Cargando…
A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain
INTRODUCTION: Combination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate‐to‐severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13616 |
_version_ | 1783613125868650496 |
---|---|
author | Landeira, Margarita Mora Blázquez, Ana M. Martins de Almeida, Rodrigo Covernton, Patrick J. O. Medina‐Polo, José Montero, Antonio Alcántara |
author_facet | Landeira, Margarita Mora Blázquez, Ana M. Martins de Almeida, Rodrigo Covernton, Patrick J. O. Medina‐Polo, José Montero, Antonio Alcántara |
author_sort | Landeira, Margarita |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Combination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate‐to‐severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence with an AB plus AM fixed‐dose combination (FDC) vs an AB plus AM free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA Cegedim Electronic Medical Records database. Men prescribed AB plus AM combination therapy were included in an FDC or free‐dose combination cohort based on their index treatment. Treatment persistence was the time from index date to first discontinuation of ≥1 of the two index drugs over 12 months. Adherence was measured using the fixed medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Of 3114 patients identified, 999 were included (FDC, n = 790; free‐dose combination, n = 209). Median (95% CI) persistence was longer in the FDC (125 [109‐151] days) than in the free‐dose combination (31 [31‐36] days) cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4‐3.4; P < .0001). The 12‐month persistence rates were 31.1% (FDC cohort) and 8.9% (free‐dose cohort). The mean (SD) fixed MPR was higher in the FDC cohort (48.8 [37.2]) compared with the free‐dose cohort (23.1 [28.4]); more patients in the FDC cohort (34.2%) than in the free‐dose cohort (10.0%) were adherent (MPR ≥ 80%). The probability of treatment persistence and adherence increased with age (>80 vs <65 years, persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 12.5), polypharmacy (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6‐0.9]; MPR difference, 10.7) and previous use of AB (persistence HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7‐1.0]; MPR difference, 5.7) or AB/AM combinations (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an AB/AM FDC is associated with better persistence and adherence vs a free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7685104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76851042020-12-03 A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain Landeira, Margarita Mora Blázquez, Ana M. Martins de Almeida, Rodrigo Covernton, Patrick J. O. Medina‐Polo, José Montero, Antonio Alcántara Int J Clin Pract Original Papers INTRODUCTION: Combination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate‐to‐severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence with an AB plus AM fixed‐dose combination (FDC) vs an AB plus AM free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA Cegedim Electronic Medical Records database. Men prescribed AB plus AM combination therapy were included in an FDC or free‐dose combination cohort based on their index treatment. Treatment persistence was the time from index date to first discontinuation of ≥1 of the two index drugs over 12 months. Adherence was measured using the fixed medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Of 3114 patients identified, 999 were included (FDC, n = 790; free‐dose combination, n = 209). Median (95% CI) persistence was longer in the FDC (125 [109‐151] days) than in the free‐dose combination (31 [31‐36] days) cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4‐3.4; P < .0001). The 12‐month persistence rates were 31.1% (FDC cohort) and 8.9% (free‐dose cohort). The mean (SD) fixed MPR was higher in the FDC cohort (48.8 [37.2]) compared with the free‐dose cohort (23.1 [28.4]); more patients in the FDC cohort (34.2%) than in the free‐dose cohort (10.0%) were adherent (MPR ≥ 80%). The probability of treatment persistence and adherence increased with age (>80 vs <65 years, persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 12.5), polypharmacy (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6‐0.9]; MPR difference, 10.7) and previous use of AB (persistence HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7‐1.0]; MPR difference, 5.7) or AB/AM combinations (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5‐0.9]; MPR difference, 11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an AB/AM FDC is associated with better persistence and adherence vs a free‐dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-19 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7685104/ /pubmed/32681522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13616 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ny-nc License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Landeira, Margarita Mora Blázquez, Ana M. Martins de Almeida, Rodrigo Covernton, Patrick J. O. Medina‐Polo, José Montero, Antonio Alcántara A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title | A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title_full | A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title_short | A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain |
title_sort | retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free‐ vs fixed‐dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with luts in spain |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landeiramargarita aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT morablazquezanam aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT martinsdealmeidarodrigo aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT coverntonpatrickjo aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT medinapolojose aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT monteroantonioalcantara aretrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT landeiramargarita retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT morablazquezanam retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT martinsdealmeidarodrigo retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT coverntonpatrickjo retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT medinapolojose retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain AT monteroantonioalcantara retrospectiveanalysiscomparingpersistenceandadherencetotreatmentwithfreevsfixeddosecombinationofanalphablockerandanantimuscarinicagentinmenwithlutsinspain |