Cargando…

Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience

BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft survival continuously improved with introduction of novel immunosuppressants. However, also immunologically challenging transplants (blood group incompatibility and sensitized recipients) increase. Between 2006 and 2008, a new tailored immunosuppression scheme for kidney...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Good-Weber, Miriam, Roos, Malgorzata, Mueller, Thomas F., Rüsi, Barbara, Fehr, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02137-5
_version_ 1783613378158133248
author Good-Weber, Miriam
Roos, Malgorzata
Mueller, Thomas F.
Rüsi, Barbara
Fehr, Thomas
author_facet Good-Weber, Miriam
Roos, Malgorzata
Mueller, Thomas F.
Rüsi, Barbara
Fehr, Thomas
author_sort Good-Weber, Miriam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft survival continuously improved with introduction of novel immunosuppressants. However, also immunologically challenging transplants (blood group incompatibility and sensitized recipients) increase. Between 2006 and 2008, a new tailored immunosuppression scheme for kidney transplantation was implemented at the University Hospital in Zurich, together with an ABO-incompatible transplant program and systematic pre- and posttransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody screening by Luminex technology. This study retrospectively evaluated the results of this tailored immunosuppression approach with a particular focus on immunologically higher risk transplants. METHODS: A total of 204 consecutive kidney transplantations were analyzed, of whom 14 were ABO-incompatible and 35 recipients were donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) positive, but complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) negative. We analyzed patient and graft survival, acute rejection rates and infectious complications in ABO-compatible versus -incompatible and in DSA positive versus negative patients and compared those with a historical control group. RESULTS: Overall patient, death-censored allograft survival and non-death-censored allograft survival at 4 years were 92, 91 and 87%, respectively. We found that (1) there were no differences between ABO-compatible and -incompatible and between DSA positive and DSA negative patients concerning acute rejection rate and graft survival; (2) compared with the historical control group there was a significant decrease of acute rejection rates in sensitized patients who received an induction with thymoglobulin; (3) there was no increased rate of infection among the patients who received induction with thymoglobulin compared to no induction therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We observed excellent overall mid-term patient and graft survival rates with our tailored immunosuppression approach. Induction with thymoglobulin was efficient and safe in keeping rejection rates low in DSA positive patients with a negative CDC-XM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-020-02137-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76866772020-11-25 Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience Good-Weber, Miriam Roos, Malgorzata Mueller, Thomas F. Rüsi, Barbara Fehr, Thomas BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft survival continuously improved with introduction of novel immunosuppressants. However, also immunologically challenging transplants (blood group incompatibility and sensitized recipients) increase. Between 2006 and 2008, a new tailored immunosuppression scheme for kidney transplantation was implemented at the University Hospital in Zurich, together with an ABO-incompatible transplant program and systematic pre- and posttransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody screening by Luminex technology. This study retrospectively evaluated the results of this tailored immunosuppression approach with a particular focus on immunologically higher risk transplants. METHODS: A total of 204 consecutive kidney transplantations were analyzed, of whom 14 were ABO-incompatible and 35 recipients were donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) positive, but complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) negative. We analyzed patient and graft survival, acute rejection rates and infectious complications in ABO-compatible versus -incompatible and in DSA positive versus negative patients and compared those with a historical control group. RESULTS: Overall patient, death-censored allograft survival and non-death-censored allograft survival at 4 years were 92, 91 and 87%, respectively. We found that (1) there were no differences between ABO-compatible and -incompatible and between DSA positive and DSA negative patients concerning acute rejection rate and graft survival; (2) compared with the historical control group there was a significant decrease of acute rejection rates in sensitized patients who received an induction with thymoglobulin; (3) there was no increased rate of infection among the patients who received induction with thymoglobulin compared to no induction therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We observed excellent overall mid-term patient and graft survival rates with our tailored immunosuppression approach. Induction with thymoglobulin was efficient and safe in keeping rejection rates low in DSA positive patients with a negative CDC-XM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-020-02137-5. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7686677/ /pubmed/33228545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02137-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Good-Weber, Miriam
Roos, Malgorzata
Mueller, Thomas F.
Rüsi, Barbara
Fehr, Thomas
Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title_full Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title_fullStr Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title_full_unstemmed Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title_short Tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
title_sort tailored immunosuppression after kidney transplantation - a single center real-life experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-02137-5
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwebermiriam tailoredimmunosuppressionafterkidneytransplantationasinglecenterreallifeexperience
AT roosmalgorzata tailoredimmunosuppressionafterkidneytransplantationasinglecenterreallifeexperience
AT muellerthomasf tailoredimmunosuppressionafterkidneytransplantationasinglecenterreallifeexperience
AT rusibarbara tailoredimmunosuppressionafterkidneytransplantationasinglecenterreallifeexperience
AT fehrthomas tailoredimmunosuppressionafterkidneytransplantationasinglecenterreallifeexperience