Cargando…

Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi, Zou, Yi, Liu, Fu-Kun, Wan, Lei, Liu, Shao-Hua, Hong, Fang-Xiao, Xue, Fu-Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867
_version_ 1783613016226398208
author Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Zou, Yi
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Liu, Shao-Hua
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Xue, Fu-Shan
author_facet Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Zou, Yi
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Liu, Shao-Hua
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Xue, Fu-Shan
author_sort Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channel. The available evidence indicates that with a low oxygen flow, compared with nasal cannula, the WNJT does not decrease the occurrence of hypoxemia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with propofol sedation. To date, there has been no study assessing the performance of WNJT for supplemental oxygen during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is used. AIM: To determine whether the WNJT performs better than the nasal prongs for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is provided in patients with a normal body mass index. METHODS: This study was performed in 291 patients undergoing elective gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. Patients were randomized into one of two groups to receive either the WNJT (WNJT group, n = 147) or the nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 144) for supplemental oxygen at a 5-L/min flow during gastroscopy. The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy was recorded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia or severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy. RESULTS: The total incidence of hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy was significantly decreased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group (P = 0.000). The lowest median SpO(2) during gastroscopy was significantly higher (98%; interquartile range, 97-99) in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group (96%; interquartile range, 93-98). Epistaxis by device insertion in the WNJT group occurred in 7 patients but stopped naturally without any treatment. The two groups were comparable in terms of the satisfaction of physicians, anesthetists and patients. CONCLUSION: With a moderate oxygen flow, the WNJT is more effective for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation compared with nasal prongs, but causing slight epistaxis in a few patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76844572020-12-01 Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Zou, Yi Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Liu, Shao-Hua Hong, Fang-Xiao Xue, Fu-Shan World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia due to respiratory depression and airway obstruction during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation is a common concern. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channel. The available evidence indicates that with a low oxygen flow, compared with nasal cannula, the WNJT does not decrease the occurrence of hypoxemia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with propofol sedation. To date, there has been no study assessing the performance of WNJT for supplemental oxygen during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is used. AIM: To determine whether the WNJT performs better than the nasal prongs for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation when a moderate oxygen flow is provided in patients with a normal body mass index. METHODS: This study was performed in 291 patients undergoing elective gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. Patients were randomized into one of two groups to receive either the WNJT (WNJT group, n = 147) or the nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 144) for supplemental oxygen at a 5-L/min flow during gastroscopy. The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy was recorded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia or severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy. RESULTS: The total incidence of hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy was significantly decreased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group (P = 0.000). The lowest median SpO(2) during gastroscopy was significantly higher (98%; interquartile range, 97-99) in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group (96%; interquartile range, 93-98). Epistaxis by device insertion in the WNJT group occurred in 7 patients but stopped naturally without any treatment. The two groups were comparable in terms of the satisfaction of physicians, anesthetists and patients. CONCLUSION: With a moderate oxygen flow, the WNJT is more effective for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation compared with nasal prongs, but causing slight epistaxis in a few patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-21 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7684457/ /pubmed/33268967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Zou, Yi
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Liu, Shao-Hua
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Xue, Fu-Shan
Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title_full Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title_fullStr Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title_short Comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
title_sort comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients with a normal body mass index
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6867
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoliujiazi comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT zouyi comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT liufukun comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT wanlei comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT liushaohua comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT hongfangxiao comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex
AT xuefushan comparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinpatientswithanormalbodymassindex