Cargando…

How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Ageing in place has recently gained visibility in healthcare policies and services. Technology has the potential to facilitate independence at home. The objective of this systematic review is to identify technologies that have been rigorously evaluated for supporting the ageing in place...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ollevier, Aline, Aguiar, Gabriel, Palomino, Marco, Simpelaere, Ingeborg Sylvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4
_version_ 1783613100507791360
author Ollevier, Aline
Aguiar, Gabriel
Palomino, Marco
Simpelaere, Ingeborg Sylvia
author_facet Ollevier, Aline
Aguiar, Gabriel
Palomino, Marco
Simpelaere, Ingeborg Sylvia
author_sort Ollevier, Aline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ageing in place has recently gained visibility in healthcare policies and services. Technology has the potential to facilitate independence at home. The objective of this systematic review is to identify technologies that have been rigorously evaluated for supporting the ageing in place of healthy older adults. As well we explored the methods in engagement with technology in healthy older adults. METHODS: Databases Pubmed, Scopus, PsycInfo and Cinahl were consulted for clinical controlled trials or randomised controlled trials between 2014 and 2019. Studies were included if they contained a technological intervention and focussed on supporting healthy older adults’ independent living. PRISMA guidelines and the risk of bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration were applied. RESULTS: The search identified 3662 articles of which only 7 made the final analysis. Through narrative analysis, technologies were categorised into three groups: accessible communication, emergency assistance and physical and mental well-being. Patient-centredness was extensively addressed by exploring how the participants engaged in the development and evaluation of the technology and how they were trained and monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Literature concerning technology to support ageing, based on controlled trials and research performed in authentic home situations, is scarce. Thus, there is a need to investigate the subject in depth. The use of a neurofeedback headband, an accessible computer system, a wristband with pedometer, a biofeedback device and an online video platform can bring added value to ageing in place for healthy older adults. A patient-centred approach for developing, implementing and evaluating technology benefits ageing in place. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7684947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76849472020-11-25 How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review Ollevier, Aline Aguiar, Gabriel Palomino, Marco Simpelaere, Ingeborg Sylvia Public Health Rev Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Ageing in place has recently gained visibility in healthcare policies and services. Technology has the potential to facilitate independence at home. The objective of this systematic review is to identify technologies that have been rigorously evaluated for supporting the ageing in place of healthy older adults. As well we explored the methods in engagement with technology in healthy older adults. METHODS: Databases Pubmed, Scopus, PsycInfo and Cinahl were consulted for clinical controlled trials or randomised controlled trials between 2014 and 2019. Studies were included if they contained a technological intervention and focussed on supporting healthy older adults’ independent living. PRISMA guidelines and the risk of bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration were applied. RESULTS: The search identified 3662 articles of which only 7 made the final analysis. Through narrative analysis, technologies were categorised into three groups: accessible communication, emergency assistance and physical and mental well-being. Patient-centredness was extensively addressed by exploring how the participants engaged in the development and evaluation of the technology and how they were trained and monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Literature concerning technology to support ageing, based on controlled trials and research performed in authentic home situations, is scarce. Thus, there is a need to investigate the subject in depth. The use of a neurofeedback headband, an accessible computer system, a wristband with pedometer, a biofeedback device and an online video platform can bring added value to ageing in place for healthy older adults. A patient-centred approach for developing, implementing and evaluating technology benefits ageing in place. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7684947/ /pubmed/33292707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ollevier, Aline
Aguiar, Gabriel
Palomino, Marco
Simpelaere, Ingeborg Sylvia
How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title_full How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title_fullStr How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title_short How can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? A systematic review
title_sort how can technology support ageing in place in healthy older adults? a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7684947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00143-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ollevieraline howcantechnologysupportageinginplaceinhealthyolderadultsasystematicreview
AT aguiargabriel howcantechnologysupportageinginplaceinhealthyolderadultsasystematicreview
AT palominomarco howcantechnologysupportageinginplaceinhealthyolderadultsasystematicreview
AT simpelaereingeborgsylvia howcantechnologysupportageinginplaceinhealthyolderadultsasystematicreview