Cargando…

In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria

Alternative antimicrobials require a deep understanding of their action mechanisms by in vitro assays which support science-based field use. This study focuses on the characterization of bactericidal mechanisms of potential antimicrobial compounds, two organic acids and three single essential oil (E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez-García, Manuel, Argüello, Héctor, Puente, Héctor, Mencía-Ares, Óscar, González, Sandra, Miranda, Rubén, Rubio, Pedro, Carvajal, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.572947
_version_ 1783612919217389568
author Gómez-García, Manuel
Argüello, Héctor
Puente, Héctor
Mencía-Ares, Óscar
González, Sandra
Miranda, Rubén
Rubio, Pedro
Carvajal, Ana
author_facet Gómez-García, Manuel
Argüello, Héctor
Puente, Héctor
Mencía-Ares, Óscar
González, Sandra
Miranda, Rubén
Rubio, Pedro
Carvajal, Ana
author_sort Gómez-García, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Alternative antimicrobials require a deep understanding of their action mechanisms by in vitro assays which support science-based field use. This study focuses on the characterization of bactericidal mechanisms of potential antimicrobial compounds, two organic acids and three single essential oil (EO) compounds against swine enteropathogenic bacteria Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Clostridium perfringens. Target concentrations of the compounds were evaluated using the inhibitory potential of the vapor phase and bacterial viability after short-term exposure, while cell targets were disclosed using flow cytometry (FC), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All tested compounds exhibited vapor phase activity against the three bacterial species, except sodium salt of coconut fatty acid distillates against C. perfringens. Survival test results evidenced that effects on bacterial viability were concentration dependent and higher in single EO compounds than in organic acids. In detail, thymol and its isomer carvacrol were the most effective compounds. Further characterization of thymol and cinnamaldehyde activity revealed that thymol main target was the cell membrane, since it caused striking damages in the membrane permeability, integrity and composition evidenced by FC and FTIR in the three enteric pathogens. In contrast, cinnamaldehyde was more effective against enterobacteria than against C. perfringens and only caused slightly damages at the highest concentration tested. Its target at the molecular level differed between enterobacteria and C. perfringens isolates. The SEM micrographs allowed us to confirm the results previously obtained for both EO compounds by other techniques. Altogether, the study showed the straight effect of these antimicrobials, which could constitute relevant information to optimize their feed inclusion rates in field studies or field use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7683615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76836152020-11-24 In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria Gómez-García, Manuel Argüello, Héctor Puente, Héctor Mencía-Ares, Óscar González, Sandra Miranda, Rubén Rubio, Pedro Carvajal, Ana Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Alternative antimicrobials require a deep understanding of their action mechanisms by in vitro assays which support science-based field use. This study focuses on the characterization of bactericidal mechanisms of potential antimicrobial compounds, two organic acids and three single essential oil (EO) compounds against swine enteropathogenic bacteria Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Clostridium perfringens. Target concentrations of the compounds were evaluated using the inhibitory potential of the vapor phase and bacterial viability after short-term exposure, while cell targets were disclosed using flow cytometry (FC), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All tested compounds exhibited vapor phase activity against the three bacterial species, except sodium salt of coconut fatty acid distillates against C. perfringens. Survival test results evidenced that effects on bacterial viability were concentration dependent and higher in single EO compounds than in organic acids. In detail, thymol and its isomer carvacrol were the most effective compounds. Further characterization of thymol and cinnamaldehyde activity revealed that thymol main target was the cell membrane, since it caused striking damages in the membrane permeability, integrity and composition evidenced by FC and FTIR in the three enteric pathogens. In contrast, cinnamaldehyde was more effective against enterobacteria than against C. perfringens and only caused slightly damages at the highest concentration tested. Its target at the molecular level differed between enterobacteria and C. perfringens isolates. The SEM micrographs allowed us to confirm the results previously obtained for both EO compounds by other techniques. Altogether, the study showed the straight effect of these antimicrobials, which could constitute relevant information to optimize their feed inclusion rates in field studies or field use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7683615/ /pubmed/33240953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.572947 Text en Copyright © 2020 Gómez-García, Argüello, Puente, Mencía-Ares, González, Miranda, Rubio and Carvajal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Gómez-García, Manuel
Argüello, Héctor
Puente, Héctor
Mencía-Ares, Óscar
González, Sandra
Miranda, Rubén
Rubio, Pedro
Carvajal, Ana
In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title_full In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title_fullStr In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title_short In-depth in vitro Evaluation of the Activity and Mechanisms of Action of Organic Acids and Essential Oils Against Swine Enteropathogenic Bacteria
title_sort in-depth in vitro evaluation of the activity and mechanisms of action of organic acids and essential oils against swine enteropathogenic bacteria
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.572947
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezgarciamanuel indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT arguellohector indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT puentehector indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT menciaaresoscar indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT gonzalezsandra indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT mirandaruben indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT rubiopedro indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria
AT carvajalana indepthinvitroevaluationoftheactivityandmechanismsofactionoforganicacidsandessentialoilsagainstswineenteropathogenicbacteria