Cargando…

Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The jumping to conclusions bias (JTC) is considered to be an important causal factor in theoretical models for the formation and maintenance of delusions. However, recent meta-analytic findings show a rather equivocal pattern of results regarding associations between JTC and delusions. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pytlik, Nico, Soll, Daniel, Hesse, Klaus, Moritz, Steffen, Bechdolf, Andreas, Herrlich, Jutta, Kircher, Tilo, Klingberg, Stefan, Landsberg, Martin W., Müller, Bernhard W., Wiedemann, Georg, Wittorf, Andreas, Wölwer, Wolfgang, Wagner, Michael, Mehl, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5
_version_ 1783613216102809600
author Pytlik, Nico
Soll, Daniel
Hesse, Klaus
Moritz, Steffen
Bechdolf, Andreas
Herrlich, Jutta
Kircher, Tilo
Klingberg, Stefan
Landsberg, Martin W.
Müller, Bernhard W.
Wiedemann, Georg
Wittorf, Andreas
Wölwer, Wolfgang
Wagner, Michael
Mehl, Stephanie
author_facet Pytlik, Nico
Soll, Daniel
Hesse, Klaus
Moritz, Steffen
Bechdolf, Andreas
Herrlich, Jutta
Kircher, Tilo
Klingberg, Stefan
Landsberg, Martin W.
Müller, Bernhard W.
Wiedemann, Georg
Wittorf, Andreas
Wölwer, Wolfgang
Wagner, Michael
Mehl, Stephanie
author_sort Pytlik, Nico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The jumping to conclusions bias (JTC) is considered to be an important causal factor in theoretical models for the formation and maintenance of delusions. However, recent meta-analytic findings show a rather equivocal pattern of results regarding associations between JTC and delusions. Thus, the present study aims to investigate in a large sample whether the JTC-bias is more pronounced in patients with psychotic disorders in comparison to controls and whether the JTC bias is associated with a more severe delusional conviction, persecutory delusions, and positive symptoms in general. METHODS: Patients with psychotic disorders (n = 300) enrolled in a therapy trial and healthy controls (n = 51) conducted a variant of the beads task (fish task) as a measure for the JTC-bias at the start of the trial. Further, clinical interviews were used to assess patients’ delusional severity and delusional conviction. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between patients with psychotic disorders (with 53% displaying the JTC-bias) and controls (41%). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant correlations between JTC measures and persecutory delusions, delusional conviction, and positive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in JTC between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, which is in part in line with meta-analytic findings using a wide range of JTC task variants. Interestingly, patients with psychotic disorders displayed JTC rates commonly found in the literature, while healthy control subjects showed an unexpectedly high level of JTC. The task variant we used in the present study (fish task) is discussed as a potential reason for our results, as it may induce a more deliberative reasoning style in controls as compared to the traditional beads task. Furthermore, possible implications for the measurement of the JTC-bias, in general, are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29242879 (isrctn.com), date of registration: April 12th 2006, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7685639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76856392020-11-25 Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial Pytlik, Nico Soll, Daniel Hesse, Klaus Moritz, Steffen Bechdolf, Andreas Herrlich, Jutta Kircher, Tilo Klingberg, Stefan Landsberg, Martin W. Müller, Bernhard W. Wiedemann, Georg Wittorf, Andreas Wölwer, Wolfgang Wagner, Michael Mehl, Stephanie BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The jumping to conclusions bias (JTC) is considered to be an important causal factor in theoretical models for the formation and maintenance of delusions. However, recent meta-analytic findings show a rather equivocal pattern of results regarding associations between JTC and delusions. Thus, the present study aims to investigate in a large sample whether the JTC-bias is more pronounced in patients with psychotic disorders in comparison to controls and whether the JTC bias is associated with a more severe delusional conviction, persecutory delusions, and positive symptoms in general. METHODS: Patients with psychotic disorders (n = 300) enrolled in a therapy trial and healthy controls (n = 51) conducted a variant of the beads task (fish task) as a measure for the JTC-bias at the start of the trial. Further, clinical interviews were used to assess patients’ delusional severity and delusional conviction. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between patients with psychotic disorders (with 53% displaying the JTC-bias) and controls (41%). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant correlations between JTC measures and persecutory delusions, delusional conviction, and positive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in JTC between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, which is in part in line with meta-analytic findings using a wide range of JTC task variants. Interestingly, patients with psychotic disorders displayed JTC rates commonly found in the literature, while healthy control subjects showed an unexpectedly high level of JTC. The task variant we used in the present study (fish task) is discussed as a potential reason for our results, as it may induce a more deliberative reasoning style in controls as compared to the traditional beads task. Furthermore, possible implications for the measurement of the JTC-bias, in general, are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29242879 (isrctn.com), date of registration: April 12th 2006, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7685639/ /pubmed/33228583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pytlik, Nico
Soll, Daniel
Hesse, Klaus
Moritz, Steffen
Bechdolf, Andreas
Herrlich, Jutta
Kircher, Tilo
Klingberg, Stefan
Landsberg, Martin W.
Müller, Bernhard W.
Wiedemann, Georg
Wittorf, Andreas
Wölwer, Wolfgang
Wagner, Michael
Mehl, Stephanie
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort problems in measuring the jtc-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pytliknico problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solldaniel problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hesseklaus problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moritzsteffen problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bechdolfandreas problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT herrlichjutta problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kirchertilo problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klingbergstefan problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT landsbergmartinw problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mullerbernhardw problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wiedemanngeorg problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wittorfandreas problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolwerwolfgang problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wagnermichael problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehlstephanie problemsinmeasuringthejtcbiasinpatientswithpsychoticdisorderswiththefishtaskasecondaryanalysisofabaselineassessmentofarandomizedcontrolledtrial