Cargando…
La valutazione del benessere organizzativo: una integrazione del questionario ANAC (Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione)
«The evaluation of organizational well-being in the public sector: an integration of the ANAC questionnaire». BACKGROUND: In Italy, the work-related stress and organizational well-being evaluation is subject to specific norms and regulations. The Italian National Anti-Corruption Authority (Autorità...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885 srl
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29701629 http://dx.doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v109i2.6669 |
Sumario: | «The evaluation of organizational well-being in the public sector: an integration of the ANAC questionnaire». BACKGROUND: In Italy, the work-related stress and organizational well-being evaluation is subject to specific norms and regulations. The Italian National Anti-Corruption Authority (Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione - ANAC) has developed a questionnaire to assess the organizational well-being of the employees in Public Administration Institutions. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to analyse, according to the Job Demands-Resources Theory, the relationship between some job demands (workload, discrimination) and job resources (supervisors and colleagues support, job autonomy, fairness, career opportunities, membership), and some outcomes (work-related stress, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction). METHODS: The research involved a public administration and was conducted through a self-report questionnaire (N=414, 60% of the employees). The ANAC questionnaire was integrated with measures from national and international literature on the topic of well-being and stress at work. RESULTS: Multiple regression analyses highlighted the relationship between outcomes, job demands and resources. Work-related stress showed a positive relation with demands (work load β coefficient=0.22; perceived discrimination β=0.14) and a negative one with some resources (supervisors’ support β=-0.21 and membership β=-0.11). Emotional exhaustion had a negative relationship with some job resources, specifically career opportunities (β=-0.14), autonomy (β=-0.21) and membership (β=-0.25). Job satisfaction showed a positive relationship with all job resources considered. CONCLUSIONS: The study seeks to integrate the assessment of well-being and work-related stress thus highlighting the importance of linking the different outcomes with job demands and resources. The results identify possible practices to promote well-being in the organization. |
---|