Cargando…
Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey
BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9 |
_version_ | 1783613087799050240 |
---|---|
author | Van Hoovels, Lieve Broeders, Sylvia Chan, Edward K. L. Andrade, Luis de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson Damoiseaux, Jan Viander, Markku Herold, Manfred Coucke, Wim Heijnen, Ingmar Bogdanos, Dimitrios Calvo-Alén, Jaime Eriksson, Catharina Kozmar, Ana Kuhi, Liisa Bonroy, Carolien Lauwerys, Bernard Schouwers, Sofie Lutteri, Laurence Vercammen, Martine Mayer, Miroslav Patel, Dina Egner, William Puolakka, Kari Tesija-Kuna, Andrea Shoenfeld, Yehuda de Sousa, Maria José Rego Hoyos, Marcos Lopez Radice, Antonella Bossuyt, Xavier |
author_facet | Van Hoovels, Lieve Broeders, Sylvia Chan, Edward K. L. Andrade, Luis de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson Damoiseaux, Jan Viander, Markku Herold, Manfred Coucke, Wim Heijnen, Ingmar Bogdanos, Dimitrios Calvo-Alén, Jaime Eriksson, Catharina Kozmar, Ana Kuhi, Liisa Bonroy, Carolien Lauwerys, Bernard Schouwers, Sofie Lutteri, Laurence Vercammen, Martine Mayer, Miroslav Patel, Dina Egner, William Puolakka, Kari Tesija-Kuna, Andrea Shoenfeld, Yehuda de Sousa, Maria José Rego Hoyos, Marcos Lopez Radice, Antonella Bossuyt, Xavier |
author_sort | Van Hoovels, Lieve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. METHODS: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. RESULTS: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7684889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76848892020-11-25 Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey Van Hoovels, Lieve Broeders, Sylvia Chan, Edward K. L. Andrade, Luis de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson Damoiseaux, Jan Viander, Markku Herold, Manfred Coucke, Wim Heijnen, Ingmar Bogdanos, Dimitrios Calvo-Alén, Jaime Eriksson, Catharina Kozmar, Ana Kuhi, Liisa Bonroy, Carolien Lauwerys, Bernard Schouwers, Sofie Lutteri, Laurence Vercammen, Martine Mayer, Miroslav Patel, Dina Egner, William Puolakka, Kari Tesija-Kuna, Andrea Shoenfeld, Yehuda de Sousa, Maria José Rego Hoyos, Marcos Lopez Radice, Antonella Bossuyt, Xavier Auto Immun Highlights Original Research BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. METHODS: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. RESULTS: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7684889/ /pubmed/33228811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Van Hoovels, Lieve Broeders, Sylvia Chan, Edward K. L. Andrade, Luis de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson Damoiseaux, Jan Viander, Markku Herold, Manfred Coucke, Wim Heijnen, Ingmar Bogdanos, Dimitrios Calvo-Alén, Jaime Eriksson, Catharina Kozmar, Ana Kuhi, Liisa Bonroy, Carolien Lauwerys, Bernard Schouwers, Sofie Lutteri, Laurence Vercammen, Martine Mayer, Miroslav Patel, Dina Egner, William Puolakka, Kari Tesija-Kuna, Andrea Shoenfeld, Yehuda de Sousa, Maria José Rego Hoyos, Marcos Lopez Radice, Antonella Bossuyt, Xavier Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title | Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title_full | Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title_fullStr | Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title_short | Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey |
title_sort | current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ana iif) patterns: results of an international survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhoovelslieve currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT broederssylvia currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT chanedwardkl currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT andradeluis currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT demelocruvinelwilson currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT damoiseauxjan currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT viandermarkku currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT heroldmanfred currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT couckewim currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT heijneningmar currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT bogdanosdimitrios currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT calvoalenjaime currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT erikssoncatharina currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT kozmarana currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT kuhiliisa currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT bonroycarolien currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT lauwerysbernard currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT schouwerssofie currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT lutterilaurence currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT vercammenmartine currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT mayermiroslav currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT pateldina currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT egnerwilliam currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT puolakkakari currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT tesijakunaandrea currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT shoenfeldyehuda currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT desousamariajoserego currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT hoyosmarcoslopez currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT radiceantonella currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey AT bossuytxavier currentlaboratoryandclinicalpracticesinreportingandinterpretingantinuclearantibodyindirectimmunofluorescenceanaiifpatternsresultsofaninternationalsurvey |