Cargando…

Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of ovarian metastasis and the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes for early-stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer. METHODS: 281 patients with stages IA2-IB1 adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer who underwent radical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theplib, Arisa, Hanprasertpong, Jitti, Leetanaporn, Kittinun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5791381
_version_ 1783612811548557312
author Theplib, Arisa
Hanprasertpong, Jitti
Leetanaporn, Kittinun
author_facet Theplib, Arisa
Hanprasertpong, Jitti
Leetanaporn, Kittinun
author_sort Theplib, Arisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of ovarian metastasis and the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes for early-stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer. METHODS: 281 patients with stages IA2-IB1 adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHND) were included in the study. The incidence of ovarian metastasis was evaluated from 173 patients who underwent oophorectomy during RHND. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients less than 50 years (196 of 281 patients) who were classified into two groups, ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. 5-year recurrence-free survival (5-yr RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS) were evaluated and compared between these groups. RESULTS: There was no evidence of ovarian metastasis, synchronous ovarian cancer, or ovarian recurrence during follow-up. In patients less than 50 years of age, there were no statistically significant differences in the 5-yr RFS (P = 0.363), or 5-yr OS (P = 0.974) between the ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, the ovarian preservation group seemed to have a slightly better OS in long-term follow-up (after 15 years); however, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian preservation was safe in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer stages IA2-B1. However, the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes needs to be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7683125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76831252020-12-02 Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer Theplib, Arisa Hanprasertpong, Jitti Leetanaporn, Kittinun Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of ovarian metastasis and the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes for early-stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer. METHODS: 281 patients with stages IA2-IB1 adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHND) were included in the study. The incidence of ovarian metastasis was evaluated from 173 patients who underwent oophorectomy during RHND. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients less than 50 years (196 of 281 patients) who were classified into two groups, ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. 5-year recurrence-free survival (5-yr RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS) were evaluated and compared between these groups. RESULTS: There was no evidence of ovarian metastasis, synchronous ovarian cancer, or ovarian recurrence during follow-up. In patients less than 50 years of age, there were no statistically significant differences in the 5-yr RFS (P = 0.363), or 5-yr OS (P = 0.974) between the ovarian preservation and nonovarian preservation groups. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, the ovarian preservation group seemed to have a slightly better OS in long-term follow-up (after 15 years); however, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian preservation was safe in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer stages IA2-B1. However, the impact of ovarian preservation on oncological outcomes needs to be further investigated. Hindawi 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7683125/ /pubmed/33274215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5791381 Text en Copyright © 2020 Arisa Theplib et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Theplib, Arisa
Hanprasertpong, Jitti
Leetanaporn, Kittinun
Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title_full Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title_short Safety and Prognostic Impacts of Ovarian Preservation during Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Cervical Cancer
title_sort safety and prognostic impacts of ovarian preservation during radical hysterectomy for early-stage adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5791381
work_keys_str_mv AT theplibarisa safetyandprognosticimpactsofovarianpreservationduringradicalhysterectomyforearlystageadenocarcinomaandadenosquamouscervicalcancer
AT hanprasertpongjitti safetyandprognosticimpactsofovarianpreservationduringradicalhysterectomyforearlystageadenocarcinomaandadenosquamouscervicalcancer
AT leetanapornkittinun safetyandprognosticimpactsofovarianpreservationduringradicalhysterectomyforearlystageadenocarcinomaandadenosquamouscervicalcancer