Cargando…

Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey

BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Hoovels, Lieve, Broeders, Sylvia, Chan, Edward K. L., Andrade, Luis, de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson, Damoiseaux, Jan, Viander, Markku, Herold, Manfred, Coucke, Wim, Heijnen, Ingmar, Bogdanos, Dimitrios, Calvo-Alén, Jaime, Eriksson, Catharina, Kozmar, Ana, Kuhi, Liisa, Bonroy, Carolien, Lauwerys, Bernard, Schouwers, Sofie, Lutteri, Laurence, Vercammen, Martine, Mayer, Miroslav, Patel, Dina, Egner, William, Puolakka, Kari, Tesija-Kuna, Andrea, Shoenfeld, Yehuda, de Sousa, Maria José Rego, Hoyos, Marcos Lopez, Radice, Antonella, Bossuyt, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
_version_ 1783613087799050240
author Van Hoovels, Lieve
Broeders, Sylvia
Chan, Edward K. L.
Andrade, Luis
de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson
Damoiseaux, Jan
Viander, Markku
Herold, Manfred
Coucke, Wim
Heijnen, Ingmar
Bogdanos, Dimitrios
Calvo-Alén, Jaime
Eriksson, Catharina
Kozmar, Ana
Kuhi, Liisa
Bonroy, Carolien
Lauwerys, Bernard
Schouwers, Sofie
Lutteri, Laurence
Vercammen, Martine
Mayer, Miroslav
Patel, Dina
Egner, William
Puolakka, Kari
Tesija-Kuna, Andrea
Shoenfeld, Yehuda
de Sousa, Maria José Rego
Hoyos, Marcos Lopez
Radice, Antonella
Bossuyt, Xavier
author_facet Van Hoovels, Lieve
Broeders, Sylvia
Chan, Edward K. L.
Andrade, Luis
de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson
Damoiseaux, Jan
Viander, Markku
Herold, Manfred
Coucke, Wim
Heijnen, Ingmar
Bogdanos, Dimitrios
Calvo-Alén, Jaime
Eriksson, Catharina
Kozmar, Ana
Kuhi, Liisa
Bonroy, Carolien
Lauwerys, Bernard
Schouwers, Sofie
Lutteri, Laurence
Vercammen, Martine
Mayer, Miroslav
Patel, Dina
Egner, William
Puolakka, Kari
Tesija-Kuna, Andrea
Shoenfeld, Yehuda
de Sousa, Maria José Rego
Hoyos, Marcos Lopez
Radice, Antonella
Bossuyt, Xavier
author_sort Van Hoovels, Lieve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. METHODS: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. RESULTS: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76848892020-11-25 Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey Van Hoovels, Lieve Broeders, Sylvia Chan, Edward K. L. Andrade, Luis de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson Damoiseaux, Jan Viander, Markku Herold, Manfred Coucke, Wim Heijnen, Ingmar Bogdanos, Dimitrios Calvo-Alén, Jaime Eriksson, Catharina Kozmar, Ana Kuhi, Liisa Bonroy, Carolien Lauwerys, Bernard Schouwers, Sofie Lutteri, Laurence Vercammen, Martine Mayer, Miroslav Patel, Dina Egner, William Puolakka, Kari Tesija-Kuna, Andrea Shoenfeld, Yehuda de Sousa, Maria José Rego Hoyos, Marcos Lopez Radice, Antonella Bossuyt, Xavier Auto Immun Highlights Original Research BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. METHODS: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. RESULTS: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7684889/ /pubmed/33228811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Van Hoovels, Lieve
Broeders, Sylvia
Chan, Edward K. L.
Andrade, Luis
de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson
Damoiseaux, Jan
Viander, Markku
Herold, Manfred
Coucke, Wim
Heijnen, Ingmar
Bogdanos, Dimitrios
Calvo-Alén, Jaime
Eriksson, Catharina
Kozmar, Ana
Kuhi, Liisa
Bonroy, Carolien
Lauwerys, Bernard
Schouwers, Sofie
Lutteri, Laurence
Vercammen, Martine
Mayer, Miroslav
Patel, Dina
Egner, William
Puolakka, Kari
Tesija-Kuna, Andrea
Shoenfeld, Yehuda
de Sousa, Maria José Rego
Hoyos, Marcos Lopez
Radice, Antonella
Bossuyt, Xavier
Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title_full Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title_fullStr Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title_full_unstemmed Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title_short Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
title_sort current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ana iif) patterns: results of an international survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhoovelslieve currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT broederssylvia currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT chanedwardkl currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT andradeluis currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT demelocruvinelwilson currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT damoiseauxjan currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT viandermarkku currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT heroldmanfred currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT couckewim currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT heijneningmar currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT bogdanosdimitrios currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT calvoalenjaime currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT erikssoncatharina currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT kozmarana currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT kuhiliisa currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT bonroycarolien currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT lauwerysbernard currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT schouwerssofie currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT lutterilaurence currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT vercammenmartine currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT mayermiroslav currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT pateldina currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT egnerwilliam currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT puolakkakari currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT tesijakunaandrea currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT shoenfeldyehuda currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT desousamariajoserego currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT hoyosmarcoslopez currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT radiceantonella currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey
AT bossuytxavier currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey