Cargando…

Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory

Some authors have evaluated the unconstrained optimum and decorrelated multistage linear phenotypic selection indices (OMLPSI and DMLPSI, respectively) theory. We extended this index theory to the constrained multistage linear phenotypic selection index context, where we denoted OMLPSI and DMLPSI as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus, Toledo, Fernando H., Crossa, Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343016
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2019.04.0241
_version_ 1783612537191792640
author Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus
Toledo, Fernando H.
Crossa, Jose
author_facet Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus
Toledo, Fernando H.
Crossa, Jose
author_sort Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus
collection PubMed
description Some authors have evaluated the unconstrained optimum and decorrelated multistage linear phenotypic selection indices (OMLPSI and DMLPSI, respectively) theory. We extended this index theory to the constrained multistage linear phenotypic selection index context, where we denoted OMLPSI and DMLPSI as OCMLPSI and DCMLPSI, respectively. The OCMLPSI (DCMLPSI) is the most general multistage index and includes the OMLPSI (DMLPSI) as a particular case. The OCMLPSI (DCMLPSI) predicts the individual net genetic merit at different individual ages and allows imposing constraints on the genetic gains to make some traits change their mean values based on a predetermined level, while the rest of them remain without restrictions. The OCMLPSI takes into consideration the index correlation values among stages, whereas the DCMLPSI imposes the restriction that the index correlation values among stages be null. The criteria to evaluate OCMLPSI efficiency vs. DCMLPSI efficiency were that the total response of each index must be lower than or equal to the single-stage constrained linear phenotypic selection index response and that the expected genetic gain per trait values should be similar to the constraints imposed by the breeder. We used one real and one simulated dataset to validate the efficiency of the indices. The results indicated that OCMLPSI accuracy when predicting the selection response and expected genetic gain per trait was higher than DCMLPSI accuracy when predicting them. Thus, breeders should use the OCMLPSI when making a phenotypic selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7680945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76809452020-12-18 Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus Toledo, Fernando H. Crossa, Jose Crop Sci Research Some authors have evaluated the unconstrained optimum and decorrelated multistage linear phenotypic selection indices (OMLPSI and DMLPSI, respectively) theory. We extended this index theory to the constrained multistage linear phenotypic selection index context, where we denoted OMLPSI and DMLPSI as OCMLPSI and DCMLPSI, respectively. The OCMLPSI (DCMLPSI) is the most general multistage index and includes the OMLPSI (DMLPSI) as a particular case. The OCMLPSI (DCMLPSI) predicts the individual net genetic merit at different individual ages and allows imposing constraints on the genetic gains to make some traits change their mean values based on a predetermined level, while the rest of them remain without restrictions. The OCMLPSI takes into consideration the index correlation values among stages, whereas the DCMLPSI imposes the restriction that the index correlation values among stages be null. The criteria to evaluate OCMLPSI efficiency vs. DCMLPSI efficiency were that the total response of each index must be lower than or equal to the single-stage constrained linear phenotypic selection index response and that the expected genetic gain per trait values should be similar to the constraints imposed by the breeder. We used one real and one simulated dataset to validate the efficiency of the indices. The results indicated that OCMLPSI accuracy when predicting the selection response and expected genetic gain per trait was higher than DCMLPSI accuracy when predicting them. Thus, breeders should use the OCMLPSI when making a phenotypic selection. Oxford University Press 2019-10-31 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7680945/ /pubmed/33343016 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2019.04.0241 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Cerón-Rojas, J. Jesus
Toledo, Fernando H.
Crossa, Jose
Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title_full Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title_fullStr Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title_full_unstemmed Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title_short Optimum and Decorrelated Constrained Multistage Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices Theory
title_sort optimum and decorrelated constrained multistage linear phenotypic selection indices theory
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33343016
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2019.04.0241
work_keys_str_mv AT ceronrojasjjesus optimumanddecorrelatedconstrainedmultistagelinearphenotypicselectionindicestheory
AT toledofernandoh optimumanddecorrelatedconstrainedmultistagelinearphenotypicselectionindicestheory
AT crossajose optimumanddecorrelatedconstrainedmultistagelinearphenotypicselectionindicestheory