Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasound in Sjögren’s syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasound in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify diagnostic or validation studies in patients with pSS meeting t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsubeik, Karishma, Motilal, Shastri, Sanchez-Ramos, Luis, Ramrattan, Laurie Ann, Kaeley, Gurjit S., Singh, Jasvinder A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20973560
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasound in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify diagnostic or validation studies in patients with pSS meeting the diagnostic criteria. A diagnostic test meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and the diagnostic odds ratio. Meta-regression analyses were done for several pSS covariates. RESULTS: Sixty-five studies met our criteria for the qualitative review. Fifty-four studies with a total of 6087 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity for salivary gland ultrasound was 80% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77–83%; I(2) = 78%], and specificity was 90% (95% CI: 87–92%; I(2) = 76%). The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8 (95% CI: 6.4–10) and 0.22 (95% CI: 0.19–0.25), respectively. The corresponding pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 37 (95% CI: 28–48). Separate meta-regression models resulted in similar diagnostic estimates: (a) adjusted for mean age: sensitivity 81% (95% CI:77–84%; I(2) = 99%) and specificity 90% (95% CI: 87–93%; I(2) = 99%); (b) adjusted for mean disease duration, sensitivity 79% (95% CI:72–84%; I(2) = 99%), and specificity 90% (89–94%; I(2) = 99%). The diagnostic estimates were robust to sensitivity analyses by quality criteria, pSS diagnostic criteria and ultrasound scoring systems. CONCLUSION: Salivary gland ultrasound is a valuable modality for the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome. It is plausible that salivary gland ultrasound can be used as an important criterion for the diagnosis of pSS.