Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness of three flowable esthetic restorative materials after exposure to sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 210 specimens of dimension (2cm diameter and 2 mm thickness) with giomer, compomer, and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaidya, Naman, Kumar, Pravin, Pathak, Karishma, Punia, Sandhya K, Choudhary, Ashish, Patnana, Arun K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282767
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_246_20
_version_ 1783613155842195456
author Vaidya, Naman
Kumar, Pravin
Pathak, Karishma
Punia, Sandhya K
Choudhary, Ashish
Patnana, Arun K
author_facet Vaidya, Naman
Kumar, Pravin
Pathak, Karishma
Punia, Sandhya K
Choudhary, Ashish
Patnana, Arun K
author_sort Vaidya, Naman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness of three flowable esthetic restorative materials after exposure to sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 210 specimens of dimension (2cm diameter and 2 mm thickness) with giomer, compomer, and composite (70 samples with each esthetic material) were made with the help of plastic rings. The prepared samples were tested in six experimental sports/energy drinks (beer, whiskey, vodka, Gatorade, Red Bull, and Sting) and distilled water was considered as the control group. Profilometric analyses of all samples were recorded before immersing into the experimental and control solutions. Then, the samples were stored in the experimental and control group solutions for 5min for 30 days. The profilometric analysis was repeated after 30 days and records were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Flowable composite showed the minimum surface roughness, whereas the flowable compomer showed the maximum surface roughness in the present test conditions. When the erosive potential of the test solutions was evaluated, surface roughness values were more for sports/energy drinks when compared to that of alcoholic beverages. CONCLUSION: All the sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages evaluated in this study altered the surface roughness of the tested restorative materials. The effects ranged from slight to a markedly negative impact on the surface roughness of the test restorative materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7685280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76852802020-12-03 Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis Vaidya, Naman Kumar, Pravin Pathak, Karishma Punia, Sandhya K Choudhary, Ashish Patnana, Arun K J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness of three flowable esthetic restorative materials after exposure to sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 210 specimens of dimension (2cm diameter and 2 mm thickness) with giomer, compomer, and composite (70 samples with each esthetic material) were made with the help of plastic rings. The prepared samples were tested in six experimental sports/energy drinks (beer, whiskey, vodka, Gatorade, Red Bull, and Sting) and distilled water was considered as the control group. Profilometric analyses of all samples were recorded before immersing into the experimental and control solutions. Then, the samples were stored in the experimental and control group solutions for 5min for 30 days. The profilometric analysis was repeated after 30 days and records were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Flowable composite showed the minimum surface roughness, whereas the flowable compomer showed the maximum surface roughness in the present test conditions. When the erosive potential of the test solutions was evaluated, surface roughness values were more for sports/energy drinks when compared to that of alcoholic beverages. CONCLUSION: All the sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages evaluated in this study altered the surface roughness of the tested restorative materials. The effects ranged from slight to a markedly negative impact on the surface roughness of the test restorative materials. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7685280/ /pubmed/33282767 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_246_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vaidya, Naman
Kumar, Pravin
Pathak, Karishma
Punia, Sandhya K
Choudhary, Ashish
Patnana, Arun K
Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Different Sports/Energy Drinks and Alcoholic Beverages on the Surface Roughness of Three Different Flowable Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Analysis
title_sort comparative evaluation of the influence of different sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages on the surface roughness of three different flowable esthetic restorative materials: an in vitro analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282767
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_246_20
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidyanaman comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis
AT kumarpravin comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis
AT pathakkarishma comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis
AT puniasandhyak comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis
AT choudharyashish comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis
AT patnanaarunk comparativeevaluationoftheinfluenceofdifferentsportsenergydrinksandalcoholicbeveragesonthesurfaceroughnessofthreedifferentflowableestheticrestorativematerialsaninvitroanalysis