Cargando…

Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Haglund’s deformity is an abnormal bony enlargement on the back of the heel. It can cause the impact of the posterior calcaneal bursa and Achilles tendon insertion, and finally result in pain. This syndrome is called Haglund syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yan, Duan, Deyu, He, Lei, Ouyang, Liu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208723
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.927501
_version_ 1783613078627155968
author Xu, Yan
Duan, Deyu
He, Lei
Ouyang, Liu
author_facet Xu, Yan
Duan, Deyu
He, Lei
Ouyang, Liu
author_sort Xu, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Haglund’s deformity is an abnormal bony enlargement on the back of the heel. It can cause the impact of the posterior calcaneal bursa and Achilles tendon insertion, and finally result in pain. This syndrome is called Haglund syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of the suture anchor and allogeneic tendon suture in the treatment of Haglund syndrome. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively studied 20 patients with Haglund syndrome treated from January 2015 to December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into Group 1 (the suture anchor group) and Group 2 (the allogeneic tendon group), with 10 patients in each group and an average follow-up of 32 months after surgery. The AOFAS, VAS, and Arner-Lindholm scales were used to summarize the patient follow-up results and complications. RESULTS: In the 2 groups of patients, the postoperative AOFAS, VAS scores, and the Arner-Lindholm scale showed good results. However, the postoperative AOFAS score and VAS of the suture anchor group were better than those of the allogeneic tendon group, with shorter operation times. No Achilles tendon rupture or wound infection occurred during the entire postoperative period in either group. These results show the superiority of suture anchors. CONCLUSIONS: The higher AOFAS and VAS score and shorter operation time in the suture anchor group suggest it is the better alternative for treatment of Haglund syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76848472020-12-03 Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome Xu, Yan Duan, Deyu He, Lei Ouyang, Liu Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Haglund’s deformity is an abnormal bony enlargement on the back of the heel. It can cause the impact of the posterior calcaneal bursa and Achilles tendon insertion, and finally result in pain. This syndrome is called Haglund syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of the suture anchor and allogeneic tendon suture in the treatment of Haglund syndrome. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively studied 20 patients with Haglund syndrome treated from January 2015 to December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into Group 1 (the suture anchor group) and Group 2 (the allogeneic tendon group), with 10 patients in each group and an average follow-up of 32 months after surgery. The AOFAS, VAS, and Arner-Lindholm scales were used to summarize the patient follow-up results and complications. RESULTS: In the 2 groups of patients, the postoperative AOFAS, VAS scores, and the Arner-Lindholm scale showed good results. However, the postoperative AOFAS score and VAS of the suture anchor group were better than those of the allogeneic tendon group, with shorter operation times. No Achilles tendon rupture or wound infection occurred during the entire postoperative period in either group. These results show the superiority of suture anchors. CONCLUSIONS: The higher AOFAS and VAS score and shorter operation time in the suture anchor group suggest it is the better alternative for treatment of Haglund syndrome. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7684847/ /pubmed/33208723 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.927501 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Xu, Yan
Duan, Deyu
He, Lei
Ouyang, Liu
Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title_full Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title_fullStr Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title_short Suture Anchor Versus Allogenic Tendon Suture in Treatment of Haglund Syndrome
title_sort suture anchor versus allogenic tendon suture in treatment of haglund syndrome
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208723
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.927501
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyan sutureanchorversusallogenictendonsutureintreatmentofhaglundsyndrome
AT duandeyu sutureanchorversusallogenictendonsutureintreatmentofhaglundsyndrome
AT helei sutureanchorversusallogenictendonsutureintreatmentofhaglundsyndrome
AT ouyangliu sutureanchorversusallogenictendonsutureintreatmentofhaglundsyndrome