Cargando…
Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors
Detecting changes in the environment is fundamental for our survival. According to predictive coding theory, detecting these irregularities relies both on incoming sensory information and our top–down prior expectations (or internal generative models) about the world. Prediction errors (PEs), detect...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.541670 |
_version_ | 1783613349028691968 |
---|---|
author | Rowe, Elise G. Tsuchiya, Naotsugu Garrido, Marta I. |
author_facet | Rowe, Elise G. Tsuchiya, Naotsugu Garrido, Marta I. |
author_sort | Rowe, Elise G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Detecting changes in the environment is fundamental for our survival. According to predictive coding theory, detecting these irregularities relies both on incoming sensory information and our top–down prior expectations (or internal generative models) about the world. Prediction errors (PEs), detectable in event-related potentials (ERPs), occur when there is a mismatch between the sensory input and our internal model (i.e., a surprise event). Many changes occurring in our environment are irrelevant for survival and may remain unseen. Such changes, even if subtle, can nevertheless be detected by the brain without emerging into consciousness. What remains unclear is how these changes are processed in the brain at the network level. Here, we used a visual oddball paradigm in which participants engaged in a central letter task during electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings while presented with task-irrelevant high- or low-coherence background, random-dot motion. Critically, once in a while, the direction of the dots changed. After the EEG session, we confirmed that changes in motion direction at high- and low-coherence were visible and invisible, respectively, using psychophysical measurements. ERP analyses revealed that changes in motion direction elicited PE regardless of the visibility, but with distinct spatiotemporal patterns. To understand these responses, we applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to the EEG data. Bayesian Model Averaging showed visible PE relied on a release from adaptation (repetition suppression) within bilateral MT+, whereas invisible PE relied on adaptation at bilateral V1 (and left MT+). Furthermore, while feedforward upregulation was present for invisible PE, the visible change PE also included downregulation of feedback between right MT+ to V1. Our findings reveal a complex interplay of modulation in the generative network models underlying visible and invisible motion changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7686547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76865472020-11-30 Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors Rowe, Elise G. Tsuchiya, Naotsugu Garrido, Marta I. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Detecting changes in the environment is fundamental for our survival. According to predictive coding theory, detecting these irregularities relies both on incoming sensory information and our top–down prior expectations (or internal generative models) about the world. Prediction errors (PEs), detectable in event-related potentials (ERPs), occur when there is a mismatch between the sensory input and our internal model (i.e., a surprise event). Many changes occurring in our environment are irrelevant for survival and may remain unseen. Such changes, even if subtle, can nevertheless be detected by the brain without emerging into consciousness. What remains unclear is how these changes are processed in the brain at the network level. Here, we used a visual oddball paradigm in which participants engaged in a central letter task during electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings while presented with task-irrelevant high- or low-coherence background, random-dot motion. Critically, once in a while, the direction of the dots changed. After the EEG session, we confirmed that changes in motion direction at high- and low-coherence were visible and invisible, respectively, using psychophysical measurements. ERP analyses revealed that changes in motion direction elicited PE regardless of the visibility, but with distinct spatiotemporal patterns. To understand these responses, we applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to the EEG data. Bayesian Model Averaging showed visible PE relied on a release from adaptation (repetition suppression) within bilateral MT+, whereas invisible PE relied on adaptation at bilateral V1 (and left MT+). Furthermore, while feedforward upregulation was present for invisible PE, the visible change PE also included downregulation of feedback between right MT+ to V1. Our findings reveal a complex interplay of modulation in the generative network models underlying visible and invisible motion changes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7686547/ /pubmed/33262694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.541670 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rowe, Tsuchiya and Garrido. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Rowe, Elise G. Tsuchiya, Naotsugu Garrido, Marta I. Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title | Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title_full | Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title_fullStr | Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title_short | Detecting (Un)seen Change: The Neural Underpinnings of (Un)conscious Prediction Errors |
title_sort | detecting (un)seen change: the neural underpinnings of (un)conscious prediction errors |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33262694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.541670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roweeliseg detectingunseenchangetheneuralunderpinningsofunconsciouspredictionerrors AT tsuchiyanaotsugu detectingunseenchangetheneuralunderpinningsofunconsciouspredictionerrors AT garridomartai detectingunseenchangetheneuralunderpinningsofunconsciouspredictionerrors |