Cargando…
Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice
A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation effica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402 |
_version_ | 1783613262282096640 |
---|---|
author | Kwak, Seongsung Kang, Won-ho Rhee, Chang-Hoon Yang, Gi-Hyeok Cruz, Deu John M. |
author_facet | Kwak, Seongsung Kang, Won-ho Rhee, Chang-Hoon Yang, Gi-Hyeok Cruz, Deu John M. |
author_sort | Kwak, Seongsung |
collection | PubMed |
description | A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation efficacy of 3 different botulinum toxin Type A preparations in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Efficacy and duration of action of CBoNT, OBoNT, and IBoNT after a single intramuscular injection to the right gastrocnemius was evaluated by digit abduction score (DAS) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) assays. RESULTS: Mouse DAS and CMAP responses were comparable between CBoNT and OBoNT, indicating similar paresis and chemodenervation efficacy, as well as duration of action. Both botulinum toxins showed significantly higher efficacy and longer duration of action than IBoNT. Similarly, mean DAS potency of CBoNT (ED(50): 3.85 ± 0.34 U/kg) and OBoNT (ED(50): 4.13 ± 0.07 U/kg) were significantly higher compared with IBoNT (ED(50): 6.70 ± 0.83 U/kg). CONCLUSION: CBoNT displays the same efficacy as OBoNT as shown by their comparable chemodenervation and local paretic effects, and demonstrates superior efficacy and duration of action compared with IBoNT. Likewise, CBoNT has comparable DAS potency to OBoNT and is superior to IBoNT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7685929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76859292020-12-01 Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice Kwak, Seongsung Kang, Won-ho Rhee, Chang-Hoon Yang, Gi-Hyeok Cruz, Deu John M. Dermatol Surg Original Article A new complexing protein-free botulinum toxin Type A (CBoNT) with the same mechanism of action as the botulinum toxin complex onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) and complexing protein-free incobotulinumtoxinA (IBoNT) was recently developed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the local paresis and chemodenervation efficacy of 3 different botulinum toxin Type A preparations in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Efficacy and duration of action of CBoNT, OBoNT, and IBoNT after a single intramuscular injection to the right gastrocnemius was evaluated by digit abduction score (DAS) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) assays. RESULTS: Mouse DAS and CMAP responses were comparable between CBoNT and OBoNT, indicating similar paresis and chemodenervation efficacy, as well as duration of action. Both botulinum toxins showed significantly higher efficacy and longer duration of action than IBoNT. Similarly, mean DAS potency of CBoNT (ED(50): 3.85 ± 0.34 U/kg) and OBoNT (ED(50): 4.13 ± 0.07 U/kg) were significantly higher compared with IBoNT (ED(50): 6.70 ± 0.83 U/kg). CONCLUSION: CBoNT displays the same efficacy as OBoNT as shown by their comparable chemodenervation and local paretic effects, and demonstrates superior efficacy and duration of action compared with IBoNT. Likewise, CBoNT has comparable DAS potency to OBoNT and is superior to IBoNT. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7685929/ /pubmed/32251006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kwak, Seongsung Kang, Won-ho Rhee, Chang-Hoon Yang, Gi-Hyeok Cruz, Deu John M. Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title | Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title_full | Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title_fullStr | Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title_short | Comparative Pharmacodynamics Study of 3 Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations in Mice |
title_sort | comparative pharmacodynamics study of 3 different botulinum toxin type a preparations in mice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwakseongsung comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice AT kangwonho comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice AT rheechanghoon comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice AT yanggihyeok comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice AT cruzdeujohnm comparativepharmacodynamicsstudyof3differentbotulinumtoxintypeapreparationsinmice |