Cargando…

Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity

BACKGROUND: In order to correct upper lid laxity, upper blepharoplasty, subbrow excision, and forehead lift have been utilized. Our newly developed subbrow excision attaches the orbicularis oculi muscle to the frontalis muscle. This improves the longevity of the result without inhibiting the gliding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hong Seok, Kim, Kenneth K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01879-9
_version_ 1783612885390327808
author Kim, Hong Seok
Kim, Kenneth K.
author_facet Kim, Hong Seok
Kim, Kenneth K.
author_sort Kim, Hong Seok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to correct upper lid laxity, upper blepharoplasty, subbrow excision, and forehead lift have been utilized. Our newly developed subbrow excision attaches the orbicularis oculi muscle to the frontalis muscle. This improves the longevity of the result without inhibiting the gliding plane of the periorbita. METHOD: From January 2016 to July 2018, 564 patients were operated on using this technique. Among them, 41 were male and 523 were female with the average age of 59.5 years. The average size of the subbrow excision was 55 mm × 8 mm. From the upper skin incision site, the upper dissection proceeded cephalad in the subcutaneous plane just above the orbicularis oculi muscle to the point where the frontalis muscle was seen. The lower flap was created by incising the orbicularis oculi muscle 5 mm cephalad to the distal skin incision. From this 5-mm orbicularis muscle stump, the dissection proceeded caudally in a plane between the orbicularis muscle and the orbital septum. Once this flap was created, the 5-mm muscle stump was attached to the exposed frontalis muscle in a horizontal mattress fashion in three areas. The skin incision was then closed. Three months after the operation, a satisfaction survey was conducted using the Likert scale. RESULTS: The patients were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. In all but two cases, the orbital laxity improved. However, in the brow’s lateral third where the frontalis muscle does not exist, a slight lowering of the brow had occurred. The incision healed well without any keloid or hypertrophic scars. There were no significant complications such as superior orbital nerve entrapment-related sensory problems. CONCLUSIONS: Subbrow lift utilizing the frontalis muscle attachment to the lower flap orbicularis muscle is a novel method of correcting upper eyelid skin hooding. The technique does not rely on periosteal fixation. Therefore, the eyebrow gliding plane is not violated. Thus, the natural eyebrow movement is maintained. There were no cases of injury to the deep branch of the supraorbital nerve, poor wound healing, or other significant complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7683472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76834722020-11-30 Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity Kim, Hong Seok Kim, Kenneth K. Aesthetic Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: In order to correct upper lid laxity, upper blepharoplasty, subbrow excision, and forehead lift have been utilized. Our newly developed subbrow excision attaches the orbicularis oculi muscle to the frontalis muscle. This improves the longevity of the result without inhibiting the gliding plane of the periorbita. METHOD: From January 2016 to July 2018, 564 patients were operated on using this technique. Among them, 41 were male and 523 were female with the average age of 59.5 years. The average size of the subbrow excision was 55 mm × 8 mm. From the upper skin incision site, the upper dissection proceeded cephalad in the subcutaneous plane just above the orbicularis oculi muscle to the point where the frontalis muscle was seen. The lower flap was created by incising the orbicularis oculi muscle 5 mm cephalad to the distal skin incision. From this 5-mm orbicularis muscle stump, the dissection proceeded caudally in a plane between the orbicularis muscle and the orbital septum. Once this flap was created, the 5-mm muscle stump was attached to the exposed frontalis muscle in a horizontal mattress fashion in three areas. The skin incision was then closed. Three months after the operation, a satisfaction survey was conducted using the Likert scale. RESULTS: The patients were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. In all but two cases, the orbital laxity improved. However, in the brow’s lateral third where the frontalis muscle does not exist, a slight lowering of the brow had occurred. The incision healed well without any keloid or hypertrophic scars. There were no significant complications such as superior orbital nerve entrapment-related sensory problems. CONCLUSIONS: Subbrow lift utilizing the frontalis muscle attachment to the lower flap orbicularis muscle is a novel method of correcting upper eyelid skin hooding. The technique does not rely on periosteal fixation. Therefore, the eyebrow gliding plane is not violated. Thus, the natural eyebrow movement is maintained. There were no cases of injury to the deep branch of the supraorbital nerve, poor wound healing, or other significant complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Springer US 2020-07-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7683472/ /pubmed/32710200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01879-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hong Seok
Kim, Kenneth K.
Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title_full Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title_fullStr Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title_full_unstemmed Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title_short Subbrow Lift Using Frontalis Sling to Correct Lateral Orbital Laxity
title_sort subbrow lift using frontalis sling to correct lateral orbital laxity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01879-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhongseok subbrowliftusingfrontalisslingtocorrectlateralorbitallaxity
AT kimkennethk subbrowliftusingfrontalisslingtocorrectlateralorbitallaxity