Cargando…
Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis
INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency has suspended the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) in the treatment of uterine fibroids and is reassessing its association with a risk of liver injury. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to characterize the post-marketing reporting of drug-induced liver injury...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00975-8 |
_version_ | 1783613294285684736 |
---|---|
author | Gatti, Milo Poluzzi, Elisabetta De Ponti, Fabrizio Raschi, Emanuel |
author_facet | Gatti, Milo Poluzzi, Elisabetta De Ponti, Fabrizio Raschi, Emanuel |
author_sort | Gatti, Milo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency has suspended the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) in the treatment of uterine fibroids and is reassessing its association with a risk of liver injury. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to characterize the post-marketing reporting of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with UPA and investigate the underlying pharmacological basis. METHODS: We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and performed a disproportionality analysis, selecting only hepatic designated medical events (DMEs) where UPA was reported as suspect. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated, and we considered a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1 as significant. Physiochemical/pharmacokinetic features were extracted to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity by applying predictive DILI risk models. Mifepristone and leuprolide were selected as comparators. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of liver disorders was reported for UPA than for mifepristone (2.9 vs. 0.8%; p < 0.00001) and leuprolide (2.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015). As regards hepatic DMEs, statistically significant RORs were found for autoimmune hepatitis (N = 5; LL95% CI 16.8), DILI (n = 5; LL95% CI 5.9), and acute hepatic failure (N = 5; LL95% CI 9.3). No signals of DILI emerged for mifepristone and leuprolide acetate. UPA and mifepristone showed high lipophilicity and hepatic metabolism (predicted intermediate DILI risk). Leuprolide exhibited contrasting features, resulting in no DILI concern. Inhibition of different liver transporters and the presence of a reactive metabolite were also recognised for UPA. CONCLUSION: Different drug properties previously linked to the occurrence of DILI may partially explain the reporting pattern observed with UPA. Our “bedside-to-bench” approach may support regulators in the risk–benefit assessment of UPA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-020-00975-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7686198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76861982020-11-30 Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis Gatti, Milo Poluzzi, Elisabetta De Ponti, Fabrizio Raschi, Emanuel Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency has suspended the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) in the treatment of uterine fibroids and is reassessing its association with a risk of liver injury. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to characterize the post-marketing reporting of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with UPA and investigate the underlying pharmacological basis. METHODS: We queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and performed a disproportionality analysis, selecting only hepatic designated medical events (DMEs) where UPA was reported as suspect. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated, and we considered a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95% CI) > 1 as significant. Physiochemical/pharmacokinetic features were extracted to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity by applying predictive DILI risk models. Mifepristone and leuprolide were selected as comparators. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of liver disorders was reported for UPA than for mifepristone (2.9 vs. 0.8%; p < 0.00001) and leuprolide (2.9 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015). As regards hepatic DMEs, statistically significant RORs were found for autoimmune hepatitis (N = 5; LL95% CI 16.8), DILI (n = 5; LL95% CI 5.9), and acute hepatic failure (N = 5; LL95% CI 9.3). No signals of DILI emerged for mifepristone and leuprolide acetate. UPA and mifepristone showed high lipophilicity and hepatic metabolism (predicted intermediate DILI risk). Leuprolide exhibited contrasting features, resulting in no DILI concern. Inhibition of different liver transporters and the presence of a reactive metabolite were also recognised for UPA. CONCLUSION: Different drug properties previously linked to the occurrence of DILI may partially explain the reporting pattern observed with UPA. Our “bedside-to-bench” approach may support regulators in the risk–benefit assessment of UPA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-020-00975-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7686198/ /pubmed/32748236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00975-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Gatti, Milo Poluzzi, Elisabetta De Ponti, Fabrizio Raschi, Emanuel Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title | Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title_full | Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title_fullStr | Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title_full_unstemmed | Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title_short | Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis |
title_sort | liver injury with ulipristal acetate: exploring the underlying pharmacological basis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00975-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gattimilo liverinjurywithulipristalacetateexploringtheunderlyingpharmacologicalbasis AT poluzzielisabetta liverinjurywithulipristalacetateexploringtheunderlyingpharmacologicalbasis AT depontifabrizio liverinjurywithulipristalacetateexploringtheunderlyingpharmacologicalbasis AT raschiemanuel liverinjurywithulipristalacetateexploringtheunderlyingpharmacologicalbasis |