Cargando…

Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection

BACKGROUND: Given that an individual’s age and gender are strongly predictive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, do such factors imply anything about preferable therapeutic options? METHODS: An analysis of electronic health records for a large (68,466-case), international COVID-19 coho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seeland, Ute, Coluzzi, Flaminia, Simmaco, Maurizio, Mura, Cameron, Bourne, Philip E., Heiland, Max, Preissner, Robert, Preissner, Saskia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z
_version_ 1783613234945720320
author Seeland, Ute
Coluzzi, Flaminia
Simmaco, Maurizio
Mura, Cameron
Bourne, Philip E.
Heiland, Max
Preissner, Robert
Preissner, Saskia
author_facet Seeland, Ute
Coluzzi, Flaminia
Simmaco, Maurizio
Mura, Cameron
Bourne, Philip E.
Heiland, Max
Preissner, Robert
Preissner, Saskia
author_sort Seeland, Ute
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given that an individual’s age and gender are strongly predictive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, do such factors imply anything about preferable therapeutic options? METHODS: An analysis of electronic health records for a large (68,466-case), international COVID-19 cohort, in 5-year age strata, revealed age-dependent sex differences. In particular, we surveyed the effects of systemic hormone administration in women. The primary outcome for estradiol therapy was death. Odds ratios (ORs) and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed for 37,086 COVID-19 women in two age groups: pre- (15–49 years) and peri-/post-menopausal (> 50 years). RESULTS: The incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is higher in women than men (by about + 15%) and, in contrast, the fatality rate is higher in men (about + 50%). Interestingly, the relationships between these quantities are linked to age: pre-adolescent girls and boys had the same risk of infection and fatality rate, while adult premenopausal women had a significantly higher risk of infection than men in the same 5-year age stratum (about 16,000 vs. 12,000 cases). This ratio changed again in peri- and postmenopausal women, with infection susceptibility converging with men. While fatality rates increased continuously with age for both sexes, at 50 years, there was a steeper increase for men. Thus far, these types of intricacies have been largely neglected. Because the hormone 17ß-estradiol influences expression of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein, which plays a role in SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry, propensity score matching was performed for the women’s sub-cohort, comparing users vs. non-users of estradiol. This retrospective study of hormone therapy in female COVID-19 patients shows that the fatality risk for women > 50 years receiving estradiol therapy (user group) is reduced by more than 50%; the OR was 0.33, 95% CI [0.18, 0.62] and the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.29, 95% CI [0.11,0.76]. For younger, pre-menopausal women (15–49 years), the risk of COVID-19 fatality is the same irrespective of estradiol treatment, probably because of higher endogenous estradiol levels. CONCLUSIONS: As of this writing, still no effective drug treatment is available for COVID-19; since estradiol shows such a strong improvement regarding fatality in COVID-19, we suggest prospective studies on the potentially more broadly protective roles of this naturally occurring hormone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7685778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76857782020-11-25 Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection Seeland, Ute Coluzzi, Flaminia Simmaco, Maurizio Mura, Cameron Bourne, Philip E. Heiland, Max Preissner, Robert Preissner, Saskia BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Given that an individual’s age and gender are strongly predictive of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, do such factors imply anything about preferable therapeutic options? METHODS: An analysis of electronic health records for a large (68,466-case), international COVID-19 cohort, in 5-year age strata, revealed age-dependent sex differences. In particular, we surveyed the effects of systemic hormone administration in women. The primary outcome for estradiol therapy was death. Odds ratios (ORs) and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed for 37,086 COVID-19 women in two age groups: pre- (15–49 years) and peri-/post-menopausal (> 50 years). RESULTS: The incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is higher in women than men (by about + 15%) and, in contrast, the fatality rate is higher in men (about + 50%). Interestingly, the relationships between these quantities are linked to age: pre-adolescent girls and boys had the same risk of infection and fatality rate, while adult premenopausal women had a significantly higher risk of infection than men in the same 5-year age stratum (about 16,000 vs. 12,000 cases). This ratio changed again in peri- and postmenopausal women, with infection susceptibility converging with men. While fatality rates increased continuously with age for both sexes, at 50 years, there was a steeper increase for men. Thus far, these types of intricacies have been largely neglected. Because the hormone 17ß-estradiol influences expression of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein, which plays a role in SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry, propensity score matching was performed for the women’s sub-cohort, comparing users vs. non-users of estradiol. This retrospective study of hormone therapy in female COVID-19 patients shows that the fatality risk for women > 50 years receiving estradiol therapy (user group) is reduced by more than 50%; the OR was 0.33, 95% CI [0.18, 0.62] and the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.29, 95% CI [0.11,0.76]. For younger, pre-menopausal women (15–49 years), the risk of COVID-19 fatality is the same irrespective of estradiol treatment, probably because of higher endogenous estradiol levels. CONCLUSIONS: As of this writing, still no effective drug treatment is available for COVID-19; since estradiol shows such a strong improvement regarding fatality in COVID-19, we suggest prospective studies on the potentially more broadly protective roles of this naturally occurring hormone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z. BioMed Central 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7685778/ /pubmed/33234138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seeland, Ute
Coluzzi, Flaminia
Simmaco, Maurizio
Mura, Cameron
Bourne, Philip E.
Heiland, Max
Preissner, Robert
Preissner, Saskia
Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_full Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_fullStr Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_short Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection
title_sort evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with sars-cov-2 infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01851-z
work_keys_str_mv AT seelandute evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT coluzziflaminia evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT simmacomaurizio evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT muracameron evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT bournephilipe evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT heilandmax evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT preissnerrobert evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection
AT preissnersaskia evidencefortreatmentwithestradiolforwomenwithsarscov2infection