Cargando…
Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x |
_version_ | 1783613278083088384 |
---|---|
author | Jaafar, Gona Sandblom, Gabriel Lundell, Lars Hammarqvist, Folke |
author_facet | Jaafar, Gona Sandblom, Gabriel Lundell, Lars Hammarqvist, Folke |
author_sort | Jaafar, Gona |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of bacteriobilia, CRP values and leucocyte counts. METHODS: The study was performed as a single-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Patients with acute cholecystitis amenable for acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either PAP (piperacillin/ tazobactam) or placebo, and the subsequent clinical course was followed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, 16 of whom were excluded due to protocol violation. PIC developed in 22 of the 90 patients included with no significant difference between the PAP and placebo groups (8 patients in the PAP group and 14 in the placebo arm, p = 0.193). The PIC rate was significantly higher in patients with a raised CRP at randomisation and on the day of surgery and in cases of conversion to an open procedure (p = 0.008, 0.004 and 0.017, respectively) but with no differences between the study groups. CONCLUSION: PAP does not affect the risk for PIC in patients with acute cholecystitis. The major risk factors determining PIC in these patients need defining, in particular, the impact of bacteriobilia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02619149) December 2, 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7686002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76860022020-11-30 Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial Jaafar, Gona Sandblom, Gabriel Lundell, Lars Hammarqvist, Folke Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trials PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of bacteriobilia, CRP values and leucocyte counts. METHODS: The study was performed as a single-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Patients with acute cholecystitis amenable for acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either PAP (piperacillin/ tazobactam) or placebo, and the subsequent clinical course was followed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, 16 of whom were excluded due to protocol violation. PIC developed in 22 of the 90 patients included with no significant difference between the PAP and placebo groups (8 patients in the PAP group and 14 in the placebo arm, p = 0.193). The PIC rate was significantly higher in patients with a raised CRP at randomisation and on the day of surgery and in cases of conversion to an open procedure (p = 0.008, 0.004 and 0.017, respectively) but with no differences between the study groups. CONCLUSION: PAP does not affect the risk for PIC in patients with acute cholecystitis. The major risk factors determining PIC in these patients need defining, in particular, the impact of bacteriobilia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02619149) December 2, 2015. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7686002/ /pubmed/32860109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Controlled Clinical Trials Jaafar, Gona Sandblom, Gabriel Lundell, Lars Hammarqvist, Folke Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title | Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
topic | Controlled Clinical Trials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaafargona antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sandblomgabriel antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lundelllars antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hammarqvistfolke antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial |