Cargando…
Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867 |
_version_ | 1783613016226398208 |
---|---|
author | Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Zou, Yi Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Liu, Shao-Hua Hong, Fang-Xiao Xue, Fu-Shan |
author_facet | Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Zou, Yi Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Liu, Shao-Hua Hong, Fang-Xiao Xue, Fu-Shan |
author_sort | Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channel. The available evidence indicates that with a low oxygen flow, compared with nasal cannula, the WNJT does not decrease the occurrence of hypoxemia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with propofol sedation. To date, there has been no study assessing the performance of WNJT for supplemental oxygen during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is used. AIM: To determine whether the WNJT performs better than the nasal prongs for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is provided in patients with a normal body mass index. METHODS: This study was performed in 291 patients undergoing elective gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. Patients were randomized into one of two groups to receive either the WNJT (WNJT group, n = 147) or the nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 144) for supplemental oxygen at a 5-L/min flow during gastroscopy. The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy was recorded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia or severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy. RESULTS: The total incidence of hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy was significantly decreased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group (P = 0.000). The lowest median SpO(2) during gastroscopy was significantly higher (98%; interquartile range, 97-99) in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group (96%; interquartile range, 93-98). Epistaxis by device insertion in the WNJT group occurred in 7 patients but stopped naturally without any treatment. The two groups were comparable in terms of the satisfaction of physicians, anesthetists and patients. CONCLUSION: With a moderate oxygen flow, the WNJT is more effective for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation compared with nasal prongs, but causing slight epistaxis in a few patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7684457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76844572020-12-01 Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Zou, Yi Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Liu, Shao-Hua Hong, Fang-Xiao Xue, Fu-Shan World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channel. The available evidence indicates that with a low oxygen flow, compared with nasal cannula, the WNJT does not decrease the occurrence of hypoxemia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with propofol sedation. To date, there has been no study assessing the performance of WNJT for supplemental oxygen during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is used. AIM: To determine whether the WNJT performs better than the nasal prongs for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is provided in patients with a normal body mass index. METHODS: This study was performed in 291 patients undergoing elective gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. Patients were randomized into one of two groups to receive either the WNJT (WNJT group, n = 147) or the nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 144) for supplemental oxygen at a 5-L/min flow during gastroscopy. The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy was recorded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia or severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy. RESULTS: The total incidence of hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy was significantly decreased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group (P = 0.000). The lowest median SpO(2) during gastroscopy was significantly higher (98%; interquartile range, 97-99) in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group (96%; interquartile range, 93-98). Epistaxis by device insertion in the WNJT group occurred in 7 patients but stopped naturally without any treatment. The two groups were comparable in terms of the satisfaction of physicians, anesthetists and patients. CONCLUSION: With a moderate oxygen flow, the WNJT is more effective for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation compared with nasal prongs, but causing slight epistaxis in a few patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-21 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7684457/ /pubmed/33268967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Zou, Yi Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Liu, Shao-Hua Hong, Fang-Xiao Xue, Fu-Shan Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title | Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title_full | Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title_short | Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
title_sort | comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shaoliujiazi comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT zouyi comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT liufukun comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT wanlei comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT liushaohua comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT hongfangxiao comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex AT xuefushan comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex |