Cargando…

Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models

Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganguly, Koustav, Nordström, Axel, Thimraj, Tania A., Rahman, Mizanur, Ramström, Malin, Sompa, Shanzina I., Lin, Elizabeth Z., O’Brien, Fiona, Koelmel, Jeremy, Ernstgård, Lena, Johanson, Gunnar, Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri, Palmberg, Lena, Upadhyay, Swapna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w
_version_ 1783613321168027648
author Ganguly, Koustav
Nordström, Axel
Thimraj, Tania A.
Rahman, Mizanur
Ramström, Malin
Sompa, Shanzina I.
Lin, Elizabeth Z.
O’Brien, Fiona
Koelmel, Jeremy
Ernstgård, Lena
Johanson, Gunnar
Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri
Palmberg, Lena
Upadhyay, Swapna
author_facet Ganguly, Koustav
Nordström, Axel
Thimraj, Tania A.
Rahman, Mizanur
Ramström, Malin
Sompa, Shanzina I.
Lin, Elizabeth Z.
O’Brien, Fiona
Koelmel, Jeremy
Ernstgård, Lena
Johanson, Gunnar
Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri
Palmberg, Lena
Upadhyay, Swapna
author_sort Ganguly, Koustav
collection PubMed
description Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on physiologically relevant human bronchial and alveolar lung mucosa models cultured at air–liquid interface. E-smoke was characterized by significantly increased particle number concentrations with increased wattage (25, 40, and 55 W) and nicotine presence. The chemical composition of E-smoke differed across the two tested flavors in terms of cytotoxic compounds including p-benzoquinone, nicotyrine, and flavoring agents (for example vanillin, ethyl vanillin). Significant differences in the expression of markers for pro-inflammation, oxidative stress, tissue injury/repair, alarm anti-protease, anti-microbial defense, epithelial barrier function, and epigenetic modification were observed between the flavors, nicotine content, and/ or lung models (bronchial or alveolar). Our findings indicate that ECIG toxicity is influenced by combination of multiple factors including flavor, nicotine content, vaping regime, and the region of respiratory tree (bronchial or alveolar). Toxic chemicals and flavoring agents detected in high concentrations in the E-smoke of each flavor warrant independent evaluation for their specific role in imparting toxicity. Therefore, multi-disciplinary approaches are warranted for comprehensive safety profiling of ECIG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76863732020-11-27 Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models Ganguly, Koustav Nordström, Axel Thimraj, Tania A. Rahman, Mizanur Ramström, Malin Sompa, Shanzina I. Lin, Elizabeth Z. O’Brien, Fiona Koelmel, Jeremy Ernstgård, Lena Johanson, Gunnar Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri Palmberg, Lena Upadhyay, Swapna Sci Rep Article Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on physiologically relevant human bronchial and alveolar lung mucosa models cultured at air–liquid interface. E-smoke was characterized by significantly increased particle number concentrations with increased wattage (25, 40, and 55 W) and nicotine presence. The chemical composition of E-smoke differed across the two tested flavors in terms of cytotoxic compounds including p-benzoquinone, nicotyrine, and flavoring agents (for example vanillin, ethyl vanillin). Significant differences in the expression of markers for pro-inflammation, oxidative stress, tissue injury/repair, alarm anti-protease, anti-microbial defense, epithelial barrier function, and epigenetic modification were observed between the flavors, nicotine content, and/ or lung models (bronchial or alveolar). Our findings indicate that ECIG toxicity is influenced by combination of multiple factors including flavor, nicotine content, vaping regime, and the region of respiratory tree (bronchial or alveolar). Toxic chemicals and flavoring agents detected in high concentrations in the E-smoke of each flavor warrant independent evaluation for their specific role in imparting toxicity. Therefore, multi-disciplinary approaches are warranted for comprehensive safety profiling of ECIG. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7686373/ /pubmed/33235237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ganguly, Koustav
Nordström, Axel
Thimraj, Tania A.
Rahman, Mizanur
Ramström, Malin
Sompa, Shanzina I.
Lin, Elizabeth Z.
O’Brien, Fiona
Koelmel, Jeremy
Ernstgård, Lena
Johanson, Gunnar
Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri
Palmberg, Lena
Upadhyay, Swapna
Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title_full Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title_fullStr Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title_short Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
title_sort addressing the challenges of e-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gangulykoustav addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT nordstromaxel addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT thimrajtaniaa addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT rahmanmizanur addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT ramstrommalin addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT sompashanzinai addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT linelizabethz addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT obrienfiona addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT koelmeljeremy addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT ernstgardlena addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT johansongunnar addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT pollittkrystaljgodri addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT palmberglena addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels
AT upadhyayswapna addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels