Cargando…

Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients

OBJECTIVES: A core outcome set (COS) describes a minimum set of outcomes to be reported by all clinical trials of one healthcare condition. Delphi surveys are frequently used to achieve consensus on core outcomes. International input is important to achieve global COS uptake. We aimed to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Alice, Davies, Anna, Young, Amber E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040223
_version_ 1783613075334627328
author Lee, Alice
Davies, Anna
Young, Amber E
author_facet Lee, Alice
Davies, Anna
Young, Amber E
author_sort Lee, Alice
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A core outcome set (COS) describes a minimum set of outcomes to be reported by all clinical trials of one healthcare condition. Delphi surveys are frequently used to achieve consensus on core outcomes. International input is important to achieve global COS uptake. We aimed to investigate participant representation in international Delphi surveys, with reference to the inclusion of patients and participants from low and middle income countries as stakeholders (LMICs). DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, COMET database and hand-searching. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Protocols and studies describing Delphi surveys used to develop an international COS for trial reporting, published between 1 January 2017 and 6 June 2019. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Delphi participants were grouped as patients or healthcare professionals (HCPs). Participants were considered international if their country of origin was different to that of the first or senior author. Data extraction included participant numbers, country of origin, country income group and whether Delphi surveys were translated. We analysed the impact these factors had on outcome prioritisation. RESULTS: Of 90 included studies, 69% (n=62) were completed and 31% (n=28) were protocols. Studies recruited more HCPs than patients (median 60 (IQR 30–113) vs 30 (IQR 14–66) participants, respectively). A higher percentage of HCPs was international compared with patients (57% (IQR 37–78) vs 20% (IQR 0–68)). Only 31% (n=28) studies recruited participants from LMICs. Regarding recruitment from LMICs, patients were under-represented (16% studies; n=8) compared with HCPs (22%; n=28). Few (7%; n=6) studies translated Delphi surveys. Only 3% studies (n=3) analysed Delphi responses by geographical location; all found differences in outcome prioritisation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a disproportionately lower inclusion of international patients, compared with HCPs, in COS-development Delphi surveys, particularly within LMICs. Future international Delphi surveys should consider exploring for geographical and income-based differences in outcome prioritisation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138519.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76848262020-11-30 Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients Lee, Alice Davies, Anna Young, Amber E BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: A core outcome set (COS) describes a minimum set of outcomes to be reported by all clinical trials of one healthcare condition. Delphi surveys are frequently used to achieve consensus on core outcomes. International input is important to achieve global COS uptake. We aimed to investigate participant representation in international Delphi surveys, with reference to the inclusion of patients and participants from low and middle income countries as stakeholders (LMICs). DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, COMET database and hand-searching. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Protocols and studies describing Delphi surveys used to develop an international COS for trial reporting, published between 1 January 2017 and 6 June 2019. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Delphi participants were grouped as patients or healthcare professionals (HCPs). Participants were considered international if their country of origin was different to that of the first or senior author. Data extraction included participant numbers, country of origin, country income group and whether Delphi surveys were translated. We analysed the impact these factors had on outcome prioritisation. RESULTS: Of 90 included studies, 69% (n=62) were completed and 31% (n=28) were protocols. Studies recruited more HCPs than patients (median 60 (IQR 30–113) vs 30 (IQR 14–66) participants, respectively). A higher percentage of HCPs was international compared with patients (57% (IQR 37–78) vs 20% (IQR 0–68)). Only 31% (n=28) studies recruited participants from LMICs. Regarding recruitment from LMICs, patients were under-represented (16% studies; n=8) compared with HCPs (22%; n=28). Few (7%; n=6) studies translated Delphi surveys. Only 3% studies (n=3) analysed Delphi responses by geographical location; all found differences in outcome prioritisation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a disproportionately lower inclusion of international patients, compared with HCPs, in COS-development Delphi surveys, particularly within LMICs. Future international Delphi surveys should consider exploring for geographical and income-based differences in outcome prioritisation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019138519. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7684826/ /pubmed/33234639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040223 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Lee, Alice
Davies, Anna
Young, Amber E
Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title_full Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title_fullStr Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title_short Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
title_sort systematic review of international delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040223
work_keys_str_mv AT leealice systematicreviewofinternationaldelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentrepresentationofinternationalpatients
AT daviesanna systematicreviewofinternationaldelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentrepresentationofinternationalpatients
AT youngambere systematicreviewofinternationaldelphisurveysforcoreoutcomesetdevelopmentrepresentationofinternationalpatients