Cargando…
Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk
Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y |
_version_ | 1783612878974091264 |
---|---|
author | Eccard, Jana A. Liesenjohann, Thilo Dammhahn, Melanie |
author_facet | Eccard, Jana A. Liesenjohann, Thilo Dammhahn, Melanie |
author_sort | Eccard, Jana A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource exploitation remain unexplained. Using single foragers in artificial landscapes of perceived risks and resources with diminishing returns, we aimed to test whether foraging behaviour and resource exploitation are adjusted to risk level, vary with risk during different components of foraging, and (co)vary among individuals. We quantified foraging behaviour and resource exploitation for 21 common voles (Microtus arvalis). By manipulating ground cover, we created simple landscapes of two food patches varying in perceived risk during feeding in a patch and/or while travelling between patches. Foraging of individuals was variable and adjusted to risk level and type. High risk during feeding reduced feeding duration and food consumption more strongly than risk while travelling. Risk during travelling modified the risk effects of feeding for changes between patches and resulting evenness of resource exploitation. Across risk conditions individuals differed consistently in when and how long they exploited resources and exposed themselves to risk. These among-individual differences in foraging behaviour were associated with consistent patterns of resource exploitation. Thus, different strategies in foraging-under-risk ultimately lead to unequal payoffs and might affect lower trophic levels in food webs. Inter-individual differences in foraging behaviour, i.e. foraging personalities, are an integral part of foraging behaviour and need to be fully integrated into optimal foraging theory. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7683444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76834442020-11-30 Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk Eccard, Jana A. Liesenjohann, Thilo Dammhahn, Melanie Oecologia Behavioral Ecology–Original Research Foraging is risky and involves balancing the benefits of resource acquisition with costs of predation. Optimal foraging theory predicts where, when and how long to forage in a given spatiotemporal distribution of risks and resources. However, significant variation in foraging behaviour and resource exploitation remain unexplained. Using single foragers in artificial landscapes of perceived risks and resources with diminishing returns, we aimed to test whether foraging behaviour and resource exploitation are adjusted to risk level, vary with risk during different components of foraging, and (co)vary among individuals. We quantified foraging behaviour and resource exploitation for 21 common voles (Microtus arvalis). By manipulating ground cover, we created simple landscapes of two food patches varying in perceived risk during feeding in a patch and/or while travelling between patches. Foraging of individuals was variable and adjusted to risk level and type. High risk during feeding reduced feeding duration and food consumption more strongly than risk while travelling. Risk during travelling modified the risk effects of feeding for changes between patches and resulting evenness of resource exploitation. Across risk conditions individuals differed consistently in when and how long they exploited resources and exposed themselves to risk. These among-individual differences in foraging behaviour were associated with consistent patterns of resource exploitation. Thus, different strategies in foraging-under-risk ultimately lead to unequal payoffs and might affect lower trophic levels in food webs. Inter-individual differences in foraging behaviour, i.e. foraging personalities, are an integral part of foraging behaviour and need to be fully integrated into optimal foraging theory. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7683444/ /pubmed/33141325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Behavioral Ecology–Original Research Eccard, Jana A. Liesenjohann, Thilo Dammhahn, Melanie Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title | Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title_full | Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title_fullStr | Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title_short | Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
title_sort | among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk |
topic | Behavioral Ecology–Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04773-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eccardjanaa amongindividualdifferencesinforagingmodulateresourceexploitationunderperceivedpredationrisk AT liesenjohannthilo amongindividualdifferencesinforagingmodulateresourceexploitationunderperceivedpredationrisk AT dammhahnmelanie amongindividualdifferencesinforagingmodulateresourceexploitationunderperceivedpredationrisk |