Cargando…
Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials
BACKGROUND: To identify mechanisms of cortical plasticity of the visual cortex and to quantify their significance, sensitive parameters are warranted. In this context, multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) can make a valuable contribution as they are not associated with cancellation artifacts...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-020-00600-5 |
_version_ | 1783613212586934272 |
---|---|
author | Kolbe, Robert Aytulun, Aykut Müller, Ann-Kristin Ringelstein, Marius Aktas, Orhan Schnitzler, Alfons Hartung, Hans-Peter Groiss, Stefan Jun Albrecht, Philipp |
author_facet | Kolbe, Robert Aytulun, Aykut Müller, Ann-Kristin Ringelstein, Marius Aktas, Orhan Schnitzler, Alfons Hartung, Hans-Peter Groiss, Stefan Jun Albrecht, Philipp |
author_sort | Kolbe, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To identify mechanisms of cortical plasticity of the visual cortex and to quantify their significance, sensitive parameters are warranted. In this context, multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) can make a valuable contribution as they are not associated with cancellation artifacts and include also the peripheral visual field. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce mfVEP changes. METHODS: 18 healthy participants were included in a single-blind crossover-study receiving sessions of excitatory, occipital 10 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation. MfVEP was performed before and after each rTMS session and changes in amplitude and latency between both sessions were compared using generalized estimation equation models. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in amplitude or latency between verum and sham group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that occipital 10 Hz rTMS has no effect on mfVEP measures, which is in line with previous studies using full field VEP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7685624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76856242020-11-25 Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials Kolbe, Robert Aytulun, Aykut Müller, Ann-Kristin Ringelstein, Marius Aktas, Orhan Schnitzler, Alfons Hartung, Hans-Peter Groiss, Stefan Jun Albrecht, Philipp BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: To identify mechanisms of cortical plasticity of the visual cortex and to quantify their significance, sensitive parameters are warranted. In this context, multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs) can make a valuable contribution as they are not associated with cancellation artifacts and include also the peripheral visual field. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce mfVEP changes. METHODS: 18 healthy participants were included in a single-blind crossover-study receiving sessions of excitatory, occipital 10 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation. MfVEP was performed before and after each rTMS session and changes in amplitude and latency between both sessions were compared using generalized estimation equation models. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in amplitude or latency between verum and sham group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that occipital 10 Hz rTMS has no effect on mfVEP measures, which is in line with previous studies using full field VEP. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7685624/ /pubmed/33228550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-020-00600-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kolbe, Robert Aytulun, Aykut Müller, Ann-Kristin Ringelstein, Marius Aktas, Orhan Schnitzler, Alfons Hartung, Hans-Peter Groiss, Stefan Jun Albrecht, Philipp Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title | Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_full | Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_short | Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_sort | occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-020-00600-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolberobert occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT aytulunaykut occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT mullerannkristin occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT ringelsteinmarius occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT aktasorhan occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT schnitzleralfons occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT hartunghanspeter occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT groissstefanjun occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT albrechtphilipp occipitalrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationdoesnotaffectmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials |