Cargando…

Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects

PURPOSE: Education as part of medical education is currently changing rapidly. Not least because of the corona crisis, more and more digital teaching formats and innovative teaching concepts such as the flipped classroom model are finding their way into teaching. We analyzed the acceptance and effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dapper, Hendrik, Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo, Rathfelder, Salome, Mosene, Katharina, von Kirchbauer, Isabelle, Bernhardt, Denise, Berberat, Pascal O., Combs, Stephanie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33230568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01712-x
_version_ 1783612703824150528
author Dapper, Hendrik
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Rathfelder, Salome
Mosene, Katharina
von Kirchbauer, Isabelle
Bernhardt, Denise
Berberat, Pascal O.
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_facet Dapper, Hendrik
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Rathfelder, Salome
Mosene, Katharina
von Kirchbauer, Isabelle
Bernhardt, Denise
Berberat, Pascal O.
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_sort Dapper, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Education as part of medical education is currently changing rapidly. Not least because of the corona crisis, more and more digital teaching formats and innovative teaching concepts such as the flipped classroom model are finding their way into teaching. We analyzed the acceptance and effectiveness of traditional teaching methods as well as the interest in innovative e‑learning methods among medical students in the field of radiation oncology at the medical school of the Technical University of Munich. METHODS: We carried out an online-based survey as well as a knowledge test on all students from two terms who had completed the seminar series of radiation oncology. The survey comprised seven questions on the frequency of participation, acceptance, and judgment of the effectiveness in terms of learning and on a potential use of e‑learning methods using a six-point Likert scale. The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: Traditional teaching methods are largely accepted by students and most students consider the current learning format to be effective in terms of the teaching effect in the field of radiation oncology. However, only about 50% of all knowledge questions were answered correctly. The possible use of e‑learning methods was judged critically or desired in roughly equal parts among the students. CONCLUSION: Traditional seminars enjoy a high level of acceptance among students. Effectiveness with regard to the internalization of content taught, however, should be increased. After all, the future seems to lie in the integration of e‑learning in the form of educational videos and practical seminars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7682521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76825212020-11-24 Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects Dapper, Hendrik Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo Rathfelder, Salome Mosene, Katharina von Kirchbauer, Isabelle Bernhardt, Denise Berberat, Pascal O. Combs, Stephanie E. Strahlenther Onkol Original Article PURPOSE: Education as part of medical education is currently changing rapidly. Not least because of the corona crisis, more and more digital teaching formats and innovative teaching concepts such as the flipped classroom model are finding their way into teaching. We analyzed the acceptance and effectiveness of traditional teaching methods as well as the interest in innovative e‑learning methods among medical students in the field of radiation oncology at the medical school of the Technical University of Munich. METHODS: We carried out an online-based survey as well as a knowledge test on all students from two terms who had completed the seminar series of radiation oncology. The survey comprised seven questions on the frequency of participation, acceptance, and judgment of the effectiveness in terms of learning and on a potential use of e‑learning methods using a six-point Likert scale. The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: Traditional teaching methods are largely accepted by students and most students consider the current learning format to be effective in terms of the teaching effect in the field of radiation oncology. However, only about 50% of all knowledge questions were answered correctly. The possible use of e‑learning methods was judged critically or desired in roughly equal parts among the students. CONCLUSION: Traditional seminars enjoy a high level of acceptance among students. Effectiveness with regard to the internalization of content taught, however, should be increased. After all, the future seems to lie in the integration of e‑learning in the form of educational videos and practical seminars. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7682521/ /pubmed/33230568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01712-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dapper, Hendrik
Wijnen-Meijer, Marjo
Rathfelder, Salome
Mosene, Katharina
von Kirchbauer, Isabelle
Bernhardt, Denise
Berberat, Pascal O.
Combs, Stephanie E.
Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title_full Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title_fullStr Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title_full_unstemmed Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title_short Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
title_sort radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7682521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33230568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01712-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dapperhendrik radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT wijnenmeijermarjo radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT rathfeldersalome radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT mosenekatharina radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT vonkirchbauerisabelle radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT bernhardtdenise radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT berberatpascalo radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects
AT combsstephaniee radiationoncologyaspartofmedicaleducationcurrentstatusandpossibledigitalfutureprospects