Cargando…
Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models
Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w |
_version_ | 1783613321168027648 |
---|---|
author | Ganguly, Koustav Nordström, Axel Thimraj, Tania A. Rahman, Mizanur Ramström, Malin Sompa, Shanzina I. Lin, Elizabeth Z. O’Brien, Fiona Koelmel, Jeremy Ernstgård, Lena Johanson, Gunnar Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri Palmberg, Lena Upadhyay, Swapna |
author_facet | Ganguly, Koustav Nordström, Axel Thimraj, Tania A. Rahman, Mizanur Ramström, Malin Sompa, Shanzina I. Lin, Elizabeth Z. O’Brien, Fiona Koelmel, Jeremy Ernstgård, Lena Johanson, Gunnar Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri Palmberg, Lena Upadhyay, Swapna |
author_sort | Ganguly, Koustav |
collection | PubMed |
description | Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on physiologically relevant human bronchial and alveolar lung mucosa models cultured at air–liquid interface. E-smoke was characterized by significantly increased particle number concentrations with increased wattage (25, 40, and 55 W) and nicotine presence. The chemical composition of E-smoke differed across the two tested flavors in terms of cytotoxic compounds including p-benzoquinone, nicotyrine, and flavoring agents (for example vanillin, ethyl vanillin). Significant differences in the expression of markers for pro-inflammation, oxidative stress, tissue injury/repair, alarm anti-protease, anti-microbial defense, epithelial barrier function, and epigenetic modification were observed between the flavors, nicotine content, and/ or lung models (bronchial or alveolar). Our findings indicate that ECIG toxicity is influenced by combination of multiple factors including flavor, nicotine content, vaping regime, and the region of respiratory tree (bronchial or alveolar). Toxic chemicals and flavoring agents detected in high concentrations in the E-smoke of each flavor warrant independent evaluation for their specific role in imparting toxicity. Therefore, multi-disciplinary approaches are warranted for comprehensive safety profiling of ECIG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7686373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76863732020-11-27 Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models Ganguly, Koustav Nordström, Axel Thimraj, Tania A. Rahman, Mizanur Ramström, Malin Sompa, Shanzina I. Lin, Elizabeth Z. O’Brien, Fiona Koelmel, Jeremy Ernstgård, Lena Johanson, Gunnar Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri Palmberg, Lena Upadhyay, Swapna Sci Rep Article Limited toxicity data on electronic cigarette (ECIG) impede evidence-based policy recommendations. We compared two popular mixed fruit flavored ECIG-liquids with and without nicotine aerosolized at 40 W (E-smoke) with respect to particle number concentrations, chemical composition, and response on physiologically relevant human bronchial and alveolar lung mucosa models cultured at air–liquid interface. E-smoke was characterized by significantly increased particle number concentrations with increased wattage (25, 40, and 55 W) and nicotine presence. The chemical composition of E-smoke differed across the two tested flavors in terms of cytotoxic compounds including p-benzoquinone, nicotyrine, and flavoring agents (for example vanillin, ethyl vanillin). Significant differences in the expression of markers for pro-inflammation, oxidative stress, tissue injury/repair, alarm anti-protease, anti-microbial defense, epithelial barrier function, and epigenetic modification were observed between the flavors, nicotine content, and/ or lung models (bronchial or alveolar). Our findings indicate that ECIG toxicity is influenced by combination of multiple factors including flavor, nicotine content, vaping regime, and the region of respiratory tree (bronchial or alveolar). Toxic chemicals and flavoring agents detected in high concentrations in the E-smoke of each flavor warrant independent evaluation for their specific role in imparting toxicity. Therefore, multi-disciplinary approaches are warranted for comprehensive safety profiling of ECIG. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7686373/ /pubmed/33235237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ganguly, Koustav Nordström, Axel Thimraj, Tania A. Rahman, Mizanur Ramström, Malin Sompa, Shanzina I. Lin, Elizabeth Z. O’Brien, Fiona Koelmel, Jeremy Ernstgård, Lena Johanson, Gunnar Pollitt, Krystal J. Godri Palmberg, Lena Upadhyay, Swapna Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title | Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title_full | Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title_fullStr | Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title_full_unstemmed | Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title_short | Addressing the challenges of E-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
title_sort | addressing the challenges of e-cigarette safety profiling by assessment of pulmonary toxicological response in bronchial and alveolar mucosa models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77452-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gangulykoustav addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT nordstromaxel addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT thimrajtaniaa addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT rahmanmizanur addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT ramstrommalin addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT sompashanzinai addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT linelizabethz addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT obrienfiona addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT koelmeljeremy addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT ernstgardlena addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT johansongunnar addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT pollittkrystaljgodri addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT palmberglena addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels AT upadhyayswapna addressingthechallengesofecigarettesafetyprofilingbyassessmentofpulmonarytoxicologicalresponseinbronchialandalveolarmucosamodels |