahiko
Fujita, Noriko
author_facet Fujita, Masami
Matsuoka, Sadatoshi
Kiyohara, Hiroyuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Takeda, Yuko
Goishi, Norimichi
Tarui, Masayoshi
Inaba, Masaki
Nagai, Mari
Hachiya, Masahiko
Fujita, Noriko
author_sort Fujita, Masami
collection PubMed
description Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of COVID-19 infection and progression, existing/urgent measures, and remaining challenges. Within the framework, nine groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan were classified into (i) “people without accommodation,” (ii) “people living in temporary or crisis accommodation,” and (iii) populations that include “people living in severely inadequate and insecure accommodation.” The assessment revealed that “staying at home” was physically and practically unattainable across groups. The study identified specific institutional, social, and cultural challenges apart from the common economic crisis, whereas the utilization of social welfare was low. Findings suggest that the rapid increase of groups classified as “(i)” and “(ii)” should be addressed by engaging stakeholders to enhance the availability and accessibility of social welfare and rescue measures, and to ensure safe and private accommodations for all groups. It is critical to enhance multi-sectoral collaboration in responding to the common and specific vulnerabilities of these population groups from health, socio-economic, and humanitarian perspectives. Under the pandemic, homelessness should be regarded less as a peculiar problem for specific populations but an extension of daily life. The framework can be a reference when planning the comprehensive yet concise assessment of populations with unstable housing in other countries to inform responses to the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76808232020-11-23 “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan Fujita, Masami Matsuoka, Sadatoshi Kiyohara, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Yousuke Takeda, Yuko Goishi, Norimichi Tarui, Masayoshi Inaba, Masaki Nagai, Mari Hachiya, Masahiko Fujita, Noriko Trop Med Health Review Although the “stay-at-home” order is advocated against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the lives of individuals lacking adequate housing are threatened. We developed a framework to assess various populations with unstable housing in terms of socio-economic consequences of COVID-19, risk of COVID-19 infection and progression, existing/urgent measures, and remaining challenges. Within the framework, nine groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan were classified into (i) “people without accommodation,” (ii) “people living in temporary or crisis accommodation,” and (iii) populations that include “people living in severely inadequate and insecure accommodation.” The assessment revealed that “staying at home” was physically and practically unattainable across groups. The study identified specific institutional, social, and cultural challenges apart from the common economic crisis, whereas the utilization of social welfare was low. Findings suggest that the rapid increase of groups classified as “(i)” and “(ii)” should be addressed by engaging stakeholders to enhance the availability and accessibility of social welfare and rescue measures, and to ensure safe and private accommodations for all groups. It is critical to enhance multi-sectoral collaboration in responding to the common and specific vulnerabilities of these population groups from health, socio-economic, and humanitarian perspectives. Under the pandemic, homelessness should be regarded less as a peculiar problem for specific populations but an extension of daily life. The framework can be a reference when planning the comprehensive yet concise assessment of populations with unstable housing in other countries to inform responses to the pandemic. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7680823/ /pubmed/33292830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Fujita, Masami
Matsuoka, Sadatoshi
Kiyohara, Hiroyuki
Kumakura, Yousuke
Takeda, Yuko
Goishi, Norimichi
Tarui, Masayoshi
Inaba, Masaki
Nagai, Mari
Hachiya, Masahiko
Fujita, Noriko
“Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title_full “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title_fullStr “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title_full_unstemmed “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title_short “Staying at home” to tackle COVID-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? Cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in Japan
title_sort “staying at home” to tackle covid-19 pandemic: rhetoric or reality? cross-cutting analysis of nine population groups vulnerable to homelessness in japan
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00281-0
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitamasami stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT matsuokasadatoshi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT kiyoharahiroyuki stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT kumakurayousuke stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT takedayuko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT goishinorimichi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT taruimasayoshi stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT inabamasaki stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT nagaimari stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT hachiyamasahiko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan
AT fujitanoriko stayingathometotacklecovid19pandemicrhetoricorrealitycrosscuttinganalysisofninepopulationgroupsvulnerabletohomelessnessinjapan