Cargando…

KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver

BACKGROUND: Deriving individual tumor genomic characteristics from patient imaging analysis is desirable. We explore the predictive value of 2-[18F]FDG uptake with regard to the KRAS mutational status of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT images, surgical pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popovic, M., Talarico, O., van den Hoff, J., Kunin, H., Zhang, Z., Lafontaine, D., Dogan, S., Leung, J., Kaye, E., Czmielewski, C., Mayerhoefer, M. E., Zanzonico, P., Yaeger, R., Schöder, H., Humm, J. L., Solomon, S. B., Sofocleous, C. T., Kirov, A. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00707-0
_version_ 1783612922759479296
author Popovic, M.
Talarico, O.
van den Hoff, J.
Kunin, H.
Zhang, Z.
Lafontaine, D.
Dogan, S.
Leung, J.
Kaye, E.
Czmielewski, C.
Mayerhoefer, M. E.
Zanzonico, P.
Yaeger, R.
Schöder, H.
Humm, J. L.
Solomon, S. B.
Sofocleous, C. T.
Kirov, A. S.
author_facet Popovic, M.
Talarico, O.
van den Hoff, J.
Kunin, H.
Zhang, Z.
Lafontaine, D.
Dogan, S.
Leung, J.
Kaye, E.
Czmielewski, C.
Mayerhoefer, M. E.
Zanzonico, P.
Yaeger, R.
Schöder, H.
Humm, J. L.
Solomon, S. B.
Sofocleous, C. T.
Kirov, A. S.
author_sort Popovic, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deriving individual tumor genomic characteristics from patient imaging analysis is desirable. We explore the predictive value of 2-[18F]FDG uptake with regard to the KRAS mutational status of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT images, surgical pathology and molecular diagnostic reports of 37 patients who underwent PET/CT-guided biopsy of CLM were reviewed under an IRB-approved retrospective research protocol. Sixty CLM in 39 interventional PET scans of the 37 patients were segmented using two different auto-segmentation tools implemented in different commercially available software packages. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were corrected for: (1) partial volume effect (PVE) using cold wall-corrected contrast recovery coefficients derived from phantom spheres with variable diameter and (2) variability of arterial tracer supply and variability of uptake time after injection until start of PET scan derived from the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) approach. The correlations between the KRAS mutational status and the mean, peak and maximum SUV were investigated using Student’s t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, logistic regression and receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis. These correlation analyses were also performed for the ratios of the mean, peak and maximum tumor uptake to the mean blood activity concentration at the time of scan: SUR(MEAN), SUR(PEAK) and SUR(MAX), respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen patients harbored KRAS missense mutations (KRAS+), while another 3 harbored KRAS gene amplification. For 31 lesions, the mutational status was derived from the PET/CT-guided biopsy. The Student’s t test p values for separating KRAS mutant cases decreased after applying PVE correction to all uptake metrics of each lesion and when applying correction for uptake time variability to the SUR metrics. The observed correlations were strongest when both corrections were applied to SUR(MAX) and when the patients harboring gene amplification were grouped with the wild type: p ≤ 0.001; ROC area under the curve = 0.77 and 0.75 for the two different segmentations, respectively, with a mean specificity of 0.69 and sensitivity of 0.85. CONCLUSION: The correlations observed after applying the described corrections show potential for assigning probabilities for the KRAS missense mutation status in CLM using 2-[18F]FDG PET images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7683631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76836312020-11-27 KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver Popovic, M. Talarico, O. van den Hoff, J. Kunin, H. Zhang, Z. Lafontaine, D. Dogan, S. Leung, J. Kaye, E. Czmielewski, C. Mayerhoefer, M. E. Zanzonico, P. Yaeger, R. Schöder, H. Humm, J. L. Solomon, S. B. Sofocleous, C. T. Kirov, A. S. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Deriving individual tumor genomic characteristics from patient imaging analysis is desirable. We explore the predictive value of 2-[18F]FDG uptake with regard to the KRAS mutational status of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT images, surgical pathology and molecular diagnostic reports of 37 patients who underwent PET/CT-guided biopsy of CLM were reviewed under an IRB-approved retrospective research protocol. Sixty CLM in 39 interventional PET scans of the 37 patients were segmented using two different auto-segmentation tools implemented in different commercially available software packages. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were corrected for: (1) partial volume effect (PVE) using cold wall-corrected contrast recovery coefficients derived from phantom spheres with variable diameter and (2) variability of arterial tracer supply and variability of uptake time after injection until start of PET scan derived from the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) approach. The correlations between the KRAS mutational status and the mean, peak and maximum SUV were investigated using Student’s t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, logistic regression and receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis. These correlation analyses were also performed for the ratios of the mean, peak and maximum tumor uptake to the mean blood activity concentration at the time of scan: SUR(MEAN), SUR(PEAK) and SUR(MAX), respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen patients harbored KRAS missense mutations (KRAS+), while another 3 harbored KRAS gene amplification. For 31 lesions, the mutational status was derived from the PET/CT-guided biopsy. The Student’s t test p values for separating KRAS mutant cases decreased after applying PVE correction to all uptake metrics of each lesion and when applying correction for uptake time variability to the SUR metrics. The observed correlations were strongest when both corrections were applied to SUR(MAX) and when the patients harboring gene amplification were grouped with the wild type: p ≤ 0.001; ROC area under the curve = 0.77 and 0.75 for the two different segmentations, respectively, with a mean specificity of 0.69 and sensitivity of 0.85. CONCLUSION: The correlations observed after applying the described corrections show potential for assigning probabilities for the KRAS missense mutation status in CLM using 2-[18F]FDG PET images. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7683631/ /pubmed/33226505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00707-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Popovic, M.
Talarico, O.
van den Hoff, J.
Kunin, H.
Zhang, Z.
Lafontaine, D.
Dogan, S.
Leung, J.
Kaye, E.
Czmielewski, C.
Mayerhoefer, M. E.
Zanzonico, P.
Yaeger, R.
Schöder, H.
Humm, J. L.
Solomon, S. B.
Sofocleous, C. T.
Kirov, A. S.
KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title_full KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title_fullStr KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title_full_unstemmed KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title_short KRAS mutation effects on the 2-[18F]FDG PET uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
title_sort kras mutation effects on the 2-[18f]fdg pet uptake of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases in the liver
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00707-0
work_keys_str_mv AT popovicm krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT talaricoo krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT vandenhoffj krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT kuninh krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT zhangz krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT lafontained krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT dogans krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT leungj krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT kayee krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT czmielewskic krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT mayerhoeferme krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT zanzonicop krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT yaegerr krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT schoderh krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT hummjl krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT solomonsb krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT sofocleousct krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver
AT kirovas krasmutationeffectsonthe218ffdgpetuptakeofcolorectaladenocarcinomametastasesintheliver