Cargando…
Evaluation of negative pressure transfer through tissue in a benchtop cornea and eyelid model
PURPOSE: A new glaucoma treatment device, known as the multi-pressure dial (MPD), has been introduced, which offers a novel approach to IOP reduction by delivering negative pressure to the periocular region. Clinical studies have demonstrated the IOP-lowering effect of the MPD via direct measurement...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33283154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515841420971406 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: A new glaucoma treatment device, known as the multi-pressure dial (MPD), has been introduced, which offers a novel approach to IOP reduction by delivering negative pressure to the periocular region. Clinical studies have demonstrated the IOP-lowering effect of the MPD via direct measurements using pneumatonometry. It remains unclear whether the eyelids, when closed, affect the transmission of negative pressure and subsequently affect IOP reduction. This study aimed to evaluate whether the transfer of negative pressure and subsequent decrease in IOP are altered by the presence of synthetic eyelid tissue. METHODS: A model with 13 different configurations controlling for eyelid material type, presence of slit/opening, and eyelid–cornea contact was employed. The slit modification was employed to mimic the physiologic separation that exists between the eyelids. Baseline IOP within an eye model was set at various levels ranging from 10 to 30 mmHg with applied negative pressure settings of 10, 15, and 20 mmHg utilized at each baseline IOP. The percentage of vacuum transfer was calculated by comparing baseline IOP to resultant IOP measurements following application of vacuum to the system. RESULTS: In the open configuration (without eyelid tissue), the mean % vacuum transfer was 98.7%. The sealed, full-contact configurations exhibited values of 97.4%, 98.8%, and 97.2%. The slit configurations, which closely mimic the physiologic eyelid, demonstrated a mean % vacuum transfer of 98.7% across all settings. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of eyelid tissue on transfer of negative pressure can be isolated and evaluated. The presence of eyelid tissue has an insignificant impact on the transfer of negative pressure, and the IOP reduction achievable with the MPD would not be altered with the eyelids closed. |
---|