Cargando…

The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis

PURPOSE: To identify the 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies published in radiology, medical imaging and nuclear medicine journals. METHODS: A PubMed search with pre-defined criteria was performed. The 100 top-cited articles meta-analyses were retrieved, using a custom Python...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaxley, Kaspar L., To, Minh-Son
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00936-w
_version_ 1783612924198125568
author Yaxley, Kaspar L.
To, Minh-Son
author_facet Yaxley, Kaspar L.
To, Minh-Son
author_sort Yaxley, Kaspar L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To identify the 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies published in radiology, medical imaging and nuclear medicine journals. METHODS: A PubMed search with pre-defined criteria was performed. The 100 top-cited articles meta-analyses were retrieved, using a custom Python script and the Scopus Application Programming Interface (Elsevier). Publication, citation and affiliation details were extracted from each meta-analysis. No formal statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The top meta-analysis was cited 394 times, the 100th meta-analysis 38 times. The USA was the top country represented in the papers (33 meta-analyses) followed by The Netherlands, China and Germany. The journal Radiology published 24 studies. The most common modality reported was positron emission tomography (PET) or PET computed tomography (36 instances), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (30 instances) and computed tomography (27 instances). Cardiac (19 meta-analyses), abdominal (18 meta-analyses), followed by neurological (12 meta-analyses) investigations were the most frequently encountered in the top 100 cited meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The 100 top-cited meta-analyses encompass a broad range of imaging modalities and body regions. This may comprise a useful resource for identifying influential evidence-based diagnostic accuracy information in radiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7683640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76836402020-11-27 The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis Yaxley, Kaspar L. To, Minh-Son Insights Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: To identify the 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies published in radiology, medical imaging and nuclear medicine journals. METHODS: A PubMed search with pre-defined criteria was performed. The 100 top-cited articles meta-analyses were retrieved, using a custom Python script and the Scopus Application Programming Interface (Elsevier). Publication, citation and affiliation details were extracted from each meta-analysis. No formal statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The top meta-analysis was cited 394 times, the 100th meta-analysis 38 times. The USA was the top country represented in the papers (33 meta-analyses) followed by The Netherlands, China and Germany. The journal Radiology published 24 studies. The most common modality reported was positron emission tomography (PET) or PET computed tomography (36 instances), followed by magnetic resonance imaging (30 instances) and computed tomography (27 instances). Cardiac (19 meta-analyses), abdominal (18 meta-analyses), followed by neurological (12 meta-analyses) investigations were the most frequently encountered in the top 100 cited meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The 100 top-cited meta-analyses encompass a broad range of imaging modalities and body regions. This may comprise a useful resource for identifying influential evidence-based diagnostic accuracy information in radiology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7683640/ /pubmed/33226503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00936-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaxley, Kaspar L.
To, Minh-Son
The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title_full The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title_short The 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
title_sort 100 top-cited meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy in radiology journals: a bibliometric analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33226503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00936-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yaxleykasparl the100topcitedmetaanalysesofdiagnosticaccuracyinradiologyjournalsabibliometricanalysis
AT tominhson the100topcitedmetaanalysesofdiagnosticaccuracyinradiologyjournalsabibliometricanalysis
AT yaxleykasparl 100topcitedmetaanalysesofdiagnosticaccuracyinradiologyjournalsabibliometricanalysis
AT tominhson 100topcitedmetaanalysesofdiagnosticaccuracyinradiologyjournalsabibliometricanalysis