Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula can’t be considered non-inferior to noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who develop respiratory failure after extubation
Autores principales: | Curtis, Robert V., Kabchi, Badih A., Alqalyoobi, Shehabaldin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03363-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Respiratory support after extubation: noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula, as appropriate
por: Mauri, Tommaso, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula compared to noninvasive ventilation in patients with post-extubation respiratory failure
por: Yoo, Jung-Wan, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Can a high-flow nasal cannula substitute for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in post-extubation respiratory failure?
por: Kim, Je Hyeong
Publicado: (2016) -
High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation after extubation in hypercapnic patients with COPD: A retrospective analysis
por: Liu, Yuanshui, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Outpatient Utilization of the RAM Cannula for Nasal Noninvasive Ventilation in Children
por: Truitt, Brittany A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)