Cargando…

Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary video consultations are one method of improving coherence and coordination of care in cancer patients, but knowledge of user perspectives is lacking. Continuity of care is expected to have a significant impact on the quality of cancer care. Enhanced task clarification and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trabjerg, Theis Bitz, Jensen, Lars Henrik, Søndergaard, Jens, Sisler, Jeffrey James, Hansen, Dorte Gilså
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05467-0
_version_ 1783613278333698048
author Trabjerg, Theis Bitz
Jensen, Lars Henrik
Søndergaard, Jens
Sisler, Jeffrey James
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
author_facet Trabjerg, Theis Bitz
Jensen, Lars Henrik
Søndergaard, Jens
Sisler, Jeffrey James
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
author_sort Trabjerg, Theis Bitz
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary video consultations are one method of improving coherence and coordination of care in cancer patients, but knowledge of user perspectives is lacking. Continuity of care is expected to have a significant impact on the quality of cancer care. Enhanced task clarification and shared responsibility between the patient, oncologist and general practitioner through video consultations might provide enhanced continuity in cancer care. METHOD: We used descriptive survey data from patients and doctors in the intervention group based on a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the user perspectives and fidelity of the intervention. RESULTS: Patients expressed that they were able to present their concerns in 95% of the consultations, and believed it was beneficial to have both their doctors present in 84%. The general practitioner and oncologist found that tripartite video consultation would lead to better coordination of care in almost 90% of the consultations. However, the benefits of handling social issues and comorbidity were sparser. Consultations were not accomplished in 11% due to technical problems and sound and video quality were non-satisfactory in 20%. CONCLUSION: Overall, multidisciplinary video consultations between cancer patient, general practitioner and oncologist were feasible in daily clinics. Initial barriers to address were technical issues and seamless planning. Patients reported high satisfaction, patient centredness and clarity of roles. General practitioners and oncologists were overall positive regarding role clarification and continuity, although less pronounced than patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clincialtrials.gov, NCT02716168.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76860032020-11-30 Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners Trabjerg, Theis Bitz Jensen, Lars Henrik Søndergaard, Jens Sisler, Jeffrey James Hansen, Dorte Gilså Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary video consultations are one method of improving coherence and coordination of care in cancer patients, but knowledge of user perspectives is lacking. Continuity of care is expected to have a significant impact on the quality of cancer care. Enhanced task clarification and shared responsibility between the patient, oncologist and general practitioner through video consultations might provide enhanced continuity in cancer care. METHOD: We used descriptive survey data from patients and doctors in the intervention group based on a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the user perspectives and fidelity of the intervention. RESULTS: Patients expressed that they were able to present their concerns in 95% of the consultations, and believed it was beneficial to have both their doctors present in 84%. The general practitioner and oncologist found that tripartite video consultation would lead to better coordination of care in almost 90% of the consultations. However, the benefits of handling social issues and comorbidity were sparser. Consultations were not accomplished in 11% due to technical problems and sound and video quality were non-satisfactory in 20%. CONCLUSION: Overall, multidisciplinary video consultations between cancer patient, general practitioner and oncologist were feasible in daily clinics. Initial barriers to address were technical issues and seamless planning. Patients reported high satisfaction, patient centredness and clarity of roles. General practitioners and oncologists were overall positive regarding role clarification and continuity, although less pronounced than patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clincialtrials.gov, NCT02716168. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7686003/ /pubmed/32318872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05467-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Trabjerg, Theis Bitz
Jensen, Lars Henrik
Søndergaard, Jens
Sisler, Jeffrey James
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title_full Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title_fullStr Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title_short Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
title_sort cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05467-0
work_keys_str_mv AT trabjergtheisbitz crosssectoralvideoconsultationsincancercareperspectivesofcancerpatientsoncologistsandgeneralpractitioners
AT jensenlarshenrik crosssectoralvideoconsultationsincancercareperspectivesofcancerpatientsoncologistsandgeneralpractitioners
AT søndergaardjens crosssectoralvideoconsultationsincancercareperspectivesofcancerpatientsoncologistsandgeneralpractitioners
AT sislerjeffreyjames crosssectoralvideoconsultationsincancercareperspectivesofcancerpatientsoncologistsandgeneralpractitioners
AT hansendortegilsa crosssectoralvideoconsultationsincancercareperspectivesofcancerpatientsoncologistsandgeneralpractitioners