Cargando…

Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA

PURPOSE: To examine research participants’ levels of satisfaction and perceptions and aid researchers to better engage research volunteers from all racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials. A participant satisfaction survey was developed that focused on three domains to reflect satisfaction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adler, Priscilla, Otado, Jane, Kwagyan, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7681123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.20
_version_ 1783612572526706688
author Adler, Priscilla
Otado, Jane
Kwagyan, John
author_facet Adler, Priscilla
Otado, Jane
Kwagyan, John
author_sort Adler, Priscilla
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine research participants’ levels of satisfaction and perceptions and aid researchers to better engage research volunteers from all racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials. A participant satisfaction survey was developed that focused on three domains to reflect satisfaction with delivery of care, environment, and center operations. In addition, the survey contained open-ended questions to reflect overall experiences and perceptions. Two hundred and seventy-eight participants (55% African American and 29% non-Hispanic Whites) with an average age of 52 years completed the survey. RESULTS: The results indicated that the majority of the participants rated their satisfaction very highly across all domains. Ninety percent stated they were very satisfied/satisfied or very strongly agreed/agreed in the three domains. Obtaining high-quality care/access to health care professionals (60%), learning more about their illness/disease (60%), and helping others (57%) were noted as important factors in choosing to participate in a trial. Regarding overall experience, majority of respondents stated that friendliness, expertise of staff, learning more about their disease, and contributing to science were important. Further, financial compensation was not a primary motivation for participation. A majority of participants stated that they would participate in future studies and would recommend a friend or a family member to participate in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the degree of satisfaction with the research staff and with the specific trial itself are important determinants for enrolling, completing a study, and for participating in future trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7681123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76811232020-11-25 Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA Adler, Priscilla Otado, Jane Kwagyan, John J Clin Transl Sci Research Article PURPOSE: To examine research participants’ levels of satisfaction and perceptions and aid researchers to better engage research volunteers from all racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials. A participant satisfaction survey was developed that focused on three domains to reflect satisfaction with delivery of care, environment, and center operations. In addition, the survey contained open-ended questions to reflect overall experiences and perceptions. Two hundred and seventy-eight participants (55% African American and 29% non-Hispanic Whites) with an average age of 52 years completed the survey. RESULTS: The results indicated that the majority of the participants rated their satisfaction very highly across all domains. Ninety percent stated they were very satisfied/satisfied or very strongly agreed/agreed in the three domains. Obtaining high-quality care/access to health care professionals (60%), learning more about their illness/disease (60%), and helping others (57%) were noted as important factors in choosing to participate in a trial. Regarding overall experience, majority of respondents stated that friendliness, expertise of staff, learning more about their disease, and contributing to science were important. Further, financial compensation was not a primary motivation for participation. A majority of participants stated that they would participate in future studies and would recommend a friend or a family member to participate in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the degree of satisfaction with the research staff and with the specific trial itself are important determinants for enrolling, completing a study, and for participating in future trials. Cambridge University Press 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7681123/ /pubmed/33244412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.20 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adler, Priscilla
Otado, Jane
Kwagyan, John
Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title_full Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title_fullStr Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title_short Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA
title_sort satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: an urban multi-institution with ctsa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7681123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.20
work_keys_str_mv AT adlerpriscilla satisfactionandperceptionsofresearchparticipantsinclinicalandtranslationalstudiesanurbanmultiinstitutionwithctsa
AT otadojane satisfactionandperceptionsofresearchparticipantsinclinicalandtranslationalstudiesanurbanmultiinstitutionwithctsa
AT kwagyanjohn satisfactionandperceptionsofresearchparticipantsinclinicalandtranslationalstudiesanurbanmultiinstitutionwithctsa