Cargando…

Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice

A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwak, Seongsung, Kang, Won-ho, Rhee, Chang-Hoon, Yang, Gi-Hyeok, Cruz, Deu John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402
_version_ 1783613262282096640
author Kwak, Seongsung
Kang, Won-ho
Rhee, Chang-Hoon
Yang, Gi-Hyeok
Cruz, Deu John M.
author_facet Kwak, Seongsung
Kang, Won-ho
Rhee, Chang-Hoon
Yang, Gi-Hyeok
Cruz, Deu John M.
author_sort Kwak, Seongsung
collection PubMed
description A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation efficacy of 3 different botulinum toxin Type A preparations in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Efficacy and duration of action of CBoNT, OBoNT, and IBoNT after a single intramuscular injection to the right gastrocnemius was evaluated by digit abduction score (DAS) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) assays. RESULTS: Mouse DAS and CMAP responses were comparable between CBoNT and OBoNT, indicating similar paresis and chemodenervation efficacy, as well as duration of action. Both botulinum toxins showed significantly higher efficacy and longer duration of action than IBoNT. Similarly, mean DAS potency of CBoNT (ED(50): 3.85 ± 0.34 U/kg) and OBoNT (ED(50): 4.13 ± 0.07 U/kg) were significantly higher compared with IBoNT (ED(50): 6.70 ± 0.83 U/kg). CONCLUSION: CBoNT displays the same efficacy as OBoNT as shown by their comparable chemodenervation and local paretic effects, and demonstrates superior efficacy and duration of action compared with IBoNT. Likewise, CBoNT has comparable DAS potency to OBoNT and is superior to IBoNT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7685929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76859292020-12-01 Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice Kwak, Seongsung Kang, Won-ho Rhee, Chang-Hoon Yang, Gi-Hyeok Cruz, Deu John M. Dermatol Surg Original Article A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation efficacy of 3 different botulinum toxin Type A preparations in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Efficacy and duration of action of CBoNT, OBoNT, and IBoNT after a single intramuscular injection to the right gastrocnemius was evaluated by digit abduction score (DAS) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) assays. RESULTS: Mouse DAS and CMAP responses were comparable between CBoNT and OBoNT, indicating similar paresis and chemodenervation efficacy, as well as duration of action. Both botulinum toxins showed significantly higher efficacy and longer duration of action than IBoNT. Similarly, mean DAS potency of CBoNT (ED(50): 3.85 ± 0.34 U/kg) and OBoNT (ED(50): 4.13 ± 0.07 U/kg) were significantly higher compared with IBoNT (ED(50): 6.70 ± 0.83 U/kg). CONCLUSION: CBoNT displays the same efficacy as OBoNT as shown by their comparable chemodenervation and local paretic effects, and demonstrates superior efficacy and duration of action compared with IBoNT. Likewise, CBoNT has comparable DAS potency to OBoNT and is superior to IBoNT. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7685929/ /pubmed/32251006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwak, Seongsung
Kang, Won-ho
Rhee, Chang-Hoon
Yang, Gi-Hyeok
Cruz, Deu John M.
Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title_full Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title_fullStr Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title_short Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
title_sort comparative pharmacodynamics study of 3 different botulinum toxin type a preparations in mice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402
work_keys_str_mv AT kwakseongsung comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice
AT kangwonho comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice
AT rheechanghoon comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice
AT yanggihyeok comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice
AT cruzdeujohnm comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice