Cargando…

Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaafar, Gona, Sandblom, Gabriel, Lundell, Lars, Hammarqvist, Folke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x
_version_ 1783613278083088384
author Jaafar, Gona
Sandblom, Gabriel
Lundell, Lars
Hammarqvist, Folke
author_facet Jaafar, Gona
Sandblom, Gabriel
Lundell, Lars
Hammarqvist, Folke
author_sort Jaafar, Gona
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of bacteriobilia, CRP values and leucocyte counts. METHODS: The study was performed as a single-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Patients with acute cholecystitis amenable for acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either PAP (piperacillin/ tazobactam) or placebo, and the subsequent clinical course was followed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, 16 of whom were excluded due to protocol violation. PIC developed in 22 of the 90 patients included with no significant difference between the PAP and placebo groups (8 patients in the PAP group and 14 in the placebo arm, p = 0.193). The PIC rate was significantly higher in patients with a raised CRP at randomisation and on the day of surgery and in cases of conversion to an open procedure (p = 0.008, 0.004 and 0.017, respectively) but with no differences between the study groups. CONCLUSION: PAP does not affect the risk for PIC in patients with acute cholecystitis. The major risk factors determining PIC in these patients need defining, in particular, the impact of bacteriobilia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02619149) December 2, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76860022020-11-30 Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial Jaafar, Gona Sandblom, Gabriel Lundell, Lars Hammarqvist, Folke Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trials PURPOSE: Evidence supporting the value of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in surgery for acute cholecystitis is lacking. This study aimed to shed light on whether PAP in acute cholecystectomy for cholecystitis reduces the postoperative infectious complication (PIC) rate. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of bacteriobilia, CRP values and leucocyte counts. METHODS: The study was performed as a single-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Patients with acute cholecystitis amenable for acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either PAP (piperacillin/ tazobactam) or placebo, and the subsequent clinical course was followed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, 16 of whom were excluded due to protocol violation. PIC developed in 22 of the 90 patients included with no significant difference between the PAP and placebo groups (8 patients in the PAP group and 14 in the placebo arm, p = 0.193). The PIC rate was significantly higher in patients with a raised CRP at randomisation and on the day of surgery and in cases of conversion to an open procedure (p = 0.008, 0.004 and 0.017, respectively) but with no differences between the study groups. CONCLUSION: PAP does not affect the risk for PIC in patients with acute cholecystitis. The major risk factors determining PIC in these patients need defining, in particular, the impact of bacteriobilia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02619149) December 2, 2015. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7686002/ /pubmed/32860109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Controlled Clinical Trials
Jaafar, Gona
Sandblom, Gabriel
Lundell, Lars
Hammarqvist, Folke
Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_short Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_sort antibiotic prophylaxis in acute cholecystectomy revisited: results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial
topic Controlled Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01977-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jaafargona antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sandblomgabriel antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lundelllars antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hammarqvistfolke antibioticprophylaxisinacutecholecystectomyrevisitedresultsofadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial