Cargando…

Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19

PURPOSE: To review the existing available information regarding urolithiasis management and the impact of COVID-19 on this, and propose recommendations for management of emergency urolithiasis presentations in the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Review of published guidelines produced by Urological Governing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heijkoop, B., Galiabovitch, E., York, N., Webb, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7681178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7
_version_ 1783612585450405888
author Heijkoop, B.
Galiabovitch, E.
York, N.
Webb, D.
author_facet Heijkoop, B.
Galiabovitch, E.
York, N.
Webb, D.
author_sort Heijkoop, B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review the existing available information regarding urolithiasis management and the impact of COVID-19 on this, and propose recommendations for management of emergency urolithiasis presentations in the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Review of published guidelines produced by Urological Governing Bodies, followed by the literature review regarding urolithiasis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Consistent recommendations across guidelines and literature were that urolithiasis with concurrent sepsis or renal failure remains a urological emergency warranting urgent intervention within the pandemic environment. Ureteric stenting and percutaneous nephrostomy are considered equivalent for decompression in this setting, with both ideally to be performed under local anaesthesia where possible to spare ventilators and reduce aerosol-generating procedures. Greater utilization of medical expulsive therapy and dissolution chemolysis may occur during the pandemic, and longer indwelling stent times may be accepted while definite stone clearance is deferred. CONCLUSIONS: Urolithiasis will continue to be a source of emergency presentations requiring urgent intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is possible to limit these interventions to decompression of the collecting system in the setting of concurrent obstruction or infection, performed under local anaesthesia to limit use of resources and minimise aerosol-generating procedures, with deferral of definitive management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7681178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76811782020-11-23 Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19 Heijkoop, B. Galiabovitch, E. York, N. Webb, D. World J Urol Topic Paper PURPOSE: To review the existing available information regarding urolithiasis management and the impact of COVID-19 on this, and propose recommendations for management of emergency urolithiasis presentations in the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Review of published guidelines produced by Urological Governing Bodies, followed by the literature review regarding urolithiasis management during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Consistent recommendations across guidelines and literature were that urolithiasis with concurrent sepsis or renal failure remains a urological emergency warranting urgent intervention within the pandemic environment. Ureteric stenting and percutaneous nephrostomy are considered equivalent for decompression in this setting, with both ideally to be performed under local anaesthesia where possible to spare ventilators and reduce aerosol-generating procedures. Greater utilization of medical expulsive therapy and dissolution chemolysis may occur during the pandemic, and longer indwelling stent times may be accepted while definite stone clearance is deferred. CONCLUSIONS: Urolithiasis will continue to be a source of emergency presentations requiring urgent intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is possible to limit these interventions to decompression of the collecting system in the setting of concurrent obstruction or infection, performed under local anaesthesia to limit use of resources and minimise aerosol-generating procedures, with deferral of definitive management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7681178/ /pubmed/33226444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Topic Paper
Heijkoop, B.
Galiabovitch, E.
York, N.
Webb, D.
Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title_full Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title_fullStr Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title_short Consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during COVID-19
title_sort consensus of multiple national guidelines: agreed strategies for initial stone management during covid-19
topic Topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7681178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03491-7
work_keys_str_mv AT heijkoopb consensusofmultiplenationalguidelinesagreedstrategiesforinitialstonemanagementduringcovid19
AT galiabovitche consensusofmultiplenationalguidelinesagreedstrategiesforinitialstonemanagementduringcovid19
AT yorkn consensusofmultiplenationalguidelinesagreedstrategiesforinitialstonemanagementduringcovid19
AT webbd consensusofmultiplenationalguidelinesagreedstrategiesforinitialstonemanagementduringcovid19