Cargando…

The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND: While immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the field of oncology for advanced-stage cancers, they can lead to serious immune toxicities. Several systematic reviews have evaluated the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs); however, most have focused on published ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karimian, Zahra, Mavoungou, Sandra, Salem, Joe-Elie, Tubach, Florence, Dechartres, Agnès
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07518-5
_version_ 1783612635963457536
author Karimian, Zahra
Mavoungou, Sandra
Salem, Joe-Elie
Tubach, Florence
Dechartres, Agnès
author_facet Karimian, Zahra
Mavoungou, Sandra
Salem, Joe-Elie
Tubach, Florence
Dechartres, Agnès
author_sort Karimian, Zahra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the field of oncology for advanced-stage cancers, they can lead to serious immune toxicities. Several systematic reviews have evaluated the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs); however, most have focused on published articles without evaluating trial registries. The objective of this methodological review was to compare the quality of reporting of safety information and in particular, serious irAEs (irSAEs), in both publications and ClinicalTrials.gov for all current FDA-approved ICIs. METHODS: PubMed was searched to retrieve all published phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs. For each eligible trial, we searched for corresponding registration on ClinicalTrials.gov and extracted relevant safety data from both the publication and results posted on registry. We then compared the quality of reporting and the value of safety data between both sources. RESULTS: Of 42 eligible published trials, 34 had results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Considerable variability was noted in the reporting of safety in both sources. SAEs were reported for all trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov compared to 23.5% of publications. An overall incidence for irAEs and irSAEs was reported in 58.8 and 8.8% of publications respectively, compared to 11.8 and 5.9% in registry results. Comparing the value of specific irSAEs was not possible between the two sources in 32/34 trials either due to different reporting formats (61.8%) or data not being reported in one or both sources (32.4%). From the 2 studies with compatible irSAE format, only 1 had matching data in both sources. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of irAEs / irSAEs varies considerably in publications and registries, which outlines the importance of standardizing the terminologies and methodologies for reporting safety information relevant to ICIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7682068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76820682020-11-23 The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors Karimian, Zahra Mavoungou, Sandra Salem, Joe-Elie Tubach, Florence Dechartres, Agnès BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: While immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the field of oncology for advanced-stage cancers, they can lead to serious immune toxicities. Several systematic reviews have evaluated the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs); however, most have focused on published articles without evaluating trial registries. The objective of this methodological review was to compare the quality of reporting of safety information and in particular, serious irAEs (irSAEs), in both publications and ClinicalTrials.gov for all current FDA-approved ICIs. METHODS: PubMed was searched to retrieve all published phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs. For each eligible trial, we searched for corresponding registration on ClinicalTrials.gov and extracted relevant safety data from both the publication and results posted on registry. We then compared the quality of reporting and the value of safety data between both sources. RESULTS: Of 42 eligible published trials, 34 had results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Considerable variability was noted in the reporting of safety in both sources. SAEs were reported for all trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov compared to 23.5% of publications. An overall incidence for irAEs and irSAEs was reported in 58.8 and 8.8% of publications respectively, compared to 11.8 and 5.9% in registry results. Comparing the value of specific irSAEs was not possible between the two sources in 32/34 trials either due to different reporting formats (61.8%) or data not being reported in one or both sources (32.4%). From the 2 studies with compatible irSAE format, only 1 had matching data in both sources. CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of irAEs / irSAEs varies considerably in publications and registries, which outlines the importance of standardizing the terminologies and methodologies for reporting safety information relevant to ICIs. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7682068/ /pubmed/33225901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07518-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karimian, Zahra
Mavoungou, Sandra
Salem, Joe-Elie
Tubach, Florence
Dechartres, Agnès
The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_fullStr The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_short The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_sort quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of fda-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07518-5
work_keys_str_mv AT karimianzahra thequalityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT mavoungousandra thequalityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT salemjoeelie thequalityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT tubachflorence thequalityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dechartresagnes thequalityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT karimianzahra qualityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT mavoungousandra qualityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT salemjoeelie qualityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT tubachflorence qualityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dechartresagnes qualityofreportinggeneralsafetyparametersandimmunerelatedadverseeventsinclinicaltrialsoffdaapprovedimmunecheckpointinhibitors