Cargando…
Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data
A large variety of methods exist to estimate brain coupling in the frequency domain from electrophysiological data measured, e.g., by EEG and MEG. Those data are to reasonable approximation, though certainly not perfectly, Gaussian distributed. This work is based on the well-known fact that for Gaus...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.577574 |
_version_ | 1783612938745020416 |
---|---|
author | Nolte, Guido Galindo-Leon, Edgar Li, Zhenghan Liu, Xun Engel, Andreas K. |
author_facet | Nolte, Guido Galindo-Leon, Edgar Li, Zhenghan Liu, Xun Engel, Andreas K. |
author_sort | Nolte, Guido |
collection | PubMed |
description | A large variety of methods exist to estimate brain coupling in the frequency domain from electrophysiological data measured, e.g., by EEG and MEG. Those data are to reasonable approximation, though certainly not perfectly, Gaussian distributed. This work is based on the well-known fact that for Gaussian distributed data, the cross-spectrum completely determines all statistical properties. In particular, for an infinite number of data, all normalized coupling measures at a given frequency are a function of complex coherency. However, it is largely unknown what the functional relations are. We here present those functional relations for six different measures: the weighted phase lag index, the phase lag index, the absolute value and imaginary part of the phase locking value (PLV), power envelope correlation, and power envelope correlation with correction for artifacts of volume conduction. With the exception of PLV, the final results are simple closed form formulas. In an excursion we also discuss differences between short time Fourier transformation and Hilbert transformation for estimations in the frequency domain. We tested in simulations of linear and non-linear dynamical systems and for empirical resting state EEG on sensor level to what extent a model, namely the respective function of coherency, can explain the observed couplings. For empirical data we found that for measures of phase-phase coupling deviations from the model are in general minor, while power envelope correlations systematically deviate from the model for all frequencies. For power envelope correlation with correction for artifacts of volume conduction the model cannot explain the observed couplings at all. We also analyzed power envelope correlation as a function of time and frequency in an event related experiment using a stroop reaction task and found significant event related deviations mostly in the alpha range. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7683718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76837182020-11-24 Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data Nolte, Guido Galindo-Leon, Edgar Li, Zhenghan Liu, Xun Engel, Andreas K. Front Neurosci Neuroscience A large variety of methods exist to estimate brain coupling in the frequency domain from electrophysiological data measured, e.g., by EEG and MEG. Those data are to reasonable approximation, though certainly not perfectly, Gaussian distributed. This work is based on the well-known fact that for Gaussian distributed data, the cross-spectrum completely determines all statistical properties. In particular, for an infinite number of data, all normalized coupling measures at a given frequency are a function of complex coherency. However, it is largely unknown what the functional relations are. We here present those functional relations for six different measures: the weighted phase lag index, the phase lag index, the absolute value and imaginary part of the phase locking value (PLV), power envelope correlation, and power envelope correlation with correction for artifacts of volume conduction. With the exception of PLV, the final results are simple closed form formulas. In an excursion we also discuss differences between short time Fourier transformation and Hilbert transformation for estimations in the frequency domain. We tested in simulations of linear and non-linear dynamical systems and for empirical resting state EEG on sensor level to what extent a model, namely the respective function of coherency, can explain the observed couplings. For empirical data we found that for measures of phase-phase coupling deviations from the model are in general minor, while power envelope correlations systematically deviate from the model for all frequencies. For power envelope correlation with correction for artifacts of volume conduction the model cannot explain the observed couplings at all. We also analyzed power envelope correlation as a function of time and frequency in an event related experiment using a stroop reaction task and found significant event related deviations mostly in the alpha range. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7683718/ /pubmed/33240037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.577574 Text en Copyright © 2020 Nolte, Galindo-Leon, Li, Liu and Engel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Nolte, Guido Galindo-Leon, Edgar Li, Zhenghan Liu, Xun Engel, Andreas K. Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title | Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title_full | Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title_fullStr | Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title_short | Mathematical Relations Between Measures of Brain Connectivity Estimated From Electrophysiological Recordings for Gaussian Distributed Data |
title_sort | mathematical relations between measures of brain connectivity estimated from electrophysiological recordings for gaussian distributed data |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7683718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.577574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nolteguido mathematicalrelationsbetweenmeasuresofbrainconnectivityestimatedfromelectrophysiologicalrecordingsforgaussiandistributeddata AT galindoleonedgar mathematicalrelationsbetweenmeasuresofbrainconnectivityestimatedfromelectrophysiologicalrecordingsforgaussiandistributeddata AT lizhenghan mathematicalrelationsbetweenmeasuresofbrainconnectivityestimatedfromelectrophysiologicalrecordingsforgaussiandistributeddata AT liuxun mathematicalrelationsbetweenmeasuresofbrainconnectivityestimatedfromelectrophysiologicalrecordingsforgaussiandistributeddata AT engelandreask mathematicalrelationsbetweenmeasuresofbrainconnectivityestimatedfromelectrophysiologicalrecordingsforgaussiandistributeddata |