Cargando…

Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study

PURPOSE: Existing research indicates that physical activity (PA) is beneficial to men with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined the potential of a single-contact peer-support-based behavioural intervention to promote PA engagement in men treated for PCa. METHODS: A mixed methods design was employed, c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Louis, Wiseman, Theresa, Cahill, Declan, Fleure, Louisa, Kinsella, Janette, Curtis, Emily, Peat, Nicola, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32323003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4
_version_ 1783613292179095552
author Fox, Louis
Wiseman, Theresa
Cahill, Declan
Fleure, Louisa
Kinsella, Janette
Curtis, Emily
Peat, Nicola
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_facet Fox, Louis
Wiseman, Theresa
Cahill, Declan
Fleure, Louisa
Kinsella, Janette
Curtis, Emily
Peat, Nicola
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_sort Fox, Louis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Existing research indicates that physical activity (PA) is beneficial to men with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined the potential of a single-contact peer-support-based behavioural intervention to promote PA engagement in men treated for PCa. METHODS: A mixed methods design was employed, comprising a two-arm pragmatic trial and semi-structured interviews. The intervention was a 10-min PA-based presentation by a former patient, delivered in group seminars that are provided for patients as standard care. Seminars were alternately allocated to (a) cancer exercise specialist talk + patient speaker talk or (b) cancer exercise specialist talk only. Self-reported PA, exercise motivation, quality of life, fatigue and clinical and demographic characteristics were obtained from n = 148 (intervention: n = 69; control: n = 79) patients immediately prior to the seminar, and at follow-up ≈ 100 days later. Data were analysed using ANCOVA models and χ(2) tests. Fourteen semi-structured interviews with intervention participants, which explored how the intervention was experienced, were analysed using a grounded theory-style approach. RESULTS: The intervention had no significant effect on quantitatively self-reported PA (p = 0.4). However, the intervention was statistically and clinically beneficial for fatigue (p = 0.04) and quality of life (p = 0.01). Qualitative analysis showed that the intervention was beneficial to psychological wellbeing and some participants had increased intention to engage in PA as a result of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A brief one-off PA-based presentation for men with PCa, delivered by a former patient alongside cancer exercise specialist advice, may result in clinically significant benefits to quality of life and may influence PA intention in certain individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76861882020-11-30 Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study Fox, Louis Wiseman, Theresa Cahill, Declan Fleure, Louisa Kinsella, Janette Curtis, Emily Peat, Nicola Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Existing research indicates that physical activity (PA) is beneficial to men with prostate cancer (PCa). We examined the potential of a single-contact peer-support-based behavioural intervention to promote PA engagement in men treated for PCa. METHODS: A mixed methods design was employed, comprising a two-arm pragmatic trial and semi-structured interviews. The intervention was a 10-min PA-based presentation by a former patient, delivered in group seminars that are provided for patients as standard care. Seminars were alternately allocated to (a) cancer exercise specialist talk + patient speaker talk or (b) cancer exercise specialist talk only. Self-reported PA, exercise motivation, quality of life, fatigue and clinical and demographic characteristics were obtained from n = 148 (intervention: n = 69; control: n = 79) patients immediately prior to the seminar, and at follow-up ≈ 100 days later. Data were analysed using ANCOVA models and χ(2) tests. Fourteen semi-structured interviews with intervention participants, which explored how the intervention was experienced, were analysed using a grounded theory-style approach. RESULTS: The intervention had no significant effect on quantitatively self-reported PA (p = 0.4). However, the intervention was statistically and clinically beneficial for fatigue (p = 0.04) and quality of life (p = 0.01). Qualitative analysis showed that the intervention was beneficial to psychological wellbeing and some participants had increased intention to engage in PA as a result of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A brief one-off PA-based presentation for men with PCa, delivered by a former patient alongside cancer exercise specialist advice, may result in clinically significant benefits to quality of life and may influence PA intention in certain individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7686188/ /pubmed/32323003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fox, Louis
Wiseman, Theresa
Cahill, Declan
Fleure, Louisa
Kinsella, Janette
Curtis, Emily
Peat, Nicola
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title_full Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title_fullStr Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title_short Effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
title_sort effect of a brief physical activity-based presentation by a former patient for men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a mixed methods pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32323003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05455-4
work_keys_str_mv AT foxlouis effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT wisemantheresa effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT cahilldeclan effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT fleurelouisa effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT kinsellajanette effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT curtisemily effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT peatnicola effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy
AT vanhemelrijckmieke effectofabriefphysicalactivitybasedpresentationbyaformerpatientformentreatedwithradicalprostatectomyforprostatecanceramixedmethodspilotstudy