Cargando…

Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance conditions, sensory manipulations). However, it remains unclear whether the application of different levels of task difficulty during balance training (BT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schedler, Simon, Tenelsen, Florian, Wich, Laura, Muehlbauer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00218-4
_version_ 1783613059677290496
author Schedler, Simon
Tenelsen, Florian
Wich, Laura
Muehlbauer, Thomas
author_facet Schedler, Simon
Tenelsen, Florian
Wich, Laura
Muehlbauer, Thomas
author_sort Schedler, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance conditions, sensory manipulations). However, it remains unclear whether the application of different levels of task difficulty during balance training (BT) leads to altered adaptations in balance performance. Thus, we examined the effects of BT conducted under a high versus a low level of task difficulty on balance performance. METHODS: Forty male adolescents were randomly assigned to a BT program using a low (BT-low: n = 20; age: 12.4 ± 2.0 yrs) or a high (BT-high: n = 20; age: 12.5 ± 2.5 yrs) level of balance task difficulty. Both groups trained for 7 weeks (2 sessions/week, 30–35 min each). Pre- and post-training assessments included measures of static (one-legged stance [OLS] time), dynamic (10-m gait velocity), and proactive (Y-Balance Test [YBT] reach distance, Functional Reach Test [FRT]; Timed-Up-and-Go Test [TUG]) balance. RESULTS: Significant main effects of Test (i.e., pre- to post-test improvements) were observed for all but one balance measure (i.e., 10-m gait velocity). Additionally, a Test x Group interaction was detected for the FRT in favor of the BT-high group (Δ + 8%, p < 0.001, d = 0.35). Further, tendencies toward significant Test x Group interactions were found for the YBT anterior reach (in favor of BT-high: Δ + 9%, p < 0.001, d = 0.60) and for the OLS with eyes opened and on firm surface (in favor of BT-low: Δ + 31%, p = 0.003, d = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Following 7 weeks of BT, enhancements in measures of static, dynamic, and proactive balance were observed in the BT-high and BT-low groups. However, BT-high appears to be more effective for increasing measures of proactive balance, whereas BT-low seems to be more effective for improving proxies of static balance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83638708 (Retrospectively registered 19th June, 2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76847452020-11-24 Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty Schedler, Simon Tenelsen, Florian Wich, Laura Muehlbauer, Thomas BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research Article BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance conditions, sensory manipulations). However, it remains unclear whether the application of different levels of task difficulty during balance training (BT) leads to altered adaptations in balance performance. Thus, we examined the effects of BT conducted under a high versus a low level of task difficulty on balance performance. METHODS: Forty male adolescents were randomly assigned to a BT program using a low (BT-low: n = 20; age: 12.4 ± 2.0 yrs) or a high (BT-high: n = 20; age: 12.5 ± 2.5 yrs) level of balance task difficulty. Both groups trained for 7 weeks (2 sessions/week, 30–35 min each). Pre- and post-training assessments included measures of static (one-legged stance [OLS] time), dynamic (10-m gait velocity), and proactive (Y-Balance Test [YBT] reach distance, Functional Reach Test [FRT]; Timed-Up-and-Go Test [TUG]) balance. RESULTS: Significant main effects of Test (i.e., pre- to post-test improvements) were observed for all but one balance measure (i.e., 10-m gait velocity). Additionally, a Test x Group interaction was detected for the FRT in favor of the BT-high group (Δ + 8%, p < 0.001, d = 0.35). Further, tendencies toward significant Test x Group interactions were found for the YBT anterior reach (in favor of BT-high: Δ + 9%, p < 0.001, d = 0.60) and for the OLS with eyes opened and on firm surface (in favor of BT-low: Δ + 31%, p = 0.003, d = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Following 7 weeks of BT, enhancements in measures of static, dynamic, and proactive balance were observed in the BT-high and BT-low groups. However, BT-high appears to be more effective for increasing measures of proactive balance, whereas BT-low seems to be more effective for improving proxies of static balance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83638708 (Retrospectively registered 19th June, 2020). BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7684745/ /pubmed/33292455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00218-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schedler, Simon
Tenelsen, Florian
Wich, Laura
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title_full Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title_fullStr Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title_full_unstemmed Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title_short Effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
title_sort effects of balance training on balance performance in youth: role of training difficulty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-020-00218-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schedlersimon effectsofbalancetrainingonbalanceperformanceinyouthroleoftrainingdifficulty
AT tenelsenflorian effectsofbalancetrainingonbalanceperformanceinyouthroleoftrainingdifficulty
AT wichlaura effectsofbalancetrainingonbalanceperformanceinyouthroleoftrainingdifficulty
AT muehlbauerthomas effectsofbalancetrainingonbalanceperformanceinyouthroleoftrainingdifficulty